European Deposit Insurance Scheme implementation: pros and cons
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(1).2021.11
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2021 , Issue #1, pp. 116-126
- Cited by
- 1333 Views
-
787 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The creation of deposit insurance systems in world practice has become a tool for solving problems of maintaining the stability of banking systems, increasing customer confidence in banks and other credit institutions, and preventing cases of mass withdrawal of deposits during economic crises. The paper aims to examine why such an important pillar of the banking union as the European Deposit Insurance Scheme (EDIS) has not yet been implemented. The deadlock in the EDIS negotiations is unprecedented, and the likelihood that the agreement towards this pillar will be reached is rather low. The main reason for its blocking is the existing differences of interests between the main actors, and as a consequence, it makes the progress towards the completion of this process impossible. This study attempts to structure these interests, and it seems that the necessary tool to help bring them together is the concept of moral hazard. The results obtained confirmed the hypothesis that the main barrier for EDIS introduction is the severe difference of interest between countries that can be potentially major contributors and those that hope to benefit from that. Moreover, one of the arguments for such a delay is that cross-border subsidization leads to the problem when the country with better economic indicators pays for the debts of weaker economies as the costs should be socialized.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F36, F53, G21, G22
-
References32
-
Tables0
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. NPL ratio in Western Europe (March 2019)
- Figure 2. German evolution of national debt
-
- Abascal, M., Alonso-Gispert, T., Fernández de Lis, S., & Golecki, W. A. (2015). A banking union for Europe: Making a virtue out of necessity. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics, 13(1), 20-39.
- Bohn, G. J., & Hall, J. B. (1997). The Moral Hazard of Insuring the Insurers (NBER Working Paper No. 5911).
- Council of the EU. (2016). Council Conclusions on a roadmap to complete the Banking Union (Press release No. 353/16).
- Demertzis, M., Donnery, S., Haben, P., & Lehman, A. (2017). Banks and borrowers in distress – Europe’s NPL crisis. Bruegel podcast.
- European Commission (EC). (2012). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. A Roadmap towards a Banking Union (No. 52012DC0510).
- European Commission (EC). (2015a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “Towards the completion of the Banking Union”.
- European Commission (EC). (2015b). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 806/2014 in order to establish a European Deposit Insurance Scheme (No. 52015PC0586).
- European Commission (EC). (2017a). Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on completing the Banking Union.
- European Commission (EC). (2017b). Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union.
- European Commission (EC). (2018). Banking Union: Commission welcomes agreement to further reduce risk and strengthen European banks. European Commission Press-release.
- European Union (EU). (2014). Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on deposit guarantee schemes (recast). Text with EEA relevance. Official Journal of the European Union, 173, 149-178.
- Garcia, G., & Prast, H. (2003). Depositor and Investor Protection in the EU and the Netherlands: A Brief History. Journal of European Economic History, 37-48.
- Golab, A., Jie, F., Powell, R., & Zamojska, A. (2018). Cointegration between the European Union and the selected global markets following Sovereign Debt Crisis. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(1), 35-45.
- Heller, G., & Strupczewski, J. (2015). EU, Germany head for clash over deposit insurance plan. Reuters.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2017). Euro Area Policies (IMF Country Report No. 17/235).
- Kuznichenko, Y., Frolov, S., Zhuravka, F., Yefimov, M., & Fedchenko, V. (2018). Regulatory assessment of the bank market risk: international approaches and Ukrainian practice. Banks and Bank Systems, 13(4), 73-84.
- Lee, P. (2019). Look behind Germany’s surprise call for deposit insurance. Euromoney.
- Menrad, M. (2020). Systematic review of omni-channel banking and preview of upcoming developments in Germany. Innovative Marketing, 16(2), 104-.125.
- Mersch, Y. (2013). The Banking Union – a European perspective: reasons, benefits and challenges of the Banking Union (Speech). European Central Bank.
- Merton, R. C., (1997). An Analytic Derivation of the Cost of Deposit Insurance and Loan Guarantees: An Application of Modern Option Pricing Theory. Journal of Banking and Finance, 1(1), 3-60.
- Odintsova, M. (2009). Institutsianalnaya Ekonomika – Institutional Economics (pp. 158-171). Moscow. (In Russian).
- Oliynyk, V., Zhuravka, F., Bolgar, T., & Yevtushenko, O. (2017). Optimal control of continuous life insurance model. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(4), 21-29.
- Samitas, A., Kampouris, E., Polyzos, S., & Spyridou, A. E. (2020). Spillover effects between Greece and Cyprus: a DCC model on the interdependence of small economies. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(4), 121-135.
- Schäuble, W. (2015). Statement by Minister of Finance of the Federal Republic of Germany to the International Monetary and Financial Committee. Thirty-Second Meeting October 9, 2015, Lima: International Monetary and Financial Committee.
- Statista. (2019). Ratio of non-performing loans ratio in Western Europe Q1 2019, by country.
- Statista. (2020). Germany: national debt from 2010 to 2022 in relation to gross domestic product.
- Storm, S. (2017). How a Flawed Structure is Hurting the Eurozone – Economically and Politically. INET Conference “Reawakening” Edinburgh, 21-23 October 2017.
- Strupczewski, J. (2019a). Euro zone vows to be responsible in regulating banks’ sovereign holdings. Thomson Reuters, Brussels, November.
- Strupczewski, J. (2019b). Euro zone ministers seek bank deal amid Italy, Germany obstacles. Thomson Reuters, Brussels, December.
- The Economist. (21.11.2019). What next for Europe’s banking union?
- Van Rompuy, H. (2012). Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union (Report).
- Van Wolferen, J., Inbar, Y., & Zeelenberg, M. (2013). Moral hazard in the insurance industry (Panel Paper No. 33). Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement.