The influence of new leadership styles on employee performance in an automotive industry of Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.54
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #2, pp. 592-602
- Cited by
- 769 Views
-
298 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Organizations began adapting to remote working patterns in the early pandemic, while human resource management faces new challenges in adapting to these changes. Leadership is the key to maintaining and improving employee job performance. Therefore, this study aims to find effective new leadership styles for adapting to the new work era. The paper analyzed employee perceptions of the leadership style (transformational, servant, and empowering) and measured their effects on employee job performance in current conditions. The survey was conducted online among 387 employees who had worked for at least five years and at least two years had worked virtually in an automotive manufacturing company in Indonesia that had implemented a virtual work pattern for most of its employees. Then, the data were processed using SEM Amos 25.0. Subsequently, the results showed that employee job performance has two critical dimensions, courtesy and sportsmanship, and is positively and directly influenced by the new leadership style. This study found an effective new leadership style for virtual leadership in the automotive industry with nine dimensions: openness, orientation to problem-solving, freedom at work, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration, coaching, participatory decision-making, and showing concern. The contribution of this study for organizational managers is as a soft reference for functional leadership competencies during the new work period and a new reference for leadership science in human resources management.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M12, L62, O33
-
References52
-
Tables2
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. Standardized fit model
-
- Table 1. Model fit
- Table 2. Hypotheses testing
-
- Akram, M. U., Chauhan, C., Ghosh, K., & Singh, A. (2019). Knowledge management, sustainable business performance and empowering leadership: A firm-level approach. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 15(2), 20-35.
- Armstrong, E., & Cassidy, T. (2019). Psychological capital, authentic leadership, organisational identification and stress in voluntary sector workers: Psychological capital, authentic leadership, organisational identification and stress in voluntary sector workers. American Journal of Business and Society, 4(1), 9-15.
- Banwo, A. O., & Du, J. (2020). When the good outweighs the bad: Organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) in the workplace. Human Resource Development International, 23(1), 88-97.
- Blickle, G., Kranefeld, I., Wihler, A., Kückelhaus, B. P., & Menges, J. I. (2022). It works without words: A nonlinguistic ability test of perceiving emotions with job-related consequences. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(3), 210-223.
- Caputo, A., Pizzi, S., Pellegrini, M. M., & Dabić, M. (2021). Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field. Journal of Business Research, 123, 489-501.
- Cho, J., Schilpzand, P., Huang, L., & Paterson, T. (2021). How and when humble leadership facilitates employee job performance: The roles of feeling trusted and job autonomy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(2), 169-184.
- Colquitt, J., Lepine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2018). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (4th ed.). New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
- Dahleez, K. A., & Abdelfattah, F. A. (2022). Transformational leadership and organizational performance of Omani SMEs: The role of market orientation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(8), 3809-3825.
- Daraba, D., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., Faisal, M., & Wright, L. T. (rev.ed.). (2021). Working from home during the corona pandemic: Investigating the role of authentic leadership, psychological capital, and gender on employee performance. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1885573.
- de Miranda Ribeiro, F., & Kruglianskas, I. (2020). Critical factors for environmental regulation change management: Evidences from an extended producer responsibility case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 119013.
- Ehrnrooth, M., Barner-Rasmussen, W., Koveshnikov, A., & Törnroos, M. (2021). A new look at the relationships between transformational leadership and employee attitudes – Does a high-performance work system substitute and/or enhance these relationships? Human Resource Management, 60(3), 377-398.
- Flavian, C., Guinalíu, M., & Jordan, P. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of trust on a virtual team leader. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 28(1), 2-24.
- Gardner, W. L., Karam, E. P., Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2021). Authentic leadership theory: The case for and against. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101495.
- Garro-Abarca, V., Palos-Sanchez, P., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2021). Virtual teams in times of pandemic: Factors that influence performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
- Gocen, A., & Sen, S. (2021). A validation of servant leadership scale on multinational sample. Psychological Reports, 124(2), 752-770.
- Gui, C., Zhang, P., Zou, R., & Ouyang, X. (2021). Servant leadership in hospitality: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(4), 438-458.
- Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of applied psychology, 55(3), 259.
- Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M., & Patel, V. (2014). AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): Guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2).
- Helmold, M. (2021a). New office concepts in the post COVID-19 times. In New Work, Transformational and Virtual Leadership (pp. 79-89). Springer.
- Helmold, M. (2021b). Transformational leadership in new work organizations. In New Work, Transformational and Virtual Leadership (pp. 67-77). Springer.
- Höddinghaus, M., & Hertel, G. (2021). Trust and leadership: Implications of digitization. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and Communication (pp. 185-203). Springer.
- Isabel, R.-D., David, M.-R., & Gabriel, C.-C. (2021). The effect of servant leadership on employee outcomes: does endogeneity matter? Quality & Quantity.
- Kadarusman, K., & Bunyamin, B. (2021). The role of knowledge sharing, trust as mediation on servant leadership and job performance. Management Science Letters, 11, 1509-1520.
- Khalid, U., Mushtaq, R., Khan, A. Z., & Mahmood, F. (2021). Probing the impact of transformational leadership on job embeddedness: The moderating role of job characteristics. Management Research Review, 44(8), 1139-1156.
- Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2021). The power of empowering leadership: Allowing and encouraging followers to take charge of their own jobs. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(9), 1865-1898.
- Kirchner, K., Ipsen, C., & Hansen, J. P. (2021). COVID-19 leadership challenges in knowledge work. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(4), 493-500.
- Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., . . . Vugt, M. v. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63-77.
- Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131-142.
- Lemoine, G. J., & Blum, T. C. (2021). Servant leadership, leader gender, and team gender role: Testing a female advantage in a cascading model of performance. Personnel Psychology, 74(1), 3-28.
- Levenson, A. (2021). Competencies in an era of digitalised talent management. In S. Wiblen (Ed.), Digitalised Talent Management (pp. 51-78). Routledge.
- Maglione, J. L., & Neville, K. (2021). Servant leadership and spirituality among undergraduate and graduate nursing students. Journal of Religion and Health, 60, 4435-4450.
- Mai, K. M., Welsh, D. T., Wang, F., Bush, J., & Jiang, K. (2022). Supporting creativity or creative unethicality? Empowering leadership and the role of performance pressure. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(1), 111-131.
- Matsunaga, M. (2021). Testing the theory of communication and uncertainty management in the context of digital transformation with transformational leadership as a moderator. International Journal of Business Communication.
- Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2021). Emotional intelligence and servant leadership: A meta-analytic review. Business Ethics: A European Review, 30(2), 231-243.
- Mubarak, N., Khan, J., Yasmin, R., & Osmadi, A. (2021). The impact of a proactive personality on innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(7), 989-1003.
- Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2019). Structural equation modeling. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
- Mukherjee, S., & Mulla, Z. R. (2021). Empowering and directive leadership: The cost of changing styles. Business Perspectives and Research.
- Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
- O’Donoghue, D., & van der Werff, L. (2022). Empowering leadership: Balancing self-determination and accountability for motivation. Personnel Review, 51(4), 1205-1220.
- Pattnaik, S. C., & Sahoo, R. (2021). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behaviour: The role of job autonomy and supportive management. Management Research Review, 44(10), 1409-1426.
- Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133-151.
- Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
- Roberge, V., & Boudrias, J.-S. (2021). The moderating role of employees’ psychological strain in the empowering leadership – Proactive performance relationship. International Journal of Stress Management, 28(3), 186-196.
- Rydén, P., Hossain, M. I., Kottika, E., & Škare, V. (2021). Social media storms: Empowering leadership beyond crisis management. Routledge.
- Shaik, F. F., Makhecha, U. P., & Gouda, S. K. (2021). Work and non-work identities in global virtual teams: Role of cultural intelligence in employee engagement. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 51-78.
- Song, Q., & Chen, Y. (2021). The impact of the fit between needed and received empowering leadership on followers’ job-related outcomes: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(8), 890-903.
- Song, Y., Tian, Q., & Kwan, H. K. (2022). Servant leadership and employee voice: A moderated mediation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37(1), 1-14.
- Tefera, C. A., & Hunsaker, W. D. (2020). Intangible assets and organizational citizenship behavior: A conceptual model. Heliyon, 6(7), e04497.
- Van Seters, D. A., & Field, R. H. (1990). Evolution of leadership theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 3(3), 29-45.
- Van Wart, M., Roman, A., Wang, X. H., & Liu, C. (2019). Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: Identifying the elements of e-leadership. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 80-97.
- Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429-442.
- Widianto, S. (2021). Empowering leadership to performance excellence: The role of knowledge sharing and self-efficacy. International Journal of Business Excellence, 23(3), 297-311.