Using managerial and market tools to measure the impact of acquisition operations on firm performance

The purpose of the current paper is to elaborate the model for assessing cumulative synergetic effect in M&A (Mergers and Acquisitions) deals on the basis of a real options approach. The majority of papers on the synergetic effects of M&A deals typically focus on a particular type of synergy, while the current paper proposes a model that accounts for the cumulative simultaneous effect of different types of operating and financial synergies. The methodology of our research is loosely based on Datar-Mathews real option valuation model, which is flexible and intuitive for practitioners. Formulae for assessing eight types of synergy typically arising from M&A deals are developed. They are integrated into a single model to assess their cumulative effect on the M&A deal using a simulation modelling approach. The method was used ex post to find synergy values in two recent M&A deals in the pharmaceutical industry, and produced sound results. The proposed approach to value target companies could be used by firms before an M&A deal in the due diligence process. Using this tool a company can build a bidding strategy and define the maximum premium it can pay for the target.

Balanced scorecard model is a method to evaluate and control programs with adequate consistency. According to it, a certain organization is evaluated and controlled in terms of financial aspect, together with growth and learning, internal business processes and customer aspects. This research is practical in purpose and a descriptive inferential method has been used to collect data in addition to utilizing five-scale Likert questionnaire. In order to increase the accuracy of the study, all 320 employees of post company have been under evaluation. A one-sample t-test has been used to analyze the questions of the study. Furthermore, Friedman test has been used to investigate the differences among groups. The results of testing the hypotheses indicate the effect of growth and learning of the employees of post company, as well as internal business processes, customer and financial aspects on the performance of the post company. Moreover, Friedman test probing the differences among groups shows that internal business processes and customer variables have the most significant impact upon the performance of the post company, while growth and learning and financial aspects have the least significant effect on the performance of the post company.

The implementation of the 2004–2005 bank capital reform in Nigeria, introduced to deepen the financial capacity of the banking system, has led to a major restructuring of the banking sector. The reform required banks to increase their equity capital by about 1150 per cent (from two billion to twenty-five billion naira) within 18 months. Due to compliance challenges, the reform formed just twenty-five out of eighty-nine banks that previously existed. More than seventy-five per cent of the banks emerged through mergers and acquisitions. However, despite the massive increase in assets and deposit growth, episodes of bank distress have remained a recurring irritant in the country’s financial system. This study compares bank performance in the pre- and post-reform periods to determine the usefulness or efficacy of the capital reform in boosting bank performance based on panel analysis of data from five banks. The study covered the period 1996–2016. The generalized method of moments was used to evaluate the parameters of the model. The result of the random effects model shows a weak positive effect of total assets and deposit growth on bank performance in the pre-reform period. However, the post-reform assessment reveals that while profitability is significantly low in large-sized banks, it is higher in smaller banks. Given the above evidence, the study asserts that profit performance of banks is substantially linked to restructuring of the sector.