Strategic group lending for banks
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(1).2018.11
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2018, Issue #1, pp. 115-127
- Cited by
- 1267 Views
-
153 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Credit institutions often refuse to lend money to small firms. Usually, this happens because small firms are not able to provide collateral to lenders. Moreover, given the small amount of required loans, the relative cost of full monitoring is too high for lenders. Group lending contracts have been viewed as an effective solution to credit rationing of small firms in both developing and industrialized countries. The aim of this paper is to highlight the potential of group lending contracts in terms of credit risk management. In particular, this paper provides a theoretical explanation of the potential of group lending programs in screening good borrowers from bad ones to reduce the incidence of non-performing-loans (NPL). This paper shows that the success of firms involved in selected group lending programs is due to the fact that co-signature is an effective screening device: more precisely, if lenders make a proper use of co-signature to screen good firms from bad ones, then only firms that are good ex-ante enter group lending contracts. So, the main argument of this paper is that well designed group lending programs induce good firms to become jointly liable, at least partially, with other good firms and discourage other – bad-firms to do the same. Specifically, co-signature is proven to be a screening device only in the case of a perfectly competitive bank sector.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D82, D84, G21, G23
-
References14
-
Tables0
-
Figures0
-
- Armendariz de Aghion, B., & Gollier, C. (2000). Peer Group Formation in an Adverse Selection Model. The Economic Journal, 110, 632-643.
- Arnott, R., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1991). Moral Hazard and Non-Market Institution: Dysfunctional Crowding Out or Peer Monitoring? American Economic Review, 81, 179-190.
- Attanasio, O., Barr, A., Cardenas, J. C., Genicot, G., & Meghir, C. (2009). Risk Pooling, Risk Preferences, and Social Networks. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(2), 134-167.
- Becker, G. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Besley, T., & Coate, S. (1995). Group Lending, Repayment Incentives, and Social Collateral. Journal of Development Economics, 46(1), 1-18.
- Bloch, B., Genicot, G., & Ray, D. (2008). Informal Insurance in Social Networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 143(1), 36-58.
- Bramoull, Y., & Kranton, R. (2007). Risk Sharing across Communities. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 70-74.
- Bramoull, Y., & Kranton, R. (2007). Risk Sharing Networks. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 64(3-4), 275-294.
- Di Cagno, D., Sciubba, E., & Spallone, M. (2012). Choosing a gambling partner: testing a model of mutual insurance in the lab. Theory and Decision, 72(4), 537-571.
- Fafchamps, M., & Lund, S. (2003). Risk Sharing Networks in Rural Philippines. Journal of Development Economics, 71(2), 261-287.
- Ghatak, M. (1996). Group Lending Contracts and the Peer Selection Effect. The Economic Journal, 110(465), 601-631.
- Stiglitz, J. E. (1990). Peer Monitoring and Credit Markets. The World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), 351-366.
- Van Tassel, E. (1999). Group Lending under Asymmetric Information. Journal of Development Economics, 60(1), 3-25.
- Varian, H. (1990). Monitoring Agents with Other Agents. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 146(1), 153-174.