Relationship between corporate governance and intellectual capital: Evidence from Jordan
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.04
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 39-50
- 134 Views
-
43 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between corporate governance and intellectual capital within Jordanian manufacturing firms. This study used a sample of Jordanian manufacturing firms and applied regression analysis to test the effects of board size, executive director duality, percentage of independent directors, and ownership concentration on intelligence capital performance. Thus, 64 Jordanian listed manufacturing firms represent the study sample for the study period (2014–2022). The study employs advanced statistical methods to evaluate how these governance mechanisms affect intellectual capital, including human, structural, and relational capital. The study results indicate that the board size and CEO duality had no significant impact on intellectual capital performance. A positive significant determinant is the firm performance measured by earnings per share with a coefficient estimate of 6.331 at p-value <0.0. The significant positive effect of firm performance on intellectual capital performance indicates that financial health is an important driver of intellectual capital utilization. Good firms are likely to have more resources to invest in human capital, technology, and innovation, which are necessary components of intellectual capital. Future research should continue to explore these dynamics across different contexts to inform more effective governance and management practices.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L25, G34, M12
-
References33
-
Tables7
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Pearson matrix
- Table 3. Regression analysis: Model 1
- Table 4. Regression analysis: Model 2
- Table 5. Regression analysis: Model 3
- Table 6. Autocorrelation
- Table 7. Multicollinearity
-
- Abualoush, S., Bataineh, K., & Alrowwad, A. A. (2018). The role of knowledge management process and intellectual capital as intermediary variables between knowledge management infrastructure and organization performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 13, 279-309.
- Al-Fayoumi, N. A., & Abuzayed, B. M. (2009). Ownership structure and corporate financing. Applied Financial Economics, 19(24), 1975-1986.
- Alodat, A. Y., Hao, Y., Nobanee, H., Ali, H., Mansour, M., & Al Amosh, H. (2024). Board characteristics and cybersecurity disclosure: Evidence from the UK. Electronic Commerce Research.
- Alvino, F., Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R., & Palladino, R. (2021). Intellectual capital and sustainable development: A systematic literature review. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(1), 76-94.
- Anghel, I., Siminică, M., Cristea, M., Sichigea, M., & Noja, G. G. (2018). Intellectual capital and financial performance of biotech companies in the pharmaceutical industry. Amfiteatru Economic, 20(49), 631-646.
- Ariff, A. H. M., van Zijl, T., & Islam, A. (2016). Intellectual capital and market performance: The case of multinational R&D firms in the US. The Journal of Developing Areas, 5, 487-495.
- Cadbury, A. (2002). Corporate governance and chairmanship: A personal view.
- Chen, M. C., Cheng, S. J., & Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 159-176.
- Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 1-33.
- Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371-382.
- Eissawi, N., & Eltahan, E. (2018). Intellectual capital as a variable intermediary between the quality of working life and methodology of six-sigma application to the employees in the Ministry of Health in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Arab Journal of Administration, 38(3), 189-214.
- Forte, W., Tucker, J., Matonti, G., & Nicolò, G. (2017). Measuring the intellectual capital of Italian listed companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(4), 710-732.
- Haris, M., Yao, H., Tariq, G., Malik, A., & Javaid, H. M. (2019). Intellectual capital performance and profitability of banks: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(2), Article 56.
- Lari Dashtbayaz, M., Salehi, M., Mirzaei, A., & Nazaridavaji, H. (2020). The impact of corporate governance on intellectual capitals efficiency in Iran. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(4), 749-766.
- Lin, C. (2018). Intellectual capital of South Africa: A comparison with Poland and Romania. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(3), 498-518.
- Malkawi, B. H. (2009). A practitioner’s guide to the Jordanian securities law. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 42(1), 36-72.
- Mansour, M., Al Zobi, M., E‘leimat, D. A., Abu Alim, S., & Marei, A. (2024). Board gender diversity and bank performance in Jordan. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(1), 183-194.
- Mansour, M., Al Zobi, Saram, M., Daoud, L., & Marei, A. (2023). Does executive compensation matter to bank performance? Experimental evidence from Jordan. Banks and Bank Systems, 18(3), 164-176.
- Mansur, H., & Tangl, A. (2018). The effect of corporate governance on the financial performance of listed companies in Amman stock exchange (Jordan). Journal of Advanced Management Science, 6(2), 97-102.
- Nawaz, T., & Haniffa, R. (2017). Determinants of financial performance of Islamic banks: An intellectual capital perspective. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(2), 130-142.
- Pulic, A. (2000). VAIC – An accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5-8), 702-714.
- Regina, R. (2021). The influence of intellectual capital, good corporate governance and accounting conservatism on company’s financial performance. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research, 3(1).
- Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2003). Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms: A study of the resource-based and stakeholder views. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(2), 215-226.
- Shubita, Moh. (2024). The relationship between sales growth, profitability, and tax avoidance. Innovative Marketing, 20(1), 113-121.
- Shubita, Moa., & Shubita, Moh. (2010). The incremental information content of earnings management. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 48, 62-73.
- Shubita, Moh. (2021). Predictive value of accruals and the moderating role of company size: Empirical evidence from Jordan. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(3), 142-150.
- Shubita, Moh. F. (2023). The relationship between return on investment and Jordanian banks value. Banks and Bank Systems, 18(1), 139-149.
- Tahir, M., Shah, S. Q. A., Khan, M. M., & Afridi, M. A. (2018). Intellectual capital and financial performance of banks in Pakistan. The Dialogue, 8(1), 105-117.
- Tarigan, J., Listijabudhi, S., Hatane, S. E., & Widjaja, D. C. (2019). The impacts of intellectual capital and financial performance: An evidence from Indonesian manufacturing industry. Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 65-76.
- Xu, X. L., Li, J., Wu, D., & Zhang, X. (2021). The intellectual capital efficiency and corporate sustainable growth nexus: Comparison from agriculture, tourism and renewable energy sector. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(11), 16038-16056.
- Youndt, M. A., Subramaniam, M., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Intellectual capital profiles: An examination of investments and returns. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 335-361.
- Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291-334.
- Zéghal, D., & Maaloul, A. (2010). Analyzing value added as an indicator of intellectual capital and its consequences on company performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(1), 39-60.