Tax policy and activation of internal factors of economic growth: EU experience for Ukraine
-
Author(s)Olena DobrovolskaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4159-8446
,
Ralph SonntagLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1976-4775
,
Svitlana KachulaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2540-862X
,
Liubov LysiakLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2948-7089
,
Pavlo LastovchenkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0458-4199
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.13(1).2024.06
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2024, Issue #1, pp. 70-82
- Cited by
- 206 Views
-
42 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The state policy of Ukraine aims to promote sustainable economic growth and improve its quality through economic activity, particularly through the optimization of the tax system, which is particularly relevant both during the period of martial law in Ukraine and the post-war recovery. The purpose of the study is to assess the formation and implementation of the state tax policy to activate the internal factors of economic growth in Ukraine under martial law. The study of tax policy in Ukraine and EU countries has shown that the EU countries are characterized by a consistent and transparent tax policy that stimulates investment, innovation, and entrepreneurship to activate internal factors of economic growth. The paper uses fiscal analysis based on the Cobb-Douglas production-institutional function; its main concept is the mutual location of the Laffer points of the first and second types and the actual level of the tax burden. The results show a noticeable adjustment of the real fiscal climate in Ukraine in line with changes in threshold fiscal standards. Considering martial law in Ukraine and the need for the state’s ability to post-war recovery, the study suggests changing the rates of specific taxes, after which it is necessary to make a transition from private fiscal instruments with inherent rate values to the aggregate fiscal burden.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Н30, O10
-
References36
-
Tables2
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Fulfillment of targets for tax revenues of the consolidated, state, and local budgets of Ukraine in 2020–2023
- Figure 2. Tax burden in the European Union member states (France, Germany, Denmark, Greece, Belgium, Sweden, Latvia, Poland, Bulgaria, and Croatia) and Ukraine in 2000–2021, %
- Figure 3. Laffer points of the 1st and 2nd kinds and the actual burden on the Ukrainian economy
- Figure 4. Capital elasticity
- Figure 5. Labor elasticity
-
- Table 1. Input information on forecasting the economic development of Ukraine based on the Cobb-Douglas production-institutional function
- Table 2. Fiscal and technological indicators of the Ukrainian economy
-
- Andrejovska, A., Glova, J., & Tulai, O. (2020). Investment allocation in Slovakia and Ukraine in terms of effective corporate tax rates. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(3), 332-344.
- Barannyk, L., Dobrovolska, O., Taranenko, V., Koriahinа, T., & Rybalchenko, L. (2021). Personal income tax as a tool for implementing state social policy. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(2), 287-297.
- Blanchard, O. (2023). Fiscal policy under low interest rates. The MIT Press.
- Boiko, S., Nehrey, M., Davydenko, N., & Karbivskyi, V. (2023). Tax Sustainability in Ukraine: A Case of Agricultural Companies. Economies 2023, 11(1), 6.
- Chagovets, L. A. (2013). Modelling production and fiscal effects in the system of economic security of a state. Business Inform, 10, 130-134. (In Russian).
- Chugunov, I., & Pasichnyi, M. (2018). Fiscal stimuli and consolidation in emerging market economies. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(4), 113-122.
- Chugunov, I., Makohon, V., Titarchuk, M., & Кrykun, T. (2023). The budget policy of Ukraine under martial law. Public and Municipal Finance, 12(1), 1-11.
- Cobb, C. W., & Douglas, P. H. (1928). A theory of production. The American Economic Review, 18(1), 139-165.
- Davydenko, N., Titenko, Z., Shevchuk K., & Buriak, A. (2022). Environmental taxation: Ukrainian realities and European practice. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, 1948-1955.
- De Abreu, H. M. de O. C. P., Brandão, E. F. M., & Pereira, S. C. A. (2014). Crossing mountains: The effect of competition of the Laffer curve (FEP Working Papers 523). Porto: School of Economics and Management, University of Porto.
- Eurostat Statistics Explained. (2023, October 26). Tax revenue statistics.
- Faria e Castro, M. (2021). Fiscal policy during a pandemic (Working Paper No. 2020-006). Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
- Glushchenko, J., & Kozhalina, N. (2019). Development trends of local taxes in the system of local budgets in Ukraine. Public and Municipal Finance, 8(1), 104-111.
- Kushnirchuk, Yu. М. (2010). The excess tax burden optimization with purpose of economic safety. Naukovyj visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 20(11), 161-169. (In Ukrainian).
- Laffer, A. B. (2004). The Laffer curve: Past, present and future. The Heritage Foundation Publications, 1765, 1-16.
- Lee, N., & Swenson, Ch. (2018). Empirical evidence on the impact of recent Korean tax reforms. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(4), 35-47.
- Lysiak, L., Hrabchuk, O., Kachula, S., & Shchyryi, H. (2022). Research of dynamics and forecasting the budget incomes from excise taxation: The Ukraine experience. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(44), 51-62.
- Lysiak, L., Kachula, S., Hrabchuk, O., Filipova, M., & Kushnir, A. (2020). Assessment of financial sustainability of the local budgets: Case of Ukraine. Public and Municipal Finance, 9(1), 48-59.
- Lysiak, L., Kachula, S., Kushnir, A., Datsenko, V., & Tereshchenko T. (2021). Assessment of financial sustainability of local budgets in the budget management system using Kohonen maps. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(6), 1558-1570.
- Merkulova, T. V. (2007). Snizhenie nalogovoy nagruzki i effekt Laffera: Argumenty i zabluzhdeniya [Reducing the tax burden and the Laffer effect: Arguments and misconceptions]. Kharkiv: ID “INZhEK”. (In Russian).
- Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (n.d.). Budget policy.
- Odintsov, O., Yevtukhova, T., Vasylkonova, E., & Kunchenko-Kharchenko, V. (2020). Influence of tax burden on economic development of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 7(1), 150-162.
- OECD.Stat. (n.d.). Revenue Statistics – OECD countries: Comparative tables.
- Open Budget. (2024). Dokhody [Income]. (In Ukrainian).
- Otekunrin, A. O., Nwanji, T. I., Eluyela, D. F., Inegbedion, H., & Eleda T. (2021). E-tax system effectiveness in reducing tax evasion in Nigeria. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 175-185.
- Papava, V. (2002). The Laffer effect in the post-communist economy (On the bases of the observation of Russian literature). Problems of Economic Transition, 45(7), 63-81.
- Pasichnyi, M. (2017). Empirical study of the fiscal policy impact on economic growth. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(3), 316-322.
- Serikova, M., Sembiyeva, L., Mussina, A., Kuchukova, N., & Nurumov, A. (2018). The institutional model of tax administration and aspects of its development. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(3), 283-293.
- Slemrod, J. (1990). Optimal taxation and optimal tax systems. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(1), 157-178.
- Storonyanska, I, Patytska, K., Medynska, T., Benovska, L., Kliuchnyk L., & Nestor, O. (2023). Systemic prerequisites for shaping the local budgets’ tax revenue: the case study of developed countries. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(53), 58-69.
- Trabandt, M., & Uhlig, H. (2011). The Laffer curve revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(4), 305-327.
- Trabandt, M., & Uhlig, H. (2012). How do Laffer curves differ across countries? (Working Paper No. 17862) NBER.
- Trung, T., & Van Tan, N. (2020). Tax incentive policy and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(2), 277-296.
- Turyanskyy, Y., Svydruk, I., Sydorchuk, O., Mitsenko, N., & Klepanchuk, O. (2020). Management priorities of tax reform in Ukraine: Implementation of international experience. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(2), 320-333.
- Varotsis, N., & Katerelos, I. (2018). Models of tax planning simulation: The case of Greece. Open Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 6(3), 27-44.
- Zatonatska, T. G., & Stavytskyi, A. V. (2006). Approaches to the analysis of the fiscal policy of Ukraine (1998–2004). Finansy Ukrainy, 2006(2), 68-77. (In Ukrainian).
-
Impact on poverty and income inequality in Malaysia’s economic growth
Rabiul Islam ,
Ahmad Bashawir Abdul Ghani ,
Irwanshah Zainal Abidin ,
Jeya Malar Rayaiappan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.05
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 55-62 Views: 11846 Downloads: 5652 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯPoverty and income inequality are extreme issues that still exist in Malaysia. Any rise in poverty and income inequality definitely affect economic growth. There are many great efforts taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and to reduce the gap of income inequality which occurs since 1970’s. The incidence of poverty and income inequality is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas. This paper is mainly to study the level of poverty and income inequality in Malaysia together with government intervention to develop Malaysia’s economic growth. The research is focused among the working people at Ipoh, Perak. In this paper, questionnaire forms are being distributed to get information regarding the issue of poverty and income inequality. It also looks into the strategies taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and income inequality. Few recommendations are given in terms of education policy, financial aid and assistance from government and non-government organization (NGO) to upgrade the standard and quality of living among the poor and lower-income group of people.
-
Impact of inflation on economic growth: evidence from Nigeria
Anthony Olugbenga Adaramola ,
Oluwabunmi Dada
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.01
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 1-13 Views: 8998 Downloads: 5249 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn an attempt to examine the influence of inflation on the growth prospects of the Nigerian economy, the study employs the autoregressive distributed lag on the selected variables, i.e. real gross domestic product (GDP), inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate, degree of economy`s openness, money supply, and government consumption expenditures for the period 1980–2018. The study findings indicate that inflation and real exchange rate exert a significant negative impact on economic growth, while interest rate and money supply indicate a positive and significant impact on economic growth. Other variables in the model depict no influence on the economic growth of Nigeria. The causality result shows the unidirectional relationships between interest rate, exchange rate, government consumption expenditures and gross domestic product. However, inflation and the degree of openness show no causal relationship with gross domestic product. As a result, the study recommends that a more pragmatic effort is needed by the monetary authorities to target the inflation vigorously to prevent its adverse effect by ensuring a tolerable rate that would stimulate the economic growth of Nigeria.
-
Formalization of the impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources on economic growth of countries in Central and Eastern Europe
Serhiy Kozmenko ,
Maxim Korneyev
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(1).2017.06
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 48-58 Views: 7839 Downloads: 1371 TO CITEThe article deals with the impact of financialization on economic growth in countries of Central and Eastern Europe. It determinesthe impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization on economic growth of these countries. It proves that the implementation of measures aimed at increasing the openness of the economy and maintaining solvent demand have a positive impact on economic growth of the surveyed countries in the long run. It also proves the importance of developing a set of measures of strategic nature regulating imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization.
