Unobservable characteristics of board directors and the performance of financial services firms in Nigeria
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.32
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #4, pp. 378-388
- 672 Views
-
163 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper examines the intricate link between unobservable characteristics of directors on the corporate board and firm performance. It aims to extend the literature on corporate governance and firm strategic performance from the perspective of emerging African economies. A mix of performance measures were used (Tobin Q, return on assets, and share price) and unobservable characteristics were captured as a stochastic element or heterogeneity of observable board characteristics (board activity, gender diversity, size, and independence). The study applied non-linear generalized auto-regressive conditional heteroscedasticity model to examine the data set consisting of 299 firm-year observations from 23 financial firms listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange from 2006 to 2018. Positive skewness and leptokurtic distribution were found for all the variables. Correlation matrix revealed no multicollinearity, as the highest value was 0.2386. Empirical results suggest that unobservable characteristics significantly and positively influence firm performance as measured by return on assets and share price. This is because the coefficient of the lagged-value of the variance scaling parameter is positive and significant at the 1% level. However, with respect to Tobin Q measure, the result was positive but not significant at the 5% level. Implicitly, the result is sensitive to performance proxies. Accordingly, this study concludes that unobservable characteristics drive firm performance. It is recommended that boards and regulators should pay attention to unobservable characteristics.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M14, G20, G34
-
References40
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variable definition and measurement
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Correlation matrix
- Table 4. Result of the model with Tobin Q as a performance measure
- Table 5. Result of the model with ROA as a performance measure
- Table 6. Result of the model with share price as a performance measure
-
- Abe, I. I., & Mason, R. B. (2016). The role of individual interpersonal relationships on work performance in the South African retail sector. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14(2), 192-200.
- Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in boardroom and impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), 291-309.
- Akpan, E. O., & Amran, N. A. (2014). Board characteristics and company performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(3), 81-89.
- Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2015). Women in corporate boards in Italy: The role of family connections. Corporate Governance an International Review, 23, 1-16.
- Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327.
- Boone, A. L., Casares-Field, L., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66-101.
- Bowe, L., Holden, M. T., & Lynch, P. (2010). Understanding the influence of interpersonal relationship, interpersonal communication patterns and contextual factors on tacit knowledge transfer efficiency in business networks. Waterford Institute of Technology.
- Campbell, K., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 435-451.
- Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 329-356.
- Defond, M. L., Hann, R. N., & Hu, X. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), 153-193.
- Deutsch, M. (2011). Interdependence and psychological orientation. In Conflict, Interdependence and Justice (pp. 247-271). New York: Springer.
- Farag, H., & Mallin, C. (2017). Monitoring corporate boards: Evidence from China. The European Journal of Finance, 22(1), 27-49.
- Fernau, E. (2013). Executive attributes, director attributes, and firm performance. University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Fich, E. M., & Schivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689-724.
- Francis, B., Hassan, I., & Wu, Q. (2015). Professors in the boardroom and their impact on corporate governance and firm performance. Financial Management, 44(3), 547-581.
- Gantenbein, P., & Volonte, C. (2011). Director characteristics and firm performance. University of Basel, Faculty of Business and Economics (Working Paper 11).
- Garcia-Martin, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2018). Board of directors: composition and effect on performance of the firm. Economic Research-Ekonomska, 31(1), 1015-1041.
- Horvath, R., & Spirollari, P. (2012). Do the board of directors’ characteristics influence firm performance? The U.S evidence. Prague Economic Papers 4, 470-486.
- Imade, O. G. (2019). Board gender diversity, non-executive director’s composition and corporate performance: Evidence from listed firms in Nigeria. African Journal of Business and Management, 13(9), 283-290.
- Ironkwe, U., & Adee, G. M. (2014). Corporate governance and financial firms’ performance in Nigeria. Journal of Exclusive Management Science, 3(8), 1-6.
- Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530-541.
- Khanna, P., Jones, C. D., & Boivie, S. (2014). Director human capital, information processing demands, and board effectiveness. Journal of Management, 40(2), 557-585.
- KPMG (2001). Corporate governance in der Schweiz, Verwaltungsrat – Zwischen Verantwortung und Haftung. Zurich: KPMG Fides Management AG.
- Kyere, M., & Ausloos, M. (2020). Corporate governance and firms’ financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 10(1), 1-15.
- Lehn, K. M., Patro, S., & Zhao, M. (2009). Determinants of the size and composition of U.S corporate boards: 1935–2000. Financial Management, 38, 747-780.
- Nguyen, T., Nguyen, A., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2017). Does the human capital of board directors add value to firm? Evidence from an Asian Market. Cogent Economics and Finance, 5, 138-155.
- Olatunji, O. R., & Ojeka, S. (2011). The role of non-executive directors in the profitability of banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(2), 104-127.
- Pereira, V., & Filipe, J. (2014). The board’s attributes and their influence in company performance: A review over the recent literature. International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences, 4(1), 691-702.
- Reio, T. G., & Callahan, J. (2004). Affect, curiosity and socialization related learning: A path analysis of antecedents to job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 3-22.
- Reio, T. G., & Kidd, C. A. (2006). An exploration of the impact of employee job satisfaction, affect, job performance, and organizational financial performance: A review of literature.
- Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Trends and Development: Research on Emotions, 44(4), 695-729.
- Shabbir, M. S. (2018). Women on corporate boards and firm performance, preliminary results from Italian listed companies after the introduction of Gender Quota Law 120/2011. Journal of Business and Financial Affairs, 7(1), 316-321.
- Shrivastav, S. M., & Kalsie, A. (2020). Corporate governance internal board mechanisms and firm performance: A panel level analysis in emerging market. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(9), 2225-22240.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). USA: Pearson Education.
- Toban, C., & Sjahruddin, H. (2016). The antecedent and consequences of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Management, 4(2), 26-33.
- Ujunwa, A. (2012). Board characteristics and the financial performance of Nigerian quoted firms. Corporate Governance, 12(5), 45-55.
- Umar, A. I. & Sani, D. (2020). Effect of corporate governance on the performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. Science Journal of Business and Management, 8(1), 35-40.
- Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 581-606.
- Zakaria, Z., Purhanudin, N., & Palanimally, Y. R. (2014). Board governance and firm performance: A panel data analysis. Journal of Business Law and Ethics, 2(1), 1-12.
- Zehir, C., Sehitoglu, Y., & Erdogan, E. (2012). The effect of leadership and supervisory commitment to organizational performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 58, 207-216.