Implementation of the “bail-in” mechanism in the banking system of Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(3-1).2017.11
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2017, Issue #3, pp. 269-282
- Cited by
- 1033 Views
-
232 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
One of the important tasks of the National Bank of Ukraine is to implement the Directive 2014/59/EU namely to introduce the “bail-in” mechanism, which will enable to resolve insolvency of banks or high probability of its occurrence at the expense of internal sources of banks in order to improve the Ukrainian banking system functioning and adapt it to the requirements and standards of the European Union. The foreign experience of the “bail-in” implementation shows that central banks succeeded in restructuring the balance sheets of banks and significantly reduced the risks of their activities. Thus, the purpose of the study is to substantiate the expediency of the “bail-in” mechanism introduction in banking system of Ukraine. The essence of the “bail-in” mechanism is the involvement of shareholders and lenders of the bank in order to restore its solvency by offsetting shareholders’ equity, subordinated debt, and/or converting/writing off other long-term unsecured and unprovided liabilities in a subordinated debt or shares of the bank. In the process of scientific research, using the comparative method, the method of analogies and methods of logical generalization and scientific abstraction, the structure of the “bail-in” mechanism is determined, which consists of methods (conversion of liabilities into capital, liabilities write-off, capital write-off), provision (normative and legal, financial, organizational and institutional, technical and technological, informational) and levers (incentives, sanctions). Using the expert estimation method, it is proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of the “bail-in” mechanism by comparing the quality of the assets of the bank prior to its implementation and after the completion of the action. The results of the study show that, firstly, the implementation of the “bail-in” mechanism in Ukraine will enable the National Bank of Ukraine to interfere with the activities of banks at an early stage of the problems and to take all necessary measures to restore their solvency. Secondly, the “bail-in” mechanism implementation in Ukraine will increase banks’ resilience to shock, crisis and contribute to long-term financial stability.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, G28, G29
-
References21
-
Tables1
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. The structure of the “bail-in” mechanism
- Figure 2. Algorithm for implementation of the “bail-in” mechanism in Ukraine under the condition of the Banks Financing Fund creation
-
- Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of implementing the “bail-in” mechanism
-
- 45% increase on the rate for the Resolution Fund in 2017. (2017).
- Andersen, Je. (2015). Implementation of BRRD, and use of and experiences with bail-in in Denmark. Oslo, 29 May.
- Bank resolution and “bail-in” in the EU: selected case studies pre and post BRRD. (2016). World Bank Group, 86.
- Boccuzzi, G. (2016). The New European Framework for Banking Crisis Management. Will it be enough? Open Review of Management, Banking and Finance.
- Dewatripont, M. (2014). European Banking: Bail-out, Bail-in and State Aid Control. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 34, 37-43.
- Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and the Council (15.05.2014) establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms.
- EBA FINAL Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on criteria for determining the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities under Directive 2014/59/EU: EBA. (2015).
- Eliasson, E., Jansson, E., Jansson, T. (2014). The Bail-in Tool from a Swedish Perspective. Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review, 2, 23-51.
- Honohan, P. (2017). Management and Resolution of Banking Crises: Lessons from Recent European Experience. Peterson Institute for International Economics, January.
- Imeson M. (2017). New U.K. bail-in rules for banks will protect taxpayers.
- Інструкція про порядок регулювання діяльності банків в Україні № 368 від 28.08.2001 року [Instrukcija pro porjadok reghuljuvannja dijaljnosti bankiv v Ukrajini № 368 vid 28.08.2001 roku].
- Law of 18 December 2015 implementing BRRD and DGSD. (2015).
- Lucchini, S., Moscianese, J., de Angelis, I., Di Benedetto, F. (2017). State Aid and the Banking System in the Financial Crisis: From Bail-out to Bail-in. European Competition Law & Practice, 8(2), 88-98.
- Magnusson, N., Carlstrom, J. (2017). “Big Profits” Justify New Bank Measures, Swedish Government Says.
- Micossi, S., Bruzzone, G., Cassella, M. (2016). Fine-tuning the use of bail-in to promote a stronger EU financial system. CEPS Special report, 136(April), 20.
- Montanaro, E. (2016). The process towards centralisation of the European financial supervisory architecture: the case of the banking union. PSL Quarterly Review, June, 69(277), 135-172.
- Munevar, D., Filoni, Ch. (2016). Italy’s banking problems: a useful guide to the implications of “bail-in”.
- Resolution funds: De Nederlandsche Bank. (2015).
- Schäfer, A., Schnabel, I., Weder, di Mauro, B. (2016). Bail-in expectations for European banks: Actions speak louder than words (Working Paper Series: ESRB, April). 7, 56.
- Your Contribution to the Single Resolution Fund (2015).
- Закон України Про спрощення процедур реорганізації та капіталізації банків № 1985-VIII від 23.03.2017 року [Zakon Ukrajiny “Pro sproshhennja procedur reorghanizaciji ta kapitalizaciji banku” vid 23.03.2017 roku].