Special aspects of the banking institutions rating: a case for Ukraine
-
Received July 18, 2018;Accepted July 16, 2019;Published August 28, 2019
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9655-4467Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4650-7371Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-6968Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0262-1890Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0707-4996Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-1306
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(3).2019.05
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2019, Issue #3, pp. 48-63
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by7 articlesJournal title: The economic discourseArticle title: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF FUNCTIONING OF THE CREDIT SERVICES MARKETDOI: 10.36742/2410-0919-2020-1-8Volume: / Issue: 1 / First page: 68 / Year: 2020Contributors: Artur ZhavoronokJournal title: Market InfrastructureArticle title: FEATURES OF FORMATION OF CREDIT POLICY AND CREDIT PORTFOLIO OF COMMERCIAL BANK IN MODERN CONDITIONSDOI: 10.32843/infrastruct54-34Volume: / Issue: 54 / First page: / Year: 2021Contributors: Natalia OstrovskaJournal title: Black Sea Economic StudiesArticle title: CREDIT: ESSENCE, PRINCIPLES AND FUNCTIONSDOI: 10.32843/bses.64-21Volume: / Issue: 64 / First page: / Year: 2021Contributors: Natalia OstrovskaJournal title: WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICSArticle title: Customer Classification and Decision Making in the Digital Economy based on Scoring ModelsDOI: 10.37394/23207.2023.20.74Volume: 20 / Issue: / First page: 800 / Year: 2023Contributors: Hennadii Mazur, Natalia Burkina, Yurii Popovskyi, Nadiia Vasylenko, Volodymyr Zaiachkovskyi, Ruslan Lavrov, Serhii KozlovskyiJournal title: Pryazovskyi Economic HeraldArticle title: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF ASSESSMENT OF CREDIT CAPACITY OF BORROWERS BY COMMERCIAL BANKSDOI: 10.32840/2522-4263/2021-2-30Volume: / Issue: 2(25) / First page: / Year: 2021Contributors: Natalia OstrovskaJournal title: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENTArticle title: РЕЙТИНГУВАННЯ БАНКІВ ЯК ІНДИКАТОР ЇХНЬОЇ УСПІШНОСТІ НА ФІНАНСОВОМУ РИНКУDOI: 10.25140/2411-5215-2019-3(19)-294-304Volume: / Issue: 3 (19) / First page: 294 / Year: 2019Contributors: Ruslan Lavrov, Andrii KravchenkoJournal title: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENTArticle title: ОСНОВНІ ТЕНДЕНЦІЇ РИНКУ БАНКІВСЬКИХ ПОСЛУГ: КРЕДИТНИЙ ТА ДЕПОЗИТНИЙ АКЦЕНТDOI: 10.25140/2411-5215-2019-4(20)-412-425Volume: / Issue: 4(20) / First page: 412 / Year: 2019Contributors: Maiia Fedyshyn, Artur Zhavoronok, Alla Abramova
- 1157 Views
-
156 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In today’s rapidly changing global financial market, potential counterparties are in dire need of reliable and timely information on the partner bank performance in order to find the most successful one in terms of conducting credit and deposit transactions. Public ratings of banks serve to solve this problem and are considered as one of the effective tools for choosing such a bank. In Ukraine, the rating of banking institutions is not widely used by business entities because of the imperfect methodology of analysis of banks, a rating process that is closed to the public, the assignment of an unreliable rating to selected banks, the use of obtained ratings by banks for marketing purposes, etc. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to improve the existing rating systems for Ukrainian environment. International and domestic regulatory documents on rating, data of the National Bank of Ukraine and commercial banks, materials of rating agencies, as well as scientific publications of well-known Ukrainian and foreign scientists made the theoretical basis of the study. It is proposed to take a number of priority measures to legislatively regulate the activities of bodies for rating scores of banking institutions, to create a branched infrastructure of the rating market and to establish effective interaction of its participants, to end demonopolization and weaken entry barriers and to introduce new agencies in the rating market, to identify new rating methodologies. The conclusions are aimed at the development of a civilized and transparent rating business in Ukraine, which will ultimately contribute to the timely detection and neutralization of crisis phenomena in the banking sector, restoring confidence between banks and their clients, creating the preconditions for making sound business decisions.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, G24
-
References32
-
Tables3
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. General rating scheme of commercial banks
-
- Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of rating systems for evaluating the performance of commercial banks in Ukraine
- Table 2. Peculiarities, rating scale, advantages and disadvantages of international rating agencies’ rating systems
- Table 3. Specific features of rating systems for evaluating banking institutions’ performance in the world’s leading countries
-
- Afanasenko, M. V. (2011). Сутність та значення рейтингових оцінок у процесі управління банком [Sutnist ta znachennia reitynhovykh otsinok u protsesi upravlinnia bankom]. Visnyk Ukrainskoi akademii bankivskoi spravy, 1(30), 72-77.
- Bekh, M. S. (2012). Особливості рейтингової оцінки банків [Osoblyvosti reitynhovoi otsinky bankiv]. Visnyk Chernivetskoho torhovelno-ekonomichnoho instytutu. Ekonomichni nauky, 2, 263-269.
- Credit-Rating. (2018). The official webpage of the Credit-Rating.
- Expert-Rating. (2018). The official webpage of the Expert-Rating.
- Ferri, G., Liu, L.-G., & Majnoni, G. (2001). The role of rating agency assessments in less developed countries: Impact of the proposed Basel guidelines. Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(1), 115-148.
- Fitch Ratings. (2018). The official webpage of the Fitch Ratings.
- Fursova, V. A., & Pivnenko, T. Yu. (2015). Дослідження зарубіжного та вітчизняного досвіду рейтингового оцінювання надійності комерційного банку [Doslidzhennia zarubizhnoho ta vitchyznianoho dosvidu reitynhovoho otsiniuvannia nadiinosti komertsiinoho banku]. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti, 49, 231-234.
- IBI-Rating Agency. (2018). The official webpage of the IBI-Rating Agency.
- Karminskiy, A. M., Peresetskiy, A. A., & Petrov, A. E. (2005). Рейтинги в экономике: методология и практика [Reytingi v ekonomike: metodologiya i praktika]. Moskva: Finansy i statistika.
- Khodorovskiy, M. Ya., & Polushina, O. S. (2010). Рейтинговая оценка финансового состояния банков: проблемы и перспективы [Reytingovaya otsenka finansovogo sostoyaniya bankov: problemy i perspektivy]. Izvestiya Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomika i ekonomicheskiye nauki, 6(32), 65-70.
- Kiff, J., Kisser, M., & Schumacher, L. (2013). Rating through-the-cycle: What does the concept imply for rating stability and accuracy? (IMF WorkingPaper WP/13/64).
- Kozlovsky, S., Fonitska, T. (2013). Modern theoretical and methodological approaches to the budget management system forming. EconomicAnnals-XXI, 3-4, 35-37.
- Kozlovskyi, S., Mazur, H., Vdovenko, N., Shepel, T., & Kozlovskyi, V. (2018). Modeling and forecasting the level of state stimulation of agricultural production in Ukraine based on the theory of fuzzy logic. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(3), 37-53.
- Laere, E., Vantieghem, J., & Baesens, B. (2012). The difference between Moody’s and S&P bank ratings: Is discretion in the rating process causing a split? (RMI Working Paper No. 12/05).
- Lohvynenko, Yu. L. (2009). Сутність та значення рейтингів у підприємницькому середовищі [Sutnist ta znachennia reitynhiv u pidpryiemnytskomu seredovyshchi]. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 19(3), 223-231.
- Moody’s. (2018). The official webpage of the Moody’s.
- Morgan, D. (2002). Rating banks: Risk and uncertainty in an opaque industry. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 874-888.
- Mospanenko, I. V., & Bondarenko, I. I. (2014). Світовий досвід організації системи державного фінансового моніторингу [Svitovyi dosvid orhanizatsii systemy derzhavnoho finansovoho monitorynhu]. Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly. Seriia: Derzhavne upravlinnia, 242(230), 91-94.
- Nabok, R. M., & Nabok, O. M. (2006). Банки та рейтингові агентства. Місце ризиків у схемі рейтингування банків України [Banky ta reitynhovi ahentstva. Mistse ryzykiv u skhemi reitynhuvannia bankiv Ukrainy]. Problemy i perspektyvy rozvytku bankivskoi systemy Ukrainy, 16, 165-173.
- National Bank of Ukraine. (2018). Система CAMELSO [Systema CAMELSO].
- National Rating Agency “Rurik”. (2018). The official webpage of the National Rating Agency “Rurik”.
- Ong, M. (Ed.). (2002). Credit ratings: Methodologies, rationale and default risk. London: Risk Books.
- Packer, F., & Tarashev, N. (2011). Rating methodologies for banks. BIS Quarterly Review, 2, 39-52.
- Pshyk, B. I. (2014). Актуальні проблеми рейтингового оцінювання діяльності банків в Україні [Aktualni problemy reitynhovoho otsiniuvannia diialnosti bankiv v Ukraini]. Visnyk Universytetu bankivskoi spravy Natsionalnoho banku Ukrainy, 2(20), 149-152.
- Resti, A. (2016). Banks’ internal rating models – time for a change? The “system of floors” as proposed by the Basel Committee.
- Rysin, M. V. (2014). Рейтингова оцінка діяльності банків як інструмент аналізу фінансового стану [Reitynhova otsinka diialnosti bankiv yak instrument analizu finansovoho stanu]. Visnyk Universytetu bankivskoi spravy Natsionalnoho banku Ukrainy, 2(20), 159-164.
- Standard & Poor’s. (2018). The official webpage of the Standard & Poor’s.
- Standard-Rating. (2018). The official webpage of the Standard-Rating.
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1996). Про державне регулювання ринку цінних паперів в Україні [Pro derzhavne rehuliuvannia rynku tsinnykh paperiv v Ukraini]. Закон України від 30.10.1996 р. № 448/96-ВР (зі змін. і допов. від 24.11.2018 р. № 2418-VIII) [Zakon Ukrainy vid 30.10.1996 No. 448/96-VR (zizmin. i dopov. vid 24.11.2018 No. 2418-VIII)].
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2018). Про рейтингування [Pro reitynhuvannia]. Проект Закону України від 06.02.2018 р. № 8007 [Proekt Zakonu Ukrainy vid 06.02.2018 No. 8007].
- White, L. (2018). The credit rating agencies and their role in the financial system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Yeletskykh, S. Ya., & Petryshcheva, K. H. (2016). Оцінка стійкості та надійності банків як один із напрямів забезпечення фінансової безпеки підприємства [Otsinka stiikosti ta nadiinosti bankiv yak odyn iz napriamiv zabezpechennia finansovoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva]. Visnyk Donbaskoi derzhavnoi mashynobudivnoi akademii, 3(39), 53-60.
-
Analysis of eSports as a commercial activity
Natalia Lokhman , Oksana Karashchuk , Olena Kornilova doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.20Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 207-213 Views: 4057 Downloads: 1055 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe article deals with eSports as a perspective kind of commercial activity. The research urgency is determined by the fact that, given the active increase of eSports market with growth rates of more than 30% per year, the types of commercial activities in this field and in scientific papers are not studied in an adequate degree.
The purpose of the article is to evaluate the commercial activity development in eSports and to determine the perspectives for its further growth in Ukraine. In order to determine the key types of commercial activity in eSports, the main sources of revenue in this area compared to sports were investigated, which showed a large unrealized potential for increasing revenues from the sale of tickets to competitions, the realization of broadcasting rights and merchandising. The study also showed that the largest number of income sources in eSports is at the stage of cyber-tournaments, which can be explained by a large consumer audience at this stage. However, unlike the esports world practice, computer game producers and well-known manufacturers of consumer goods in Ukraine do not finance domestic competitions, and, therefore, this stage of commercial activity remains at a low level. In modern conditions, among the types of eSports activities in Ukraine, only the computer games production and the cyber-racers game are properly developed.
According to authors, to improve the eSports development in Ukraine, creating the national system of regular eSports competitions is needed, which will form the basis for the development of most types of commercial activities that are part of the cyber-tournaments. To do this, one needs to create appropriate platforms, as well as improve communications with fans in social networks and at amateur competitions. All this will make eSports a highly profitable business in Ukraine.
-
Financial sustainability management of the insurance company: case of Ukraine
Ruslana Pikus , Nataliia Prykaziuk , Mariia Balytska doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.18Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 219-228 Views: 3576 Downloads: 303 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn the current conditions of the Ukrainian economy, which is characterized by crisis phenomena and frequent changes in legislation, the insurance organizations are facing a number of difficulties in maintaining their financial sustainability. Moreover, these processes take place under the increased requirements for solvency of insurers. However, a significant part of domestic insurance companies is financially unstable, which is conditioned not only by the lack of funds, but also by the low level of management. This situation hinders the further development of the insurance market in Ukraine and has a negative impact on all areas of the domestic financial system and prevents it from successful integration into the European financial field. In order to address this problem, it is necessary to distinguish the key groups of risks that affect the financial sustainability of insurance organizations, among which there are the following: insurance, strategic, market risk, risk of inefficient capital structure, risk of limiting the insurance company’s liquidity, tax risk, investment risk, operational risk, the risk of ineffective organizational structure of the enterprise, and information risk. It should be noted that under conditions of changing environment, the impact of these risks only increases, and therefore the task of minimizing the impact of these risks on the activities of insurance companies is highly important. Accordingly, the authors of the article proposed a four-stage strategy to manage the financial sustainability of the insurance company, the purpose of which is to identify the risks of limiting the insurer’s financial sustainability, their qualitative and quantitative assessment, as well as the development and implementation of appropriate measures to minimize and eliminate unacceptable consequences.
-
The peculiarities of economic crisis due to COVID-19 pandemic in a developing country: case of Ukraine
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 13-22 Views: 2400 Downloads: 361 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯAt the beginning of 2020, the world faced the most frightening threat to the population’s health – COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, the international institutions, governments of countries and various organizations are forced to use unprecedented restrictive measures in many spheres of activity. As a result, the economies of the countries all over the world are significantly affected and are on the verge of crisis. This paper presents examples of economic consequences of COVID-19 pandemic for different countries of the world and analyzes still few scientific works, which study the influence of pandemic on their economies. The article generalizes the legislative and anti-crisis measures of the Ukrainian Government, as well as the National Bank of Ukraine and other state authorities. It is evidenced that at the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020, Ukraine witnessed a significant decrease in GDP growth rate, reduction of industrial production and electricity production. The financial indicators also underwent significant losses, particularly the unemployment rate increased as thousands and thousands of labor migrants have returned to Ukraine from European and other countries. The article proves the inconsistency and unprofessionalism of such restrictive and regulatory measures. Finally, the necessity is substantiated to combine the methods of market economy and state regulation. The compulsory steps are offered, which would minimize the losses of the state and its population during this economic crisis.