E-government as a tool to improve the efficiency of public administration: The case of Kazakhstan
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.53
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #2, pp. 578-591
- Cited by
- 693 Views
-
340 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Digitalization contributed to the modernization of public administration, particularly e-government development. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of e-government in improving the efficiency of public administration in Kazakhstan. The research methods are comparative, economic-statistical, and qualitative content analysis. The sources of statistical data were the Bureau of National Statistics, the Committee of public services, the e-government portal, and reports of international organizations and national development institutions. The study determined that e-government is a modern paradigm of public administration that contributes to the efficiency of public administration; its development and efficiency are significantly influenced by financial, economic, technological, and legal factors. Kazakhstan has a high level of e-government development. The e-government development portal in Kazakhstan has contributed to improving public administration, especially during the pandemic. However, e-government requires further development, as its functioning has various issues (low degree of information relevance, insufficient portal filling, and low share of automated functions). At the same time, the readiness of public administration organizations for digital transformation is medium. The study proposes recommendations for Kazakhstan’s e-government development to improve public administration, mainly developing technological infrastructure and digital human capital. The results can contribute to the further e-government development in Kazakhstan and enrich the theoretical base in increasing the efficiency of public administration in the context of digital transformation.
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant “Priorities and mechanisms of inclusive regional development of Kazakhstan in the context of overcoming the economic recession,” IRN AP09259004).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L88, О38
-
References65
-
Tables8
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Stages of e-government development in Kazakhstan
-
- Table 1. Classification of services provided by e-government
- Table 2. Indicators used in the study
- Table 3. E-Government Development Index of Kazakhstan, 2003–2022
- Table 4. Distribution of users of e-government portal services, %, 2015–2021
- Table 5. The purposes for the use of the Internet by Kazakhstani organizations to communicate with government agencies, units, 2016–2021
- Table 6. Performance indicators of Kazakhstan’s e-government platform, 2018–2021
- Table 7. Indicators of the public administration system of Kazakhstan for the e-government platform development, 2018–2021
- Table 8. Indicators of ICT development of public administration organizations, 2019–2021
-
- Adilet. (2021). Ob utverzhdenii Koncepcii razvitija gosudarstvennogo upravlenija v Respublike Kazahstan do 2030 goda [On approval of the Concept of the development of public administration in the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2030]. (In Russian).
- Akorda. (2017). Gosudarstvennaya programma “Tsifrovoy Kazakhstan” [State Program “Digital Kazakhstan”]. (In Russian).
- Alibekova, G., & Bapiyeva, M. (2019). Digitalization processes and their impact on the development of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 4(380), 217-225.
- Alzhanova, F. G., Kireyeva, A. A., Satpayeva, Z. T., Tsoy, A., & Nurbatsin, A. (2020). Analysis of the level of technological development and digital readiness of scientific-research institutes. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 1133-1147.
- Amanbek, Ye., Balgayev, I., Batyrkhanov, K., & Tan, M. (2020). Adoption of e-government in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 46.
- Bach, A., Shaffer, G., & Wolfson, T. (2013). Digital human capital: Developing a framework for understanding the economic impact of digital exclusion in low-income communities. Journal of Information Policy, 3, 247-266.
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNS ASPR RK). (n.d.). Statistics of information and communication technologies.
- Bojović, Ž., Klipa, Ð., Bojović, P. D., Jovanović, I. M., Šuh, J., & Šenk, V. (2023). Interconnected government services: An approach toward smart government. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 1062.
- Committee of Public Services of the Ministry of Defense and the Aerospace Industry of the Republic of Kazakhstan (CPS MDDIAI RK). (n.d.). Elektronnoe pravitelstvo [Electronic governmance]. (In Russian).
- Dobrolyubova, E., Yuzhakov, V., Efremov, A., Klochkova, E., & Talapina, E. (2019). Digital future of public administration based on results (Published Papers). Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. (In Russian).
- Doran, N. M., Puiu, S., Bădîrcea, R. M., Pirtea, M. G., Doran, M. D., Ciobanu, G., & Mihit, L. D. (2023). E-government development – A key factor in government administration efficiency in the European Union. Electronics, 12(3), 641.
- Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., & Huibers, T. (2011). Social media and political participation: are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems? In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, & H. de Bruijn (Eds.), Electronic Participation. ePart 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6847. Springer.
- E-gov.kz. (n.d.). Interesting statistics of the electronic government.
- Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). E-government, internet adoption, and corruption: An empirical investigation. World Development, 57, 114-126.
- Evaluation.egov.kz. (n.d.a). Vzaimodejstvie s grazhdanami [Cooperation with citizens]. (In Russian).
- Evaluation.egov.kz. (n.d.b). Organizacionnoe razvitie [Organizational development]. (In Russian).
- Gascó, M. (2003). New technologies and institutional change in public administration. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 6-14.
- Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2006). Enacting state websites: A mixed method study exploring e-government success in multi-organizational settings. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06). Kauai, HI, USA.
- Goldsmith, L., Shaikh, A. K., Tan, H. Y., & Raahemifar, K. (2022). A review of contemporary governance challenges in Oman: Can blockchain technology be part of sustainable solutions? Sustainability, 14(19), 11819.
- Gov4C. (2019). Annual Report of the Non-profit joint-stock company “State Corporation” Government for Citizens” for 2019. (In Russian).
- Gov4C. (2021). Annual Report of the Non-profit joint-stock company “State Corporation” Government for Citizens” for 2021. (In Russian).
- Grinin, L., Grinin, A., & Korotayev, A. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic as a trigger for the acceleration of the cybernetic revolution, transition from e-government to e-state, and change in social relations. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 175, 121348.
- Hatsu, S., & Ngassam, E. K. (2017). An integrated framework for benchmarking e-government projects. 2017 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa) (pp. 1-9). Windhoek, Namibia.
- Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2014). Usability and credibility of e-government websites. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 584-595.
- Ismailova, R., Baimukhanov, T., & Salmanova, R. (2021). Open government as the main aspects of evaluating the efficiency of interaction between a state body and citizens. The Journal of Economic Research & Business Administration, 136(2), 94-107. (In Russian).
- Jin, S., & Lee, K. (2020). The government R&D funding and management performance: The mediating effect of technology innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 94.
- Kamolov, S., & Aleksandrov, N. (2023). Algorithmic modeling of public recommender systems: Insights from selected cities. Transforming Government: Persons, Process and Policy, 17(1), 72-86.
- Kamolov, S., & Konstantinova, A. (2017). E-government: Way of modernization and efficiency enhancement of public governance. Proceedings of International Conference “Political transformations in modern Europe”, 42(1), 13-21.
- Kamolov, S., & Teteryatnikov, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence in public governance. In I. Stepnov (Ed.), Technology and Business Strategy (pp. 127-135). Springer.
- Kangalakova, D., Dzhanegizova, A., Satpayeva, Z., Nurgaliyeva, K., & Kireyeva, А. (2023). Distribution of knowledge through online learning and its impact on the intellectual potential of PhD students. Journal of Distribution Science, 21(4), 47-56.
- Kapoguzov, E. A., & Suleimenova, G. K. (2017). Performance evaluation of government agencies in the context of strategic management and organizational development in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Ars Administrandi, 9(3), 452-475. (In Russian).
- Kassen, M. (2017). Open data in Kazakhstan: Incentives, implementation and challenges. Information Technology & Persons, 30(2), 301-323.
- Kireyeva, A. A., Nurlanova, N. K., & Kredina, A. A. (2022b). Assessment of the socio-economic performance of vulnerable and depressed territories in Kazakhstan. R-Economy, 8(1), 221-231.
- Kireyeva, A. A., Satpayeva, Z. T., & Urdabayev, M. T. (2022a). Analysis of the digital readiness and the level of the ICT development in Kazakhstan’s regions. Economy of Region, 18(2), 464-478.
- Kneuer, M., & Harnisch, S. (2016). Diffusion of e-government and e-participation in democracies and autocracies. Global Policy Journal, 7(4), 548-556.
- Kumar, R., Sachan, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2017). Qualitative approach to determine user experience of e-government services. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 299-306.
- Kusherov, N. S. (2015). Razvitie “Elektronnogo pravitelstva” v Kazahstane [Development of “electronic government” in Kazakhstan]. Pravo i Sovremennye Gosudarstva – Law and Modern States, 2, 98-102. (In Russian).
- Kushwaha, A. K., Kar, A. K., Roy, S. K., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2022). Capricious opinions: A study of polarization of social media groups. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101709.
- Lee, K., Choi, S.O., Kim, J., & Jung, M. (2018). A study on the factors affecting decrease in the government corruption and mediating effects of the development of ICT and e-government. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 41.
- Maidurova, A. (2013). Control as a method for ensuring quality of public services in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Public Policy and Administration, 12(2), 212-226.
- Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z.A. (2021). Future of e-government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 173, 121102.
- Myeong, S. (2019). E-government to smart e-governance: Korean experience and challenges. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1-8). Cham: Springer.
- OECD. (2003). Promise and problems of e-democracy challenges of online citizen engagement.
- OECD. (2014). Recommendation on digital government strategies.
- OECD. (2017). Reforming Kazakhstan progress, challenges and opportunities.
- Palvia, S. C. J., & Sharma, S. S. (2007). E-government and e-governance: Definitions/domain framework and status around the world. International Conference on E-governance, 5(1), 1-12.
- Panova, A. K. (2020). National project “digital public administration” as a mechanism for ensuring the efficiency of public administration. Scientific and Practical Research, 28(5-6), 63-68. (In Russian).
- Porumbescu, G. A. (2016). Linking public sector social media and e-government website use to trust in government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 291-304.
- Raskin, M. (2017). The law and legality of smart contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 1(304), 305-341.
- Sange Research Center. (2007). Elektronnoe pravitelstvo. Marketingovaja strategija prodvizhenija brenda [Electronic government. Brand promotion marketing strategy]. Astana. (In Russian).
- Sayimer, I. (2015). Electronic government in public administration: An assessment of local government web sites in Turkey. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 7(2), 1-16.
- Scholta, H., Mertens, W., Kowalkiewicz, M., & Becker, J. (2019). From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: An e-government stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 11-26.
- Singh, H., Grover, P., Kar, A. K., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2020). Review of performance assessment frameworks of e-government projects. Transforming Government: Persons, Process and Policy, 14(1), 31-64.
- Singh, H., Kar, A. K., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2017). Performance assessment of e-government projects: A multi-construct, multi-stakeholder perspective. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 558-559).
- Tejedo-Romero, F., Araujo, J. F. F. E., Tejada, A., & Ramírez, Y. (2022). E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities. Technology in Society, 70, 101978.
- Thai, H, Im, H., & Kim, Y. (2019). Pathways to electronic citizen participation: Policy and technological arrangements in Korea. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1-7). Cham: Springer.
- Tokayev, K.-J. (2021). State of the Nation Address by President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev “Unity of the persons and systemic reforms are a solid foundation for the nation’s prosperity”. Official website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
- Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of e-government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167-178.
- United Nations (UN). (2001). Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective.
- United Nations (UN). (2022b). Member States Questionnaire (MSQ) for the United Nations. E-Government Survey 2022: Kazakhstan.
- United Nations (UN). (2022а). E-Government Survey 2022: The Future of Digital Government.
- Venkatesh, V., Hoehle, H., & Aljafari, R. (2017). A usability study of the obamacare web- site: Evaluation and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 199-210.
- Vorobyova, O. A., & Vazhinsky, K. V. (2021). Ways of application of information technologies in the management of state and municipal service. Jurnalul Umanitar Modern, 4(1), 26-29. (In Russian).
- Yakovleva, N. F. (2014). Sociological survey. Moscow: Flinta. (In Russian).
- Yang, H., Kim, S.Y., & Yim, S. (2019). A case study of the Korean government’s preparation for the fourth industrial revolution: Public program to support business model innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(2), 35.