Unlocking the sustainable value with digitalization: Views of maritime stakeholders on business opportunities
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.33
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #1, pp. 401-417
- Cited by
- 356 Views
-
94 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Digitalization in the maritime sector encompasses interconnected technologies that enhance efficiency, risk mitigation, and safety in marine operations and offshore assets management. Digital twin, or virtual assets, plays a pivotal role within this digital ecosystem. This study aims to explore the transformative potential of digital twins in the maritime industry, focusing on their capacity to improve sustainability, optimize productivity, and drive innovative business models. A quantitative methodology was employed to investigate this potential in the maritime sector, utilizing questionnaires to gather insights and perspectives from key stakeholders in the Northwestern part of Norway’s maritime industry, including ship designers, shipyards, equipment suppliers, and ship owners. Among the 23 respondents, there were individuals holding senior, leadership, management, and specialized digitalization roles. Notably, 65% of these respondents possessed over 20 years of experience in the maritime industry. The survey reveals a strong interest in adopting digital twins within the maritime sector (70% of respondents). The findings underscore the potential advantages of digital twin solutions, including predictive maintenance (16%), real-time operational efficiency enhancements (17%), and design optimization (18%). Nevertheless, implementation complexity (73.9%) and data integration (73.9%) loom significant obstacles. Respondents also recognize the potential for new product opportunities and innovative business models arising from digital twin implementation. Sustainability initiatives are emphasized, particularly in real-time monitoring (83%), retrofitting (74%), and predictive maintenance (65%). Cybersecurity (65%) and data protection (62%) are critical concerns. Furthermore, implementing digital twins is anticipated to promote collaboration and information sharing among maritime industry stakeholders, underscoring their potential for transformative impact.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, O14, Q55
-
References61
-
Tables0
-
Figures9
-
- Figure 1. Interplay between digitalization, digital twin, and servitization, and business model
- Figure 2. Respondent information
- Figure 3. Adopting digital twins
- Figure 4. Anticipated key benefits and challenges of digital twins
- Figure 5. Potential business model structural changes due to the adoption of digital twin
- Figure 6. Potential business model structural changes (within the groups)
- Figure 7. Contribution to sustained performance and optimization
- Figure 8. Data ownership and integrity concerns due to digital technology use
- Figure 9. Supply chain impact and relationship changes due to the adoption of digital twins
-
- Ang, J. H., Goh, C., Saldivar, A. A., & Li, Y. (2017). Energy-efficient through-life smart design, manufacturing and operation of ships in an Industry 4.0 environment. Energies, 10(5), 610.
- Antikainen, M., & Valkokari, K. (2016). A framework for sustainable circular business model innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6, 5-12.
- Bachtijeva, D., Tamulevičienė, D., & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2023). Do socially responsible companies use earnings management more rarely and (or) less aggressively? Evidence from Lithuania. Journal of International Studies, 16(4), 9-26.
- Barth, L., Ehrat, M., Galeno, G., Holler, M., & Savic, N. (2022). Value generation in the product lifecycle with digital twins: Status quo in Swiss companies. Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4528-4537).
- Barth, L., Schweiger, L., Galeno, G., Schaal, N., & Ehrat, M. (2023). Value creation with digital twins: Application-oriented conceptual framework and case study. Applied Sciences, 13(6), 3511.
- Bencsik, A., Szabo, A., & Juhász, T. (2022). Effects of ethnic minority culture on organizational trust and knowledge management. Economics and Sociology, 15(2), 186-203.
- Bohnsack, R., Ciulli, F., & Kolk, A. (2021). The role of business models in firm internationalization: An exploration of European electricity firms in the context of the energy transition. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(5), 824-852.
- Bohnsack, R., Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2014). Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research Policy, 43(2), 284-300.
- Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2023). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9-19.
- Chabowski, B. R., Mena, J. A., & Gonzalez-Padron, T. L. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958–2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 55-70.
- Chávez, C. A. G., Brynolf, S., Despeisse, M., Johansson, B., Rönnback, A. O., Rösler, J., & Stahre, J. (2024). Advancing sustainability through digital servitization: An exploratory study in the maritime shipping industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 436, 140401.
- Chen, Y., Visnjic, I., Parida, V., & Zhang, Z. (2021). On the road to digital servitization – The (dis)continuous interplay between business model and digital technology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(5), 694-722.
- Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529-555.
- Coutinho, F., Dias, A., & F. Pereira, L. (2023). Credibility of social media influencers: Impact on purchase intention. Human Technology, 19(2), 220-237.
- DNV. (n.d.). Standards and recommended practices relevant for digital assets: DNV-RP-A204 Assurance of digital twins.
- Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559-1570.
- Fonseca, I. A., & Gaspar, H. M. (2021). Challenges when creating a cohesive digital twin ship: A data modelling perspective. Ship Technology Research, 68(2), 70-83.
- Gaspar, H. M., Seppäla, L., Koelman, H., & Agis, J. J. G. (2023). Can European shipyards be smarter? A proposal from the SEUS Project. COMPIT’23 Proceedings. Drübeck, Germany.
- Gavalas, D., Syriopoulos, T., & Roumpis, E. (2022). Digital adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 7, 11.
- Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., de Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018a). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 712-721.
- Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2018b). Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 401-416.
- Gennari, F., & Bocchi, E. (2023). The dark side of the circular economy: The value uncaptured in bioeconomy business models. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(4), 516-531.
- Giourka, P., Sanders, M. W. J. L., Angelakoglou, K., Pramangioulis, D., Nikolopoulos, N., Rakopoulos, D., Tryferidis, A., & Tzovaras, D. (2019). The smart city business model canvas – A smart city business modeling framework and practical tool. Energies, 12(24), 4798.
- Goedkoop, M. J., van Halen, C. J. G., te Riele, H. R. M., & Rommens, P. J. M. (1999). Product service system, ecological and economic basic (Report No. 1999/36). Hague: Ministerje van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer.
- Grieves, M. (2002). Completing the cycle: Using PLM information in the sales and service functions. SME Management Forum. Troy, MI.
- Grieves, M. (2006). Product lifecycle management: Driving the next generation of lean thinking. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Irfan, I., Rahman, S., Azis, Y., & Widianto, S. (2023). Defense industry business performance model in developing countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2), 172-186.
- Kadyan, S., Bhasin, N., & Madhukar, V. (2022). Impact of claim settlement procedure of health insurance companies on customer satisfaction during the pandemic: A case of third-party administrators. Insurance Markets and Companies, 13(1), 66-80.
- Koilo, V. (2021). Developing new business models: Logic of network value or cross-industry approach. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(2), 291-307.
- Koilo, V. (2022). Business model for integrated sustainable value creation: A supply chain perspective. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(1), 93-107.
- Kolodiziev, O., Shcherbak, V., Vzhytynska, K., Chernovol, O., & Lozynska, O. (2022). Clustering of banks by the level of digitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(1), 80-93.
- Kuznyetsova, A., Boiarko, I., Khutorna, M., & Zhezherun, Y. (2022b). Development of financial inclusion from the standpoint of ensuring financial stability. Public and Municipal Finance, 11(1), 20-36.
- Kuznyetsova, A., Boiarko, I., Rudevska, V., & Maslov, V. (2022a). Development of business architecture of the banking sector based on public-private partnership. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(2), 150-162.
- Landahl, J., Panarotto, M., Johannesson, H., Isaksson, O., & Lööf, J. (2018). Towards adopting digital twins to support design reuse during platform concept development. Proceedings of the Nord Design (DS 91). Linköping, Sweden.
- Li, X., Cao, J., Liu, Z., & Luo, X. (2020). Sustainable business model based on digital twin platform network: The inspiration from Haier’s case study in China. Sustainability, 12(3), 936.
- Lv, Z., Lv, H., & Fridenfalk, M. (2023). Digital twins in the marine industry. Electronics, 12(9), 2025.
- Lüdeke-Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2019). A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 36-61.
- Madusanka, N. S., Fan, Y., Yang, S., & Xiang, X. (2023). Digital twin in the maritime domain: A review and emerging trends. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(5), 1021.
- Malakuti, S., Schlake, J., Ganz, C., Harper, E. K., & Petersen, H. (2019). Digital twin: An enabler for new business models. Automation Conference.
- Mazur, V., Koldovskyi, A., Ryabushka, L., & Yakubovska, N. (2023). The formation of a rational model of management of the construction companies capital structure. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(53), 128-144.
- Müller, J. M. (2019). Business model innovation in small- and medium-sized enterprises: Strategies for Industry 4.0 providers and users. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1127-1142.
- Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach (Thesis). Université de Lausanne.
- Piascik, R., Vickers, J., Lowry, D., Scotti, S., Stewart, J., & Calomino, A. (2010). Technology area 12: Materials, structures, mechanical systems, and manufacturing road map. In NASA Space Technology Roadmaps and Priorities: Restoring NASA’s Technological Edge and Paving the Way for a New Era in Space. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Podmurnyi, S. (2023, October 23). 4 digital twin challenges to overcome for better business decision-making. Forbes.
- Polinkevych, O., Glonti, V., Baranova, V., Levchenko, V., & Yermoshenko, A. (2021). Change of business models of Ukrainian insurance companies in the conditions of COVID-19. Insurance Markets and Companies, 12(1), 83-98.
- Qi, Q., Tao, F., Zuo, Y., & Zhao, D. (2018). Digital twin service towards smart manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 72, 237-242.
- Renaudin, C. P., Barbier, B., Roriz, R., Revel, D., & Amiel, M. (1994). Coronary arteries: New design for three-dimensional arterial phantoms. Radiology, 190(2), 579-582.
- Seevers, K. D., Badurdeen, F., & Jawahir, I. S. (2013). 2.2 Sustainable value creation through innovative product design. Proceedings of the 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing. Berlin, Germany.
- Seppälä, L. (2020, January 9). Drawingless production in digital data-driven shipbuilding. Cadmatic.
- Shakeel, J., Mardani, A., Chofreh, A. G., Goni, F. A., & Klemeš, J. J. (2020). Anatomy of sustainable business model innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121201.
- Skinner, M. (2023). Mirror, mirror in the walls: Digital twins. U. S. Tech.
- Sorbe, S., Gal, P., Nicoletti, G., & Timiliotis, C. (2019). Digital dividend: Policies to harness the productivity potential of digital technologies (OECD Economic Policy Paper No. 26). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Straková, J., Talíř, M., & Váchal, J. (2022). Opportunities and threats of digital transformation of business models in SMEs. Economics & Sociology, 15(3), 159-171.
- Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.
- Telenkov, D., Krainikova, T., & Yezhyzhanska, T. (2022). Models of TV news layout: Different types of marketing narrative. Innovative Marketing, 18(1), 117-130.
- Timotius, E. (2023). The role of innovation in business strategy as a competitive advantage: Evidence from Indonesian MSMEs. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(1), 92-106.
- University of Cambridge. (n.d.). Digital Twins driving business model innovation.
- World Bank. (2021, January 21). Digitalizing the maritime sector set to boost the competitiveness and resilience of global trade (Press Release).
- ZEWT. (2021). The strategic research and innovation agenda for partnership on zero-emissions waterborne transport.
- Zhang, H., Li, G., Hatledal, L.I., Chu, Y., Ellefsen, A.L., Han, P., Major, P., Skulstad, R., Wang, T., & Hildre, H. P. (2023). A digital twin of the research vessel Gunnerus for lifecycle services: Outlining key technologies. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 30(3), 6-19.
- Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 216-226.