Measuring the competition and banking efficiency level: a study at four commercial banks in Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(1).2021.02
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2021 , Issue #1, pp. 17-26
- Cited by
- 1385 Views
-
793 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The banking sector plays a vital role in the economy of each country. Banks are required to operate in a sound, efficient, and reliable manner in order to stimulate economic growth. To achieve that, a basic framework for the Indonesian banking system has been developed, known as the Indonesian Banking Architecture (IBA) aimed at strengthening the structure and enhancing the competitiveness of the banking industry. This study aimed to analyze the level of competition, the ability, and influence of the competition on banks efficiency, so banks can maintain the performance level and provide economic growth. This study used a quantitative approach with a panel regression analysis model. The results have shown that the banking industry in Indonesia tends to be monopolistic. The character of many sellers, differentiated products, sellers freely entering and leaving the market, as well as the presence of advertisement and product quality competitions were examined. Bank competition that leads to a monopolistic market structure stimulated banks to achieve higher profits and put bank projects and financing at high risk. Competition had a negative correlation with bank efficiency because competition encourages banks to focus on profit rather than efficiency, engage in risky financing/projects, and undertake high lending activities. Moreover, four big banks in Indonesia are in the “too big to fail” position. Banking regulators in Indonesia must maintain and produce reliable and stable banks to compete globally.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank all those who have contributed to the completion of this article, especially the leadership of the Department of Economics and the Faculty of Economics and Business, Brawijaya University, who provided facilitation for publication in reputable international journals.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E47, G28, L10
-
References31
-
Tables3
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Lerner index by quarters, 2011–2018
- Figure 2. Efficiency score based on the cost efficiency by quarters, 2011–2018
-
- Table 1. Banks that met the criteria
- Table 2. Individual significance test results
- Table 3. Cross sectional fixed effect test results
-
- Abbasoglu, F. O., Aysan, A. F., & Gunes, A. (2007). Concentration, competition, efficiency and profitability of the Turkish Banking sector in the post crises period (MPRA Paper No. 5494).
- Al-Obaidan, A. M. (2008). Market structure, concentration and performance in the commercial banking industry of emerging market. European Journal of Economics, Finance, and Administrative Science, 1(12), 104-114.
- Andrieş, A. M., & Cǎpraru, B. (2014). The nexus between competition and efficiency: The European banking industries experience. International Business Review, 23(3), 566-579.
- Arrawatia, R., Misra, A. K., & Dawar, V. (2015). Bank competition and efficiency: Empirical evidence from Indian market. International Journal of Law and Management, 57(3), 217-231.
- Atmawardhana. (2006). Analisis efisiensi Bank Umum Syariah dan Bank konvensional yang memiliki unit usaha Syariah di Indonesia, setelah pemberlakuan Undang-Undang No. 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan (Pendekatan Data Envelopment Analysis) [Efficiency Analysis of Sharia Commercial Banks and Conventional Banks which is having Sharia Business Units in Indonesia, after the enactment of Law No. 10 of 1998 concerning Banking (Data Envelopment Analysis Approach)] (Unpublished Thesis). Faculty of Economic, Indonesia Islamic University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
- Bank Indonesia. (2013). Laporan Perekonomian Indonesia [Indonesian Economic Report]. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia, Departemen Kebijakan Ekonomi dan Moneter.
- Bank Indonesia. (2018). Laporan Kebijakan Moneter Triwulan III 2018 [Quarterly Monetary Policy Report of 2018]. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia, Department of Economic and Monetary Policy.
- Berger, A., & Hannan, T. (1998). The efficiency cost of market power in the banking industry: A test of the “quiet life” and related hypotheses. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(3), 454-465.
- Casu, B., & Girardone, C. (2009). Testing the relationship between competition and efficiency in banking: A panel data analysis. Economics Letters, 105(1), 134-137.
- Cetorelli, N. (2001). Competition among banks: Good or bad? Economic Perspective, 25(QII), 38-48.
- Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2004). What drives Bank competition? Some International evidence. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(3), 563-583.
- Duygun, M., Sena, V., & Shaban, M. (2013). Schumpeterian competition and efficiency among commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(12), 5176-5185.
- Financial Services Authority. (2004). Arsitektur Perbankan Indonesia [Indonesian Banking Architecture]. Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
- Financial Services Authority. (2018a). Statistik Perbankan Indonesia tahun 2018 [The Indonesian Banking Statistics]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
- Financial Services Authority. (2018b). Laporan Keuangan Perbankan [Banking Finansial Reports]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
- Fungáčová, Z., Pessarossi, P., & Weill, L. (2013). Is bank competition detrimental to efficiency? Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 27, 121-134.
- Hadad, M. D., Santoso, W., Mardanugraha, E., & Illyas, D. (2003). Pendekatan parametrik untuk efisiensi Perbankan Indonesia [Parametric Approach to Indonesian Banking Efficiency]. Jurnal Penelitian, 1-27.
- Indonesian Constitution. (1999). Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
- Joesron, T. M., & Fathorrozi, M. (2012). Teori ekonomi mikro [Theory of Micro-Economy]. Yogyakarta: Grata Ilmu.
- Khan, H. H., Kutan, A. M., Ahmad, R. B., & Gee, C. S. (2017). Does higher bank concentration reduce the level of competition in the banking industry? Further evidence from South East Asian economies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 52, 91-106.
- Maudos., Pastor., Perez., & Quesada. (2002). Cost and profit efficiency in European banks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 12(1), 33-58.
- Naceur, S. B., Ben-Khedhiri, H., & Casu, B. (2009). What drives efficiency of selected MENA banks? A meta-frontier analysis (IMF Working Paper No. WP/11/34).
- Nguyen, T. P. T., & Nghiem, S. H. (2017). The effects of competition on efficiency: The Vietnamese Banking industry experience. The Singapore Economic Review, 65(06), 1507-1536.
- Schaeck, K., & Čihák, M. (2008). How does competition affect efficiency and soundness in banking? New empirical evidence (Working Paper Series No. 932). European Central Bank.
- Siagian, S. P. (2001). Sistem informasi manajemen [Management of information system]. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
- Smirlock, M. (1985). Evidence of the (Non) relationship between concentration and profitability in Banking. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 17(1), 69-83.
- Suseno., & Abdullah, P. (2003). Seri kebanksentralan: Sistem dan kebijakan perbankan di Indonesia [The central banking series: Indonesian banking system and policy]. Jakarta: Pusat Pendidikan dan Studi Kebanksentralan.
- Utama, C. (2006). Mengukur tingkat kesehatan bank di Indonesia [Measuring the soundness of banks in Indonesia]. Bina Ekonomi, 1(1), 1-120.
- Widarjono, A. (2013). Ekonometrika pengantar dan aplikasinya [Introduction to econometrics and its applications]. Yogyakarta: Ekonisia.
- Williams, J. (2012). Efficiency and market power in Latin American banking. Journal of Financial Stability, 8(4), 263-276.
- Ye, Q., Xu, Z., & Fang, D. (2012). Market structure, performance, and efficiency of the Chinese banking sector. Economic Change and Restructuring, 45, 337-358.