Typology of welfare states: quality criteria for governance and ecology
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(4).2018.20
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #4, pp. 235-245
- Cited by
- 1023 Views
-
212 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In the 21st century, in addition to the generally well-known indicators of material well-being, in the modern paradigm of the welfare state, the quality of the ecological environment is gaining an ever-increasing role. Besides that, the modern definition of welfare state takes into account not only environmental dimension, but also the quality of institutions through the governance system that affects the supply of environmental goods. The study provides the classification of countries according to indicators that can ensure the identification of welfare states and the assessment of the classification role of the criteria for environmental state.
The strong direct correlation between environmental state and government efficiency has been established. The results of the classification of the studied countries obtained by k-means clustering methods indicate the possibility of using the Environmental Performance Index (EPI), Government Effectiveness Index (GEI) and government expenditures indicators as complementary attributes to the classical criteria for the welfare state.
The level of country EPI can be regarded as an important complementary criterion for the welfare state. The country environmental state is much more determined by the government efficiency, the quality of state institutions and their activities, rather than by an extensive increase in the funding of such institutions and environmental measures.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)A13, B22, H23, H53, I31, P50, Q57
-
References37
-
Tables8
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Ordination of countries according to their multidimensional scaling according to EPI, GEI and ExpGov indicators
- Figure 2. Ordination of the countries on the governance efficiency and the share of government expenditures in GDP (the larger diameter of the bubble illustrates the relatively better level of country environmental state)
- Figure 3. Schedule of multiple linear regression model of dependence of country environmental state on the level of government expenditures in GDP and government efficiency
-
- Table 1. Internal and external sources of environmental governance
- Тable 2. Options for “state scale” and government effectiveness: theoretical analysis
- Table 3. Composition and average values of country clusters* by the environmental state, the efficiency of governance and the share of government expenditures in GDP
- Table 4. Generalized results of one-factor dispersion analysis (dependent variable – successively each of indicators, predictor – cluster number)
- Table 5. Correlation matrix of Government Effectiveness Index (GEI), level of government expenditures (ExpGov) and Environmental Performance Index (EPI) of 135 countries
- Table 6. Results of multiple linear regression analysis: regressant – the country environmental state, regressors – the government efficiency and the level of government expenditures in GDP
- Table 7. Results of multiple nonlinear regression analysis: regressant – the country environmental state, regressors – the government efficiency and government expenditures in GDP
-
- Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J., & Thaicharoen, Y. (2003). Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 49-123.
- Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2008). The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
- Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., Jansson, B.-O., Levin, S., Mäler, K.-G., Perrings, C., & Pimentel, D. (1995). Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment. Ecological Economics, 15, 91-95.
- Arvin, M. B., & Byron. L. (2009). Does democracy affect environmental quality in developing countries? Applied Economics, 43(9), 1151-1160.
- Baber, W. F., & Bartlett, R. V. (2005). Deliberative Environmental Politics: Democracy and ecological rationality. Cambridge, MA: MITT Press.
- Bernauer, T., & Betzold, C. (2012). Civil Societyin Global Environmental Governance. The Journal of Environment & Development, 21(1), 62-66.
- Biermann, F., & Pattberg, Ph. H. (2012). Global environmental governance reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Carraro, C. (1997). International Environmental Negotiations: Strategic Policy Issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Cole, M. A. (2007). Corruption, income and the environment: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 62(3-4), 637-647.
- Damania, R. (2002). Environmental control with corrupt bureaucrats. Environment and Development Economics, 7(3), 407-427.
- Dasgupta, P., & Mäler, K.-G. (1997). The Environment and Emerging Development Issues (694 p.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Dluhopolskyi, O. V. (2018). Ecological racism and the movement for environmental justice. In Management of socio-economic development of the state and regions: Collection of materials of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference (26-27.04.2018) (pp. 91-93). Zaporizhzhia: ZNU Publishing House.
- Drakenberg, O., & Slunge, D. (2011). Environmental governance – Input to a new international programme for development cooperation hosted by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Centre for Environment and Sustainability, GMV, University of Gothenburg.
- Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational ecology: environment and political economy. New York: Basil Blackwell.
- Duit, A. (2005). Understanding Environmental Performance of States: An Institution Centered Approach and Some Difficulties (Working Paper Series, 7).
- Duit, A. (2014). State and Environment: The Comparative Study of Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Duit, A. (2016). The four faces of the environmental state: environmental governance regimes in 28 countries. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 69-91.
- Environmental Performance Index (2018). Full Report and Analysis.
- Esfahani, H. S., & Ramirez, M. T. (2003). Institutions, Infrastructure, and Economic Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 70(2), 443-477.
- Gough, I. (2015). Welfare states and environmental states: a comparative analysis. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 24-47.
- Jacobs, M. (1991). The Green Economy: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future. London: Pluto Press.
- Kelman, S. (1996). American Democracy and the Public Good. Harvard University: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
- Koziuk, V., Dluhopolskyi, O., Farion, A., Dluhopolska, T. (2018). Crony Sectors as a Barrier to Economic Well- Being and Ecologization (Case of Ukraine). Economics and Sociology, 11(3), 113-132.
- Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 49, 1-28.
- Lewin, R., & Foley, R. A. (2003). Principles of Human Evolution. Paris: UNESCO.
- Lindner, I., & Strulik, H. (1999). Property Rights and Growth.
- Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Patteberg, Ph. H. (2007). Private institutions and global governance: the new politics of environmental sustainability. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Rodrik, D. (1999). Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks, Social Conflict, and Growth Collapses. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(4), 385-412.
- Rozmahel, P., Kouba, L., Grochova, L., & Najman, N. (2013). Integration of Central and Eastern European Countries: Increasing EU Heterogeneity? Europe, 9, 1-47.
- Scott, B., Graddy, K. (2000). Freedom, growth, and the environment. Environment and Development Economics, 5(4), 433-456.
- SSTU ISO 3166-1 (2009). Codes of the names of countries of the world.
- World Economic Forum (2017). The Inclusive Growth and Development Report.
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project (2018). Interactive data access.
- UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2014).
- World Development Indicators (2017). Central government finances.
- Young, O. R. (1999). The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Causal connections and behavioral mechanisms (342 p.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.