Technological orders’ change caused by the pandemics: Digitalization in the internationalization of technology transfer
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.22
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #3, pp. 261-275
- Cited by
- 877 Views
-
314 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The COVID-19 pandemic has become a catalyst for changing the technological order of human development and has accelerated the formation of new forms of organization and business. The change of technological orders causes uneven development of scientific and technological progress, as a result of which the existing technologies deepen, which become dominant and can be superimposed on the existing technological way of life. The purpose of the study is to substantiate changes in technology orders and to analyze the process of digitization as a new trend in the internationalization of technology transfer based on data on the dynamics of business meetings at brokerage events recorded in the Enterprise Europe Network (EEN). The use of EEN IT platform tools and general scientific methods such as analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, and historical analysis has confirmed the differences between the fifth and sixth technological orders and demonstrated the search for new ways of development for small businesses. The study formulated a general strategy for the digitization process and recommendations for the internationalization of technology transfer using Enterprise Europe Network tools in a pandemic, which include intensifying business activities using cyberspace, changing existing forms of organization, and innovation for small businesses. This strategy became the basis for the formation of a new methodological paradigm for managing the process of internationalization of technology transfer, taking into account the peculiarities of the domestic economy in a pandemic.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F02, F62, O31, O32, Q55
-
References27
-
Tables0
-
Figures10
-
- Figure 1. Characteristics of the fifth and the sixth technological orders
- Figure 2. Forming sectors of the “new economy” inside the sixth technological order
- Figure 3. Distribution of the number of events by months in 2019 and 2020 according to the EEN event calendar
- Figure 4. Distribution of the number of brokerage events by months in 2019 and 2020 according to the EEN event calendar
- Figure 5. Monthly number of participants in brokerage events in 2019 and 2020 according to the EEN event calendar
- Figure 6. Monthly number of B2B meetings at brokerage events in 2019 and 2020 according to the EEN event calendar
- Figure 7. Monthly distribution of the number of brokerage events in which Ukrainian participants took part in 2019 and 2020 according to the EEN event calendar
- Figure 8. Monthly distribution of the number of Ukrainian participants in brokerage events in 2019 and 2020 according to the EEN event calendar
- Figure 9. Monthly distribution of the number of the B2B meetings with Ukrainian participants in brokerage events in 2019 and 2020
- Figure 10. Comparative diagram of the total number of brokerage events in which Ukrainians took part and the number of participants from Ukraine in these events in 2019 and 2020
-
- Agostini, L. Caviggioli, F., Galati, F., & Bigliardi, B. (2020). A social perspective of knowledge-based innovation: mobility and agglomeration. Introduction to the special section. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(4), 1309-1323.
- Araújo, A. C., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2013). Determinants of international technology transfer: an empirical analysis of the Enterprise Europe Network (FEP Working Papers).
- Bertosh, E. (2010). Mehanizm mezhdunarodnogo transfera tehnologij [The mechanism of international technology transfer]. Zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij – Journal of International Law and International Relations, 2, 79-83. (In Russian).
- Block, F., & Hirschhorn, L. (1979). New productive forces and the contradictions of contemporary capitalism. Theory and Society, 7, 363-395.
- Bura, A., Humeniuk, B., & Tanasienko, N. (2012). Problemy mizhnarodnoho transferu tekhnolohii v Ukraini [Problems of international technology transfer in Ukraine]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu – Bulletin of Khmelnytskyi National University, 2(1), 184-187. (In Ukrainian).
- Carayannis, E., Grigoroudis, E., & Alexander, J. (2020). In pursuit of smart growth: technology transfer theories, policies and practices. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(6), 1607-1610.
- Cyhn, J. W. (2002). Technology transfer and international production: the development of the electronic industry in Korea. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- De Moortel, K., & Crispeels, T. (2018). International university-university technology transfer: Strategic management framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 145-155.
- Derakhshani, S. (1984). Factors affecting success in international transfers of technology. The Developing Economies, 21(1), 27-47.
- Enterprise Europe Network. (n.d.). Home.
- Fry, L. W. (1982). Technology-Structure Research: Three Critical Issues. The Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 532-52.
- Jakubiak, M., & Chrapowicki, P. (2017). Enterprise Europe Network as an Institution Supporting Smes’ Internationalization – The Case Study. International Journal of Management and Applied Science (IJMAS), 3(11), 43-48.
- Kotlyarevsky, Ya. V., Melnychenko, A. A., Ivanytska, O. M., Semenyuk, E. P., Kniaziev, S. I., & Melnikov, O. V. (2020). New Economy: Evolution of Forms and Research Methodology. Science and Innovation, 16(1), 15-30.
- Kruger, S., & Steyn, A. A. (2020). Enhancing technology transfer through entrepreneurial development: practices from innovation spaces. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 1655-1689.
- Lazebnyk, L. (2018). Didzhytalizatsiia ekonomichnykh vidnosyn yak faktor udoskonalennia biznes-protsesiv pidpryiemstv [Digitalizationof the economic relations as a factor in improving business processes of the enterprise]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk. Seriia: finansy, oblik, opodatkuvannia – Economic Bulletin. Series: Fanance, Accounting, Taxation, 2, 69-74. (In Ukrainian).
- Lee, Y. N. (2020, March 11). 6 charts show the coronavirus impact on the global economy and markets so far. CNBC.
- Melikyan, A. (2010). The Golden Billion.
- Meshko, N. P., & Robota, P. V. (2008). Komercializacija rezuljtativ naukovo-tekhnichnoji dijaljnosti u sferi mizhnarodnogho naukovo-tekhnichnogho obminu [Commercialization of the results of scientific and technical activities in the field of international scientific and technical exchange]. Ekonomichnyi prostir – Economic space, 12(1), 40-46. (In Ukrainian).
- Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. Great Britain: Hodder and Stoughton.
- Radu, S. (2018, November 7). Top Industries To Be Changed By Automation. U.S.news.
- Rachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, C., Vorraber, W., & Schirgi, E. (2019). Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(8), 1143-1160.
- Reddy, N., & Zhao, L. (1990). International technology transfer: A review. Research Policy, 19(4). 285-307.
- Smith, G. V., & Parr, R. L. (2005). Intellectual Property. Valuation, Exploitation, and Infringement Damages (4th ed.). John Wiley.
- Stepanova, A., Bediukh, O., & Novikova, I. (2019). Contradictions of Enterprise Europe Network Using in Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 190-202.
- Sykes, A. O. (2021). The Law and Economics of “Forced” Technology Transfer and Its Implications for Trade and Investment Policy (and the U.S.–China Trade War). Journal of Legal Analysis, 13(1), 127-171.
- Taleb, N. (2008). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Penguin.
- Yang, Y., McKhann, A., Chen, S., Harling, G., & Onnela, J.-P. (2019). Efficient vaccination strategies for epidemic control using network information. Epidemics, 27, 115-122.