CEO power and bank risk in the UAE
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.11
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2020, Issue #3, pp. 117-128
- Cited by
- 651 Views
-
145 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The lessons from the 2008 global financial crisis show that excessive risk taking and governance failures contribute to the failure of several banks. As a result, the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and risk taking has been the subject of many studies. However, extant studies report inconclusive results. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationship between CEO power and bank risk in the UAE using data over the period of 2015–2018 and a sample of 19 UAE banks. The study uses a Pearson pairwise correlation to analyze the relationship between CEO power and bank risk. In addition, a two-tailed t-test is used to examine the differences between conventional and Islamic banks in terms of CEO power and risk-taking. The results of the study show that CEO power measured using CEO duality and CEO tenure reduces risk. Furthermore, the paper indicates that larger boards and higher CEO ownership tend to increase risk. The study also reports that conventional banks have higher return variability, larger boards and powerful CEOs than Islamic banks. However, Islamic banks tend to have higher non-performing finances than conventional banks. The study provides important insights on the relationship between CEO power and bank risk and concurs with earlier studies. The findings can be of interest to policy makers and can be used as input data for the development of corporate governance mechanisms. Shareholders can also use the survey results as input when appointing a CEO for their banks.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, G32, G34
-
References33
-
Tables6
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework of variables
-
- Table 1. Variable description
- Table 2. Summary statistics
- Table 3. Pearson correlation analysis of the relationship between dependent and independent variables
- Table 4. Pearson correlation analysis of the interaction between dependent and independent variables
- Table 5. Test of the significance difference between conventional and Islamic banks
- Table A1. List of banks included in this study as of July 31, 2019
-
- Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
- Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2005). Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), 1403-1432.
- Allen, M. P. (1981). Managerial power and tenure in the large corporation. Social Forces, 60(2), 484-494.
- Altunbaş, Y., Thornton, J., & Uymaz, Y. (2019). The effect of CEO power on bank risk: Do boards and institutional investors matter? Finance Research Letters, 33.
- Bebchuk, L., Cremers, M., & Peyer, U. (2011). The CEO pay slice. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(1), 199-221.
- Boyd, B., Haynes, K., & Zona, F. (2010). Dimensions of CEO-board relations. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1892-1923.
- Boyd, J. H., & Graham, S. L. (1986). Risk, regulation and bank holding company expansion into nonbanking. Quarterly Review, 10(2), 2-17.
- Chen, D., & Zheng, Y. (2014). CEO Tenure and risk-taking. Global Business Finance Review, 19(1), pp. 1-27.
- Chen, Z., Huang, Y., & Wei, K. C. J. (2013). Executive pay disparity and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(3), 849-885.
- Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157-176.
- Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329-356.
- Daily, C. M., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). Sources of CEO Power and Firm Financial Performance: A Longitudinal Assessment. Journal of Management, 23(2), 97-118.
- Delis, M. D., Tran, K. C., & Tsionas, E. G. (2012). Quantifying and explaining parameter heterogeneity in the capital regulation-bank risk nexus. Journal of Financial Stability, 8(2), 57-68.
- Diga, M., & Kelleher, T. (2009). Social media use, perceptions of decisions-making power and public relations roles. Public Relations Review, 35(4), 440-442.
- Dong, Y., Girardone, C., & Kuo, J-M. (2017). Governance, efficiency and risk taking in Chinese banking. The British Accounting Review, 49(2), 211-229.
- Fahlenbrach, R. (2009). Founder-CEOs, investment decisions, and stock market performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(2), 439-466.
- Fama, E., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
- Gebba, T. R., & Aboelmaged, M. G. (2016). Corporate Governance of UAE Financial Institutions: A Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Banks. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 6(5), 119-160.
- Haider, J., & Fang, H. (2016). Board size and corporate risk: evidence from China. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 17(3), 229-248.
- Haider, J., & Fang, H. (2018). CEO power, corporate risk taking and role of large shareholders. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 10(1), 56-72.
- Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 96-118.
- Houston, J. F., Lin, C., Lin, P., & Ma, Y. (2010). Creditor rights, information sharing, and bank risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 96(3), 485-512.
- Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- KPMG. (2018). GCC listed banks results (Year-ended 31 December 2017).
- Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259-275.
- Pathan, S. (2009). Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(7), 1340-1350.
- Peng, M. W., Zhang, S., & Li, X. (2007). CEO Duality and firm performance during China’s institutional transitions. Managerial and Organization Review, 3(2), 205-225.
- Peni, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2012). Did good corporate governance improve bank performance during the financial crisis? Journal of Financial Services Research, 41(2), 19-35.
- Sheikh, S. (2019). CEO power and corporate risk: The impact of market competition and corporate governance. Corporate Governance International Review, 27(5), 358-377.
- UAE Central Bank. (2016). Financial Stability Report 2016.
- UAE Central Bank. (2017). Financial Stability Report 2017.
- UAE Central Bank. (2018). Financial sustainability report 2018.