The efficiency of electronic public procurement system in Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.07(3).2018.05
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2018, Issue #3, pp. 43-55
- Cited by
- 1608 Views
-
182 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Public procurement has been the subject of research for a long time in the work of scientists from both the economically developed countries and those undergoing the transformation of public finances. Their research comes from different points of view, namely from the essence of the definition, the process of their conduct, the problems of the legislative framework to their effective implementation. In addition, the issue of electronic public procurement, which can greatly enhance the transparency of this process and reduce the level of corruption inherent in this area in all countries without any exception, is becoming increasingly relevant in recent times.
Based on the conducted analysis, the article proposes the definition of the term of public procurement, defines the principles of public procurement as a controlled subject in the electronic environment of their conduct, and systematizes the basic indicators characterizing the effectiveness of public procurement. Based on the Granger causality method, an analysis of efficiency was performed and the basic indicators determining the level of savings in the public procurement system were determined. It is established that the use of Granger causality in changing the amount of savings in the system of public procurement gives only a quantitative characteristic. For a more complete picture quantitative analysis is supplemented with qualitative parameters.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D60, E60, H41, H83
-
References27
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Principles of public procurement as a controlled subject in an electronic environment
- Table 2. Key indicators that characterize the efficiency of public procurement
- Table 3. Results of stationary research on the volume of savings in public procurement and factors that may affect them
- Table 4. Results of the stationary study of the first differences in the indicators of savings in the public procurement system and the factors that may affect them
- Table 5. Granger causality study for the indicator of saving public procurement (in the first differences)
-
- Amann, M., & Essig, M. (2015). Public procurement of innovation: empirical evidence from EU public authorities on barriers for the promotion of innovation, Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 282-292.
- Bolton, P. (2016). Public Procurement as a Tool to Drive Innovation in South Africa (35 р.). PER/ PELJ, 19.
- Czarnitzki, D., Hünermund, P., & Moshgbar, N. (2018). Public Procurement as Policy Instrument for Innovation. Centre for European Economic Research (Discussion Paper No. 18-001. 40).
- Dmytryshyn, B., Zhovnovach, R., Levchenko, O., Malakhovskyi, Yu., & Gonchar, V. (2018). Practical aspects of assessing the efficiency of the modern system of public procurement in Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 353-363.
- Falko, Yu. (2012). Удосконалення управління системою державних закупівель в умовах модернізації економіки України [Udoskonalennia upravlinnia systemoiu derzhavnykh zakupivel v umovakh modernizatsii ekonomiky Ukrainy]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy, 3, 133-139.
- Flynn, A., & Davis, P. (2014). Theory in public procurement research. Journal of Public Procurement, 14(2), 139-180.
- Fourie, D. (2015). Procurement in the South African public service: a reflection of the ethical and legislative framework. Public and Municipal Finance, 4(2), 38-45.
- Granger, C. W. J. (1974). Investigation Casual Relations by Econometric Methods and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37, 424-438.
- Grown Agents. (2013). Harmonization of the system and state procurement in Ukraine by the standards of SC (Project of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade and Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine).
- Horbatiuk, Ya. V. (2016). Правова характеристика процедур публічних закупівель за Законом України “Про публічні закупівлі” [Pravova kharakterystyka protsedur publichnykh zakupivel za Zakonom Ukrainy “Pro publichni zakupivli”]. Yurydychnyi visnyk. Povitriane i kosmichne pravo, 3, 132-137.
- Krytenko, O., & Danshyna, Yu. V. (2015). Шляхи удосконалення системи державного фінансового контролю за використанням бюджетних коштів [Shliakhy udoskonalennia systemy derzhavnoho finansovoho kontroliu za vykorystanniam biudzhetnykh koshtiv]. Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly kompleksu “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia. Seriia: Derzhavne upravlinnia, 254(242), 74-80.
- Lloyd, R. E., & McCue, C. (2004). What is public procurement? Definitional problems and implications (30 p.). International Public Procurement Conference Proceedings, 3.
- Martin-Ortega, O. (2018). Public Procurement as a Tool for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights: A Study of Collaboration, Due Diligence and Leverage in the Electronics Industry. Business and Human Rights Journal, 3(1), 75-95.
- Naidoo, L., Naidoo, V., & Ambe, M. (2018). Opportunities for Open Contracting in public sector procurement: a review of legislation. Public and Municipal Finance, 7(1), 21-31.
- Nijboer, K., Senden, S., & Telgen, J. (2017). Cross-country learning in public procurement: An exploratory study. Journal of Public Procurement, 17(4), 449-482.
- Olefir, A. O. (2012). Господарсько-правове забезпечення державних закупівель у сфері охорони здоров›я: теоретичні та практичні аспекти [Hospodarsko-pravove zabezpechennia derzhavnykh zakupivel u sferi okhorony zdorovia: teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty] (456 p.). Kharkiv: Yurayt.
- Pinkas, G. I. (2009). Financial and economic mechanism of formation of a competitive market of public procurement (221 p.) (Dissertation). Sumy: UAB NBU.
- Rolfstam, M. (2015). Public procurement of innovation for a better world: a consolidation or a new beginning? Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 211-219.
- Saarela, M., Niinikoski, E.-R., Muhos, M., & Isoherranen, V. (2018). Small and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement in primary social and healthcare services. International Journal of Procurement Management, 11(1), 76-95.
- Sitar, C. P. (2011). The role of the E-Procurement in the purchasing process.
- Smotritskaya, I. I. (2009). Экономика государственных закупок [Ekonomika gosudarstvennykh zakupok] (232 p.). Moscow: Librokom.
- Supplement to the 2011 Annual Statistical Report on United Nations Procurement (2012) (32 р.). UNOPS.
- The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2016). Закон України Про публічні закупівлі № 922-VIII [Zakon Ukrainy Pro publichni zakupivli No. 922-VIII].
- Tkachenko, N. B. (2011). Державні закупівлі [Derzhavni zakupivli] (244 p.). Kyiv: KNTEU.
- Tkachenko, N. B. (2015). Modeling and analysis of the process of public procurement. Statistics of Ukraine, 1.С, 31-35.
- Yuditsky O. L. (2010) Social essence, purpose and objectives of the Institute of Public Procurement in Ukraine. State and Law: Collection of scientific works. Legal and political sciences / Institute of State and Law. V. Koretsky of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. K. Vol. 50. p. 430-435.
- Zvonova, E. (2012). Роль национальных систем страхования депозитов в сохранении финансовой стабильности [Rol natsionalnykh system strakhovaniya depozitov v sokhranenii finansovoy stabilnosti]. Rynok tsinnykh paperiv Ukrainy, 9, 3-10.