Assessment of government debt security of emerging markets: theory and practice
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(1).2020.04
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #1, pp. 35-48
- Cited by
- 840 Views
-
117 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study came to inspect a new approach to the government debt security assessment based on the systematization of indicators in terms of four directions: solvency, liquidity, domestic indebtedness, and external indebtedness. The proposed methodology considers the weaknesses, which negatively affect the level of government debt security.
It was established that in 2014−2016 the level of security at emerging markets was the worst. The main reason was insufficient solvency. Also, the obtained results showed that the general assessment of domestic indebtedness in recent years had a more dangerous level than the external one. In addition, it was revealed that similar problems with the level of debt burden are also presented in the EU countries since the value of the analyzed indicator – general government debt to GDP – exceeds 60%.
It is recommended to consider the experience of debt management reform of new members of the EU and, at the same time, post-socialist countries by other emerging economies.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F15, F34, F52
-
References23
-
Tables6
-
Figures6
-
- Figure 1. Establishing the government debt security place in the overall structure
- Figure 2. Conceptual framework for the assessment of the government debt security index
- Figure 3. Integral index of Ukraine’s debt security
- Figure 4. Dynamics of the general assessments and the integral index of the government debt security during 2006−2016
- Figure 5. The ratio of government debt in Ukraine and the Czech Republic, % of GDP, 2006–2016
- Figure 6. The ratio of external debt in Ukraine and the Czech Republic, % of GDP, 2006–2016
-
- Table 1. Comparison of the approaches to the government debt security indicators’ assessment
- Table 2. General government gross debt in emerging economies, % of GDP, 2006–2016
- Table 3. General government gross debt to GDP ratio in European countries in 2016
- Table A1. Results of calculation of the debt security indicators (methodology from 2007)
- Table A2. Results of calculation of the debt security indicators (methodology from 2013)
- Table B1. Results of calculation of the debt security indicators (authors’ approach)
-
- CEIC. (2018). Czech Republic External Debt: % of GDP.
- CEIC. (2018). Ukraine External Debt: % of GDP.
- Collins Dictionary. (n.d.). Definition of “security”.
- Council of the European Communities. (1992). Maastricht Treaty.
- Eurostat. (2018). General government gross debt.
- Fedorovych, I. M. (2014). Ekonomichna otsinka borhovoi stiikosti Ukrainy [Economic evaluation of debt stability of Ukraine]. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia” – Scientific notes of Ostroh Academy National University, 25, 146-151. (In Ukrainian).
- Haber, J. A., Bukhtiarova, A., Chorna, S., Iastremska, O., & Bolgar, T. (2018). Forecasting the level of financial security of the country (on the example of Ukraine). Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 3(15), 304-317.
- Hobbes, T. (1909 ed.) [1651]. Hobbes’s Leviathan. Reprinted from the Edition of 1651 with an Essay by the Late W.G. Pogson Smith, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- International Monetary Fund. (2006). Financial Soundness Indicators: Compilation Guide.
- Jilenga, M. T., Xu, H., & Gondje-Dacka, I. M. (2016). The Impact of External Debt and Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Tanzania. International Journal of Financial Research, 2(7), 154-162.
- Kozmenko, O., & Kuzmenko, O. (2013). Methods for prediction of economic crises in the global economy and financial centers. Public and Municipal Finance, 2(2), 47-55.
- Kunev, Yu. (2007). Bezpeka mytnoi spravy yak skladova bezpeky derzhavy [Customs security as a component of state security]. Mitna sprava – Customs affairs, 2(50), 3-8. (In Ukrainian).
- Londar, L. P. (n.d.). Mozhlyvosti adaptatsii mizhnarodnoho dosvidu upravlinnia derzhavnym borhom v Ukraini [Possibilities of adaptation of the international experience of public debt management in Ukraine]. National Institute for Strategic Studies. (In Ukrainian).
- Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.
- National Security of the USA. (1994). SSHA: ekonomika, politika, ideologiya [USA: economics, politics, ideology] (No. 11-12). (In Russian).
- Ryabushka, L., & Pavelka, F. (2015). Modern view on the fiscal security assessment levels of the European Union country: lessons for Ukraine. Socio-Economic and Humanities Studies, 1(5), 11-30.
- The Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine. (2013). Methodological recommendations for calculating the level of economic security of Ukraine, order from 29.10.2013 No. 1277.
- The Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. (2007). Methodology for Calculating the Level of Economic Security of Ukraine, order from 02.03.2007 No 60.
- The World Bank. (2017). World Development Indicators.
- The World Bank. (2018). International Debt Statistics.
- Ülgentürk, L. (2017). The role of public debt managers in contingent liability management (OECD Working Papers on Sovereign Borrowing and Public Debt Management, No. 8). OECD Publishing, Paris.
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1996). Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine]. (In Ukrainian).
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2010). Biudzhetnyi Kodeks Ukrainy [Budget Code of Ukraine]. (In Ukrainian).