Fiscal policy and economic growth in resource-rich country: Empirical evidence from Azerbaijan
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.13(1).2024.07
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2024, Issue #1, pp. 83-94
- 230 Views
-
43 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The relationship between fiscal policy and economic growth is one of the longest-lived economic discourses. In this context, countries with emerging institutions and resource-based economies are of particular interest. Therefore, the Azerbaijani economy was chosen as the object of study. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between fiscal policy and economic growth in Azerbaijan and analyze the possible existence of the BARS curve relationship in Azerbaijan. The study covers quarterly data for 2005Q1–2023Q2. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bound test is used to evaluate the relationship between fiscal variables and economic growth (both general and non-oil), as well as the BARS curve relationship. The analysis revealed a positive association between government spending and both overall and non-oil economic growth over the long term. On average, a 1% rise in government spending corresponds to a 0.6% increase in economic growth. Conversely, in the short term, a negative relationship is observed between government spending and economic growth, encompassing both the general and non-oil economy. Notably, no statistical evidence supporting the presence of the BARS curve relationship in Azerbaijan was identified. Amid the circumstances of decreasing oil production in Azerbaijan, these results put more emphasis on the importance of increasing the productivity of government spending.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G28, E62, O23
-
References43
-
Tables7
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variable description
- Table 2. ADF test results
- Table 3. Selection of optimal models
- Table 4. F-bounds test results (Null hypothesis: No level relationship)
- Table 5. Long-run estimate results and robustness check results
- Table 6. Model 1: Short-run estimate results
- Table 7. Model 2: Short-run estimate results
-
- Abbasov, J. A., & Aliyev, K. (2018). Testing Wagner’s law and Keynesian hypothesis in selected post Soviet countries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(5), 1227-1237.
- Agell, J., Ohlsson, H., & Thoursie, P. S. (2006). Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries: A comment. European Economic Review, 50(1), 211-218.
- Aliyev, K., & Nadirov, O. (2016). How fiscal policy affects non-oil economic performance in Azerbaijan? Academic Journal of Economic Studies, 2(3), 11-29.
- Aliyev, K., Dehning, B., & Nadirov, O. (2016). Modelling the impact of fiscal policy on non oil GDP in a resource rich country: Evidence from Azerbaijan. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(6), 1869-1878.
- Altunc, O. F., & Aydın, C. (2013). The relationship between optimal size of government and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 66-75.
- Armey, R. K. (1995). The freedom revolution: The new Republican house majority leader tells why big government failed, why freedom works, and how we will rebuild America. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing.
- Asimakopoulos, S., & Karavias, I. (2015). The impact of government size on economic growth: A threshold analysis. Economic Letters, 139, 65-68.
- Barro, R. (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103-125.
- Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1329-1368.
- Christie, T. (2014). The effect of government spending on economic growth: Testing the non-linear hypothesis. Bulletin of Economic Research, 66(2), 183-204.
- De Castro, F., & Hernandez de Cos, P. (2008). The economic effects of fiscal policy: The case of Spain. Journal of Macroeconomics, 30(3), 1005-1028.
- De Mendonça, H. F., & Cacicedo, T. (2015). Size of government and economic growth in the largest Latin American country. Applied Economics Letters, 22(11), 904-910.
- Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V., & Zou, H. (1996). The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37(2), 313-344.
- Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
- Durucan, A. (2022). Testing the validity of BARS curve for Turkey. Economic Annals, 67(232), 153-192.
- Easterly, W., & Rebelo, S. (1993). Fiscal policy and economic growth: An empirical investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 417-458.
- Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (n.d.). Federal Reserve Economic Data. (Brent oil prices were retrieved from Federal Reserve Economic Data).
- Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED). (n.d.). Global price of Brent Crude.
- Forte, F., & Magazzino, Z. (2016). Government size and economic growth in Italy: A time-series analysis. European Scientific Journal, 12(7), 149-169.
- Frimpong, J. M., & Oteng-Abayie, E. F. (2006). Bivariate causality analysis between FDI inflows and economic growth in Ghana (MPRA Paper No. 351). Munich Personal RePEc Archive, University of Munich, Germany.
- Georgeta, V., Gherghina, S. C., & Chiricu, S. C. (2021). Does fiscal policy influence the economic growth? Evidence from OECD countries. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 55(2), 229-246.
- Hajamini, M., & Falahi, M. A. (2018). Economic growth and government size in developed European countries: A panel threshold approach. Economic Analysis and Policy, 58, 1-13.
- Hamdi, H., & Sbia, R. (2013). Dynamic relationships between oil revenues, government spending and economic growth in an oil-dependent economy. Economic Modelling, 35, 118-125.
- Hasanov, F. (2013). The role of the fiscal policy in the development of the non-oil sector in Azerbaijan. Hazar Raporu, 4, 162-173.
- Hasanov, F., Mikailov, J., Yusifov, S., Aliyev, K., & Talishinskaya, S. (2019). The role of social and physical infrastructure spending in tradable and non-tradable growth. Contemporary Economics, 13(1), 79-98.
- Herath, S. (2010). The size of the government and economic growth: An empirical study of Sri Lanka (Discussion Papers No. 2010/05). Vienna: WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
- Ibrahimov, Z., Hajiyeva, S., Seyfullayev, I., Mehdiyev, U., & Aliyeva, Z. (2023). The impact of infrastructure investments on the country’s economic growth. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2), 415-425.
- Kim, D., Lin, S., & Wu, Y. (2018). Heterogeneity in the effects of government size and governance on economic growth. Economic Modelling, 68, 205-216.
- Narayan, P. K. (2004). An econometric model of tourism demand and a computable general equilibrium analysis of the impact of tourism: The case of the Fiji islands. Monash University.
- Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979-1990.
- Olaoye, O. O., Eluwole, O. O., Ayesha, A., & Afolabi, O. O. (2020). Government spending and economic growth in ECOWAS: An asymmetric analysis. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 22, Article e00180.
- Olayungbo, D. O., & Olayemi, O. F. (2018). Dynamic relationships among non-oil revenue, government spending and economic growth in an oil producing country: Evidence from Nigeria. Future Business Journal, 4(2), 246-260.
- Olukayode, M. E. (2009). Does government spending spur economic growth in Nigeria? (MPRA Paper No. 17941). Munich Personal RePEc Archive, University of Munich, Germany.
- Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
- Rahn, R., & Fox, H. (1996). What is the optimum size of government? Vernon K. Krieble Foundation.
- Scully, G. (1994). What is the optimal size of government in the United States? (NCPA Policy Report No. 188). Dallas: National Center for Policy Analysis.
- Seyfullayev, I. (2020). Protectionism and non-resource economic growth: Evidence from Azerbaijan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 121-129.
- Seyfullayev, I. (2022). Trade openness and economic growth: Evidence from Azerbaijan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(1), 564-572.
- Seyfullayev, I. (2023). Financial development and non-resource economic growth: Empirical evidence from Azerbaijan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(4), 253-263.
- Seyfullayev, I., & Seyfullali, R. (2023). The impact of financial development on the manufacturing industry in resource-rich countries: Empirical evidence from Azerbaijan. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 10(3), 478-486.
- Sosvilla-Rivero, S., & Rubio-Guerrero, J. J. (2022). The economic effects of fiscal policy: Further evidence for Spain. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 86, 305-313.
- Sulaiman, D. M., & Muhammad, U. (2010). The bound testing approach for cointegration and causality between financial development and economic growth in case of Pakistan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(4), 525-531.
- Zagler, M., & Dürnecker, G. (2003). Fiscal policy and economic growth. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(3), 397-418.
-
Impact on poverty and income inequality in Malaysia’s economic growth
Rabiul Islam
,
Ahmad Bashawir Abdul Ghani ,
Irwanshah Zainal Abidin ,
Jeya Malar Rayaiappan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.05
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 55-62 Views: 12038 Downloads: 5746 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯPoverty and income inequality are extreme issues that still exist in Malaysia. Any rise in poverty and income inequality definitely affect economic growth. There are many great efforts taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and to reduce the gap of income inequality which occurs since 1970’s. The incidence of poverty and income inequality is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas. This paper is mainly to study the level of poverty and income inequality in Malaysia together with government intervention to develop Malaysia’s economic growth. The research is focused among the working people at Ipoh, Perak. In this paper, questionnaire forms are being distributed to get information regarding the issue of poverty and income inequality. It also looks into the strategies taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and income inequality. Few recommendations are given in terms of education policy, financial aid and assistance from government and non-government organization (NGO) to upgrade the standard and quality of living among the poor and lower-income group of people.
-
Impact of inflation on economic growth: evidence from Nigeria
Anthony Olugbenga Adaramola ,
Oluwabunmi Dada
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.01
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 1-13 Views: 9348 Downloads: 5625 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn an attempt to examine the influence of inflation on the growth prospects of the Nigerian economy, the study employs the autoregressive distributed lag on the selected variables, i.e. real gross domestic product (GDP), inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate, degree of economy`s openness, money supply, and government consumption expenditures for the period 1980–2018. The study findings indicate that inflation and real exchange rate exert a significant negative impact on economic growth, while interest rate and money supply indicate a positive and significant impact on economic growth. Other variables in the model depict no influence on the economic growth of Nigeria. The causality result shows the unidirectional relationships between interest rate, exchange rate, government consumption expenditures and gross domestic product. However, inflation and the degree of openness show no causal relationship with gross domestic product. As a result, the study recommends that a more pragmatic effort is needed by the monetary authorities to target the inflation vigorously to prevent its adverse effect by ensuring a tolerable rate that would stimulate the economic growth of Nigeria.
-
Formalization of the impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources on economic growth of countries in Central and Eastern Europe
Serhiy Kozmenko ,
Maxim Korneyev
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(1).2017.06
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 48-58 Views: 7973 Downloads: 1381 TO CITEThe article deals with the impact of financialization on economic growth in countries of Central and Eastern Europe. It determinesthe impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization on economic growth of these countries. It proves that the implementation of measures aimed at increasing the openness of the economy and maintaining solvent demand have a positive impact on economic growth of the surveyed countries in the long run. It also proves the importance of developing a set of measures of strategic nature regulating imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization.
