Relational Capital and financial performance: an empirical analysis on a sample of Italian firms

  • Received November 25, 2017;
    Accepted February 8, 2018;
    Published March 14, 2018
  • Author(s)
    Gianpaolo Iazzolino
    ORCID , Federica Chiappetta , Stefano Chiappetta
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.24
  • Article Info
    Volume 16 2018, Issue #1, pp. 245-258
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    5 articles
  • 1638 Views
  • 321 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

The aim of this paper is to study the relations existing between the relational capital, both internal and external, and the firm financial performance. The investigation has been carried out on quantitative and qualitative data extracted from a sample of 100 Italian large firms. The paper deeply analyzes the dimension of the internal relational capital, not so widely studied in the literature. Findings demonstrate the influence of the internal relational capital (IRC) and of the external relational capital (ERC) on performance. The research suggests that an effort has to be devoted not only to improving relations with external stakeholders, but also to developing intra-firm relations. The research contributes to studies in management and in particular in internal organization by demonstrating that designing and implementing systems for supporting internal relation can improve firm performance.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Research framework
    • Figure 2. Results of regression within IRC variables
    • Figure 3. Framework of relations with β coefficients
    • Table 1. Scale used for qualitative assessment
    • Table 2. Variables of the internal and external relational capital
    • Table 3. The financial performance indicators considered
    • Table 4. Collinearity diagnosis on IRC variables
    • Table 5. Collinearity diagnosis on ERC variables
    • Table 6. Overview of model 1.2
    • Table 7. ANOVA of model 1.2
    • Table 8. T-test and estimation of regression coefficients for model 1.2
    • Table 9. Overview of model A
    • Table 10. ANOVA of model A
    • Table 11. T-test and estimation of regression coefficients for model A
    • Table 12. Overall regression analysis results
    • Alipour, M. (2012). The effect of intellectual capital on firm performance: an investigation of Iran insurance companies. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(1), 53-66.
    • Baiburina, E. R., & Golovko, T. V. (2008). Empirical investigation of intellectual enterprise value and its factors for big Russian companies. Corporate Finance, 2(6), 5-23.
    • Battagello, F. M., Cricelli, L., & Grimaldi, M. (2016). Benchmarking strategic resources and business performance via an open framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(3), 324-350.
    • Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Technology Management, 3(1), 41-60.
    • Cabrita, M., & Bontis, N. (2008). Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 43(1-3), 212-237.
    • Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Menichini, T., Rosati, F., & Sanfelice, G. (2013). Turning corporate social responsibility (CSR)-driven opportunities in competitive advantages: A two-dimensional model. Knowledge and Process Management, 20(1), 50-58.
    • Chen, M. C., Cheng, S. J., Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 159-176.
    • Demartini, P., Paoloni, M., & Paoloni, P. (2015). Sustainability and intangibles: evidence of integrated thinking. Journal of International Business and Economics, 15(2), 107-122.
    • Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge worker productivity: the biggest challenge. California Management Review, 41(2), 79-92.
    • Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value By Finding Its Hidden Brainpower. Harper Collins, New York, NY.
    • Ferioli, C., & Migliarese, P. (1996). Supporting organisational relations through information technology in innovative organisational forms. European Journal of Information Systems, 5(3), 196-207.
    • García-Merino, J. D., García-Zambrano, L., & Rodriguez-Castellanos, A. (2014). Impact of relational capital on business value. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 13(1).
    • Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L., & Rogo, F. (2012). A methodology to assess value creation in communities of innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(3), 305-330.
    • Huang, C., & Wang, M. (2008). The effects of economic value added and intellectual. Capital on the market value of firms: an empirical study. International Journal of Management, 25(4), 722-731.
    • Iazzolino, G., & Migliano, G. (2016). Positioning firms in a new business performance space: an empirical study design on Euronext listed companies. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(4), 106-119.
    • Iazzolino, G., Bruni, M. E., & Beraldi, P. (2013). Using DEA and financial ratings for credit risk evaluation: an empirical analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 20(14), 1310-1317.
    • Joshi, M., Cahill, D., & Sidhu, J. (2013). Intellectual capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 264-285.
    • Kianto, A., Ritala, P., Spender, J.-C., & Vanhala, M. (2014). The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(3), 362-375.
    • Laise, D., Migliarese, P., & Verteramo, S. (2005). Knowledge Organization design: a diagnostic tool. Human systems management, 24(2), 121-131.
    • Maditinos, D., Chatzoudes, D., Tsairidis, C., & Theriou, G. (2011). The impact of intellectual capital on firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 132-151.
    • Mention, A-L., & Bontis, N. (2013). Intellectual capital and performance within the banking sector of Luxembourg and Belgium. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 286-309.
    • Migliarese, P., & Corvello, V. (2010). Organisational relations in organisational design and engineering. Int. J. Organisational Design and Engineering, 1(1/2), 55-68.
    • Petty, R., & Guthrie, J. (2000). Intellectual capital literature review: Measurement, reporting and management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(2), 155-176.
    • Phusavat, K., Comepa, N., Sitko-Lutek, A., & Ooi, K-B. (2011). Interrelationships between intellectual capital and performance empirical examination. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(6), 810-829.
    • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting Customer Competence. Harward Business Review, 78(1), 79-87.
    • Pulic, A. (2000). VAIC – an accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5-8), 702-714.
    • Razafindrambinina, D., & Anggreni, T. (2011). Intellectual capital and corporate financial performance of selected listed companies in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 48(1), 61-77.
    • Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Bantam Dobleday Dell Publishing group, Inc.
    • Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth: Managing & Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA.
    • Tan, H. P., Plowman, D., & Hancock, P. (2007). Intellectual capital and financial returns of companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(1), 76-95.
    • Thurow, L. C. (1999). Building Wealth: The New Rules for Individuals, Companies, and Nation in a Knowledge-Based Economic (1st ed.). HarperCollins, New York, NY.
    • Tseng, C-Y., & James Goo, Y-J. (2005). Intellectual capital and corporate value in an emerging economy: empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturers. R&D Management, 35(2), 187-201.
    • Vishnu, S., & Gupta, V. K. (2014). Intellectual capital and performance of pharmaceutical firms in India. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(1), 83-99.
    • Wang, J-C. (2008). Investigating market value and intellectual capital for S&P 500. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 546-563.
    • Wang, M. (2011). Measuring intellectual capital and its effect on financial performance: evidence from the capital market in Taiwan. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 5(2), 243-265.
    • Wang, Z., Wang, N., & Liang, H. (2014). Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance. Management Decision, 52(2), 230-258.
    • Youndt, M., Subramaniam, M., & Snell, S. (2004). Intellectual capital profiles: an examination of investment and returns. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 335-361.
    • Yu, F., & Zhang, L. (2008). Does Intellectual capital really create value? IEEE Xplore, November, 18.
    • Zambon, S. (2013). Presentation: Accounting and business economics: A conceptual revisitation In Y. Biondi & S. Zambon (Eds). Accounting and Business Economics: Insights from National Traditions (pp. 11-22).
    • Zakery, A., Afrazeh, A., & Dumay, J. (2017). Analysing and improving the strategic alignment of firms’ resource dynamics. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(1), 217-240.
Related Articles

  • Industrial development in Saudi Arabia: disparity in growth and development

    Anis AliORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.03
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020         Issue #2         pp. 23-35 Views: 3109 Downloads: 1049 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Industrial development in any nation plays a vital role in the strengthening of the economy and employs human resources as per specifications and directly towards the mainstream of the nation. In Saudi Arabia, there was rapid industrialization for four decades. Some manufacturing industries performed well, while some internal and external business environment factors influenced the others’ performance. The study focuses on historical development, as well as recent trends of well-performing and poor-performing industries of Saudi Arabia. Small manufacturing industries in Saudi Arabia are underdeveloped and need more attention to attain sustainable and progressive growth rate in the form of the number of establishments to enjoy the potential. Manufacture of tobacco, computer, electronics and optics, pharmaceuticals and transport equipment are the deprived and underdeveloped industries of the manufacturing sector. There should be some easy credit schemes for the development of deprived or underdeveloped manufacturing industries. To attain sustainable growth and development of the manufacturing sector, a positive attitude of the government towards underdeveloped manufacturing industries, favorable labor laws, and entrepreneurial awareness, technical and financial assistance are necessary. The growth and development of the manufacturing sector of Saudi Arabia will be helpful in the attainment of goals of Vision 2030.

  • Why banks should consider ESG risk factors in bank lending?

    Sarwar Uddin AhmedORCID , Samiul Parvez AhmedORCID , Ikramul HasanORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(3).2018.07
    Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018         Issue #3         pp. 71-80 Views: 2876 Downloads: 1154 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Why banks should be concerned about incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in the lending process? What is the motivation? This study aims to find the motives for considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in bank lending process. A primary survey has been conducted to know the current status and motivation for incorporating ESG factors in investment decisions. Sample comprised 30 private commercial banks (PCBs) operating in Bangladesh. Data collected were analyzed with graphs, descriptive statistics, and regression analysis. Findings of the study indicate that banks are mostly considering basic environmental, social and governance factors set by regulators qualitatively. They are lagging behind in considering the advanced ESG criteria needed for sustainable and efficient credit risk management. Based on motivation for incorporating ESG factors, it was found that banks pioneering in incorporating ESG factors in lending decisions are compensated through better financial performance. Findings of the study are expected to encourage practitioners and policy-makers to take more pragmatic steps to incorporate ESG risk factors quantitatively in lending decision-making process.

  • Integrated reporting and financial performance of South African listed banks

    Reon MatemaneORCID , Rozane Wentzel doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(2).2019.11
    Banks and Bank Systems Volume 14, 2019         Issue #2         pp. 128-139 Views: 2809 Downloads: 555 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The recent development of integrated reporting intends to address the limitations associated with corporate reporting practices. This paper aims to examine whether a statistically significant relationship exists between integrated reporting quality and financial performance. Secondary data was used, namely the integrated reports and annual financial statements of South African banks listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) for 2010–2014. For the period 2005–2009, only the financial statements were used, since integrated reporting was not yet mandatory. The research design was longitudinal and it combined qualitative and quantitative methods. Descriptive statistics and Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) were used to explore the relationships between financial performance and integrated reporting quality. The results indicate that there is a positive relationship between integrated reporting quality (IRQ) and earnings per share (EPS). However, there is no significant relationship between IRQ and Tobin’s q (Q-Ratio), IRQ and return on equity (ROE), IRQ and return on assets (ROA) as well as IRQ and economic value added (EVA). Moreover, there are no significant differences on the financial performance of the listed banks before and after the introduction of integrated reporting.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management