The influence of the central warehouse on the functioning of Polish small and medium-sized enterprises operating in group purchasing organizations
-
Received October 27, 2019;Accepted January 9, 2020;Published January 24, 2020
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.03
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #1, pp. 26-32
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by1 articlesJournal title: WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICSArticle title: Local Currencies Versus the Level of Economic Security of the Region During the COVID-19 PeriodDOI: 10.37394/23207.2020.17.87Volume: 17 / Issue: / First page: 889 / Year: 2020Contributors: Nina Stępnicka, Paulina Wiączek, Dariusz Brzozowiec
-
Funding dataFunder name: Rzeszow University of TechnologyFunder identifier: 813-02-66-999Award numbers: –
- 940 Views
-
205 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Growing competition in the market forces primarily small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to implement certain mechanisms that will allow them to build an advantage over the competition. Most often, SMEs try to work together as part of multi-stakeholder organizations and organize themselves into group purchasing organizations (GPOs) with the central warehouse to improve the financial state of enterprises. The article aims to assess and analyze the impact of the central warehouse on the performance of Polish SMEs operating in group purchasing organizations. The research group comprised of 172 trading enterprises operating in Polish group purchasing organizations. The investigated companies were divided into two groups. In the first group, there were companies operating within GPOs, which have a central warehouse. In the second group, there were companies in which central unit does not have a central warehouse. The analysis and research showed that the central warehouse has a positive impact on financial security of small and medium enterprises operating in group purchasing organizations. The use of central warehouse optimizes the most costly current assets component – inventories. This is confirmed by better results of inventory turnover ratios in days, reduced share of inventories in the structure of current assets, and optimization of financial liquidity ratios.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L10, L20, M21, G31
-
References35
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Average share of inventories in the current assets of the analyzed enterprises
- Table 2. Average results of inventory turnover in days in the analyzed companies in 2015–2017
- Table 3. Average results of financial liquidity in the analyzed companies in 2015–2017
- Table 4. Average results of quick ratio in the analyzed companies in 2015–2017
-
- Blair, R. D., & Durrance, C. P. (2014). Group purchasing organizations, monopsony, and antitrust policy. Managerial Decision Economics, 35(7), 433-443.
- Bove, E., & Arcieri, E. (2016). Motivational, Economic and Social Analysis of an Ethical Purchasing Group Active in Potenza in the Fruit & Vegetable Sector. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 803-806.
- Burns, L. R., & Lee, J. A. (2008). Hospital purchasing alliances: Utilization, services, and performance. Health Care Management Review, 33(3), 203-215.
- Che, T., Peng, Z., & Hua, Z. (2016). Characteristics of online group-buying website and consumers intention to revisit: the moderating effects of visit channel. Electronic Commerce Research, 16(2), 171-188.
- Ding, S., Guariglia, A., & Knight, J. (2013). Investment and financing constraints in China: does working capital management make a difference? Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(5), 1490-1507.
- Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
- Enqvist, J., Graham, M., & Nikkinen, J. (2014). The impact of working capital management on firm profitability in different business cycles: evidence from Finland. Research in International Business Finance, 32, 36-49.
- Essig, M. (2000). Purchasing consortia as symbiotic relationships: developing the concept of “consortium sourcing”. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), 13-22.
- Faes, W., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2000). The pursuit of global purchasing synergy. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(6), 539-553.
- Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J. (1994). The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 291-309.
- Hoffmann, W., & Schlosser, R. (2001). Success factors of strategic alliances in small and medium-sized enterprises, an empirical study. Long Range Planning, 34(3), 357-381.
- Hu, Q., Schwarz, L. B., & Uhan, N. (2012). The Impact of Group Purchasing Organizations on Healthcare-Product Supply Chains. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 14(1), 7-23.
- Inderst, R., & Wey, C. (2007). Buyer power and supplier incentives. European Economic Review, 51(3), 647-667.
- Kauffman, R. J., & Wang, B. (2002). Big together, buy together: On the efficacy of group-buying business models in Internet-based selling. Florida CRC Press.
- Marvel, H. P., & Yang, H. (2008). Group purchasing, nonlinear tariffs, and oligopoly. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(5), 1090-1105.
- Nollet, J., & Beaulieu, M. (2005). Should an organization join a purchasing group? Supply Chain Management, 10(1), 11-17.
- Nollet, J., & Beaulieu, M. (2003). The development of group purchasing: an empirical study in the healthcare sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(1), 3-10.
- Nollet, J., Beaulieu, M., & Fabbe-Costes, N. (2017). The impact of performance measurement on purchasing group dynamics: The Canadian experience. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 23(1), 17-27.
- Picot, A., Ripperger, T., & Wolff, B. (1996). The fading boundaries of the firm: the role of information and communication technology. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152(1), 65-79.
- Polychronakis, Y., & Syntetos, A. (2007). ‘Soft’ supplier management related issues: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 431-449.
- Sandberg, E., & Mena, C. (2015). Exploring strategic strengths and weakness of retail purchasing groups. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 25, 276-297.
- Sarkar, M. B., Echambadi, R., Cavusgil, S. T., & Aulakh, P. S. (2001). The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(4), 358-373.
- Schotanus, F. (2005). Unfair allocation of gains under equal price in cooperative purchasing (pp. 975-986). IPSERA Conference Proceedings, Archamps, France.
- Schotanus, F., & Telgen, J. (2007). Developing a typology of organizational forms of cooperative purchasing. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 13(1), 53-68.
- Schotanus, F., Telgen, J., & de Boer, L. (2010). Critical success factors for managing purchasing groups. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 16(1), 51-60.
- Tella, E., & Virolainen, V. M. (2005). Motives behind purchasing consortia. International Journal of Production Economics, 93-94, 161-168.
- Vahid, T. K., Elham, G., Khosroshahi Mohsen, A., & Mohammadreza, E. (2012). Working capital management and corporate performance: evidence from Iranian companies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1313-1318.
- Vining, A., & Globerman, S. (1999). A conceptual framework for understanding the outsourcing decision. European Management Journal, 17(6), 645-654.
- Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296.
- Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595-613.
- Wooten, B. (2003). Cooperative purchasing in the 21st century. Inside Supply Management, 14(2), 4-7.
- Yang, Ch., Cheng, H. K., Ding, C., & Li, S. (2017). To join or not to join group purchasing organization: A vendor’s decision. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 581-589.
- Zhou, M., Dan, B., Ma, S., & Zhang, X. (2017). Supply chain coordination with information sharing: The informational advantage of GPOs. European Journal of Operational Research, 256, 785-802.
- Zimon, D., & Zimon, G. (2019a). The Impact of Implementation of Standardized Quality Management Systems on Management of Liabilities in Group Purchasing Organizations. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 23(1), 60-73.
- Zimon, G., & Zimon, D. (2019b). The impact of quality management systems on financial liquidity in companies in group purchasing organizations. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 16, 163-170.
-
An assessment of informal SMEs’ potential in an African economy – theoretical and conceptual framework
Herrison Matsongoni , Emmanuel Mutambara doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.07(2).2018.01Public and Municipal Finance Volume 7, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 1-13 Views: 3476 Downloads: 475 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯInformal Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) play a key role in their respective economies over the world particularly in the African continent. This paper reviews various theories on SMEs towards understanding the potential of the informal sector in the context of African countries. The paper uses a theoretical approach for the purpose of assessing the challenges that have affected the development of the informal SMEs sector over the years in both the developing and developed world. Economically developing countries in Africa pose unique challenges to informal SMEs development compared to the developed countries. The paper reviews the theories that define the rise to informality in Africa by identifying the key determinants for the emergence of informal SMEs. A conceptual framework for assessing informal SME’s potential for Africa is developed. The conceptual framework is based on the Fishbone diagram developed by Kaoru Ishikawa (1986). This paper discusses the intricacies of the applicability of the proposed conceptual framework to assess the potential of the informal SMEs in Africa and the way forward for the formalization debate.
-
Challenges of small and medium enterprises during the COVID-19 pandemic: Case of Georgia
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021 Issue #4 pp. 20-28 Views: 3080 Downloads: 1598 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on small and medium enterprises (SMEs). The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on SMEs in Georgia, identify the challenges of SMEs in pandemic conditions, and analyze government economic policy measures. For this purpose, 102 small and medium entrepreneurs from different regions of Georgia were interviewed. The survey was conducted by sending a questionnaire through digital channels. The results were processed using data analysis, quantitative and qualitative research methods, and presented graphically. As a result, key challenges and development directions that are typical for SMEs operations in Georgia during the pandemic were identified. For 60.8% of surveyed SME owners, lockdown is the main challenge. Sales volume of 45.1% of SMEs decreased. In addition, 39.3% of the surveyed SME owners increased the innovative capabilities of a company and 37.2% increased the sales volume of a company through digital channels. The main challenge of the pandemic, lockdown, gave impetus to a change in entrepreneurial behavior. In a pandemic, entrepreneurial activity has become more favorable through digital channels. During the pandemic, there is a need to continue the government’s program of tax incentives and subsidies for SMEs. In addition, the government should promote education in the fields of entrepreneurship, innovation, and technology.
-
Inventory management, cost of capital and firm performance: evidence from manufacturing firms in Jordan
Ashraf Mohammad Salem Alrjoub , Muhannad Akram Ahmad doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(3).2017.01Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 14, 2017 Issue #3 pp. 4-14 Views: 2854 Downloads: 2081 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯSeveral studies have examined the relationship between inventory management and firm performance. However, most of these studies ignore the impact of inventory types on the relationship. Moreover, the relationship is influenced by some factors such as cost of capital which has not been considered. This study examines the moderating effect of cost of capital on the relationship between inventory types and firm performance. The data of 48 firms for the period 2010-2016 which formed 279 firm-year observations were used in this study. With the use of Pearson correlation and panel Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimation, the findings show that inventory management with consideration of its types influence firm performance in the long term. In addition, it is also found that cost of capital moderates the relationship between inventory management and firm performance. However, the interaction between cost of capital and inventory types has different implications. It is suggested that firms should consider cost of capital when making decision on inventory types and align their inventory control to fit in to the changes in their business environment.