United States banking stability: An explanation through machine learning
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(4).2020.12
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2020, Issue #4, pp. 137-149
- Cited by
- 618 Views
-
168 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In this paper, an analysis of the prediction of bank stability in the United States from 1990 to 2017 is carried out, using bank solvency, delinquency and an ad hoc bank stability indicator as variables to measure said stability. Different machine learning assembly models have been used in the study, a random forest is developed because it is the most accurate of all those tested. Another novel element of the work is the use of partial dependency graphs (PDP) and individual conditional expectation curves (ICES) to interpret the results that allow observing for specific values how the banking variables vary, when the macro-financial variables vary.
It is concluded that the most determining variables to predict bank solvency in the United States are interest rates, specifically the mortgage rate and the 5 and 10-year interest rates of treasury bonds, reducing solvency as these rates increase. For delinquency, the most important variable is the unemployment rate in the forecast. The financial stability index is made up of the normalized difference between the two factors obtained, one for solvency and the other for delinquency. The index prediction concludes that stability worsens as BBB corporate yield increases.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C40, E47, G21
-
References23
-
Tables2
-
Figures18
-
- Figure 1. MSE models
- Figure 2a. Node purity increase vs. mse increase
- Figure 2b. Times a root vs mean min. depth
- Figure 3a. Times a root vs mean min. depth
- Figure 3b. Node purity increase vs. mse increase
- Figure 4a. Factors and differential
- Figure 4b. Bank stability index
- Figure 5. MSE (Bank stability Index)
- Figure 6. Muti-way importance plot
- Figure 7. ICEX curves e11
- Figure 8. ICEX curves e9
- Figure 9. ICEX curves e8
- Figure 10a. Prediction of the forest (e8, e11)
- Figure 10b. Prediction of the forest (e9, e11)
- Figure 11a. ICE plot
- Figure 11b. c-ICE plot
- Figure 11c. d-ICE plot
- Figure 12. e9, e10 and e11 predictions
-
- Table 1. Variables
- Table A1. Variables and factor structure
-
- Alessi, L., & Detken, C. (2014). Identifying excessive credit growth and leverage (Working Paper Series No. 1723). European Central Bank.
- Apley, D., & Zhu, J. (2019). Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 82(4), 1059-1086.
- Beutel, J., List, S., & von Schweinitz, G. (2018). An evaluation of early warning models for systemic banking crises: Does machine learning improve predictions? (Discussion Paper Deutsche Bundesbank No. 48).
- Bookstaber, R., Cetina, J., Feldberg, G., Flood, M., & Glasserman, P. (2013). Stress Tests to Promote Financial Stability: Assessing Progress and Looking to the Future. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 7(1), 16-25.
- Borio, C., & Lowe, P. (2002). Asset prices, financial and monetary stability: exploring the nexus (BIS Working Papers, No. 114). Basel.
- Borio, C., Drehmann, M., & Tsatsaron, K. (2012). Stress-testing macro stress testing: Does it live up to expectations? (BIS Working Papers No 369).
- Boyd, J., Levine, R., & Smith, B. (2001). The Impact of Inflation on Financial Sector Performance. Journal of Monetary Economics, 47(2), 221-248.
- Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32.
- Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. New York: Routledge.
- Budnik, K., Mozzanica, M. B., Dimitrov, I., Groß, J., Hansen, I., di Iasio, G., Kleemann, M., Sanna, F., Sarychev, A., Siņenko, N., & Volk, M. (2019). Macroprudential stress test of the euro area banking system (Occasional Paper Series No. 226). European Central Bank.
- Bussière, M., & Fratzscher, M. (2006). Towards a new early warning system of financial crises. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(6), 953-973.
- Creel, J., Hubert, P., & Labondance, F. (2015). Financial Stability and Economic Performance. Economic Modelling, 48, 25-40.
- Criste, A., & Lupu, I. (2014). The central bank policy between the price stability objective and promoting financial stability. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 219-225.
- Demirgüc-Kunt, A., & Detragiache, E. (1998). The Determinants of Banking Crises in Developing and Developed Countries. IMF Staff Papers, 45(1), 81-109.
- Diaconu, R.-I., & Oanea, D.-C. (2014). The Main Determinants of Bank’s Stability. Evidence from Romanian Banking Sector. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16, 329-335.
- Drehmann, M., & Juselius, M. (2013). Evaluating early warning indicators of banking crises: satisfying policy requirements (BIS Working Papers No. 421).
- Dua, P., & Hema, K. (2018). Macro stress testing and resilience assessment of Indian banking. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(2), 452-475.
- Goldstein, A., Kapelner, A., Bleich, J., & Pitkin, E. (2015). Peeking Inside the Black Box: Visualizing Statistical Learning with Plots of Individual Conditional Expectation. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 24(1), 44-65.
- Jahn, N., & Kick, T. (2012). Determinants of Banking System Stability: A Macro-Prudential Analysis.
- Loh, W.-Y. (2011). Classification and regression trees. WIREs. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(1), 14-23.
- Onder, S., Damar, B., & Ali Hekimoglu, A. (2016). Macro Stress Testing and an Application on Turkish Banking Sector. Procedia Economics and Finance, 38, 17-37.
- Pan, H., & Wang, C. (2013). House prices, bank instability, and economic growth: Evidence from the threshold model. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(5), 1720-1732.
- Zhao, Q., & Hastie, T. (2019). Causal Interpretations of Black-Box Models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1-19.