Corporate governance and resource management in Nigeria: a paradigm shift

  • Received September 19, 2017;
    Accepted December 14, 2017;
    Published March 14, 2018
  • Author(s)
    Olabode A. Oyewunmi
    ORCID , Adebukola E. Oyewunmi
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.25
  • Article Info
    Volume 16 2018, Issue #1, pp. 259-266
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    2 articles
  • 1149 Views
  • 161 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

The underlying significance of instituting measures for effective corporate governance and rewarding resource management outcomes cannot be relegated. The countries and organizations that deemphasize this practice have mortgaged their potential for long-term growth and corporate sustainability. This paper adopts a critical narrative method to deconstruct the essence of corporate governance and economic resource management ideals. The paper furthers the ongoing conversations on two interrelated business concepts, and provides an apt perspective towards unlocking the essence of corporate governance relative to the Nigeria’s corporate environment. It depicts a corporate paradigm shift that accommodates the dynamics of global best practices taking into account some peculiarities of Nigeria’s corporate climate. The paper also captures relevant theoretical dimensions and pragmatic policy propositions, especially for underperforming socio-economic contexts. In the light of the central theme, specific issues are discussed under the sub-headings of conceptual and theoretical clarifications, corporate governance and resource management in Nigeria, shifting the paradigms, conclusion and recommendations.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business, 45-69.
    • Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross national diversity of corporate governance: Determinants and dimensions. Academy of Management Review.
    • Boscheck, R. (2008). Strategies, markets and governance: Exploring commercial and regulatory agendas. Cambridge University Press, 4.
    • Cornforth, C. (2014). Understanding and combating mission drift in social enterprises. Social Enterprises Journal, 10(1), 3-20.
    • Dickerson, C. M. (2006). Harmonizing business laws in Africa: OHADA calls the tune. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Hein Online, 44, 18-73
    • Fox, M. B. (1998). Required disclosure and corporate governance, in Comparative corporate governance in Klaus J. Hopt et al. (Eds.). The state of the art and emerging research, 701, 716-717.
    • Gill, A. (2008). Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research agenda. Berkley J. Int’L, 452.
    • Heath, J., & Norman, W. (2004). Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management: What can the history of State-run enterprises teach us in the post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 247-265. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
    • Jonathan, D. J. (2010). The “Resource Curse”: Theory and evidence, Real Instituto Eleano, ARI 172/2010, 1-9.
    • Monks, R., & Minow, N. (1995). Corporate governance (Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell). Monopolkommission (1978), Report (Bonn).
    • Nwabughiogu, L. (2017) Osibajo, signs three executive orders on ease of doing business.
    • OECD (1995). OECD Economic Surveys: Germany (Paris: OECD).
    • Oyewunmi, O. A., Adeyemi, K. S., & Ogunnaike, O. O. (2017). Corporate Governance and Human Resource Management in Nigeria’s Downstream Petroleum Sector. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 64(2), 139-153.
    • Oyewunmi, O. A., Osibanjo, A. O., Falola, H. O., & Olujobi, O. J. (2017). Optimization by integration: A corporate governance and human resource management dimension. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(1), 265-272.
    • Sayre-McCord, G. (2000). Kant’s grounding for the metaphysics of morals: A very brief selective summary of sections I and II, UNC/Chapel Hill.
    • Singh, A. (2003). The new international financial architecture, corporate governance and competition in emerging markets: Empirical anomalies and policy issues in Rethinking Development Economics, 377, 391 (Ha-Joon Chang ed.).
    • Soremekun, K. (2013). Nigeria, oil and the Yamani syndrome. Covenant University Public Lecture Series, 2(2).
    • Steiner, G., Stark, W., Pliz, H., & Hutterer, H. (2000). Analysis of the fundamental concepts of resource management. GUA-Gescllschaft fur unfastened Analysea GMB Secshauser Strasse 83a-1150 Wien, Austria.
    • Tahvonen, O. (2000). Personal statement to the authors. Analyses of the fundamental concepts of resource management.
    • Trading Economics.
    • Transparency International.
    • Tricker, R. I. (1994). The board’s role in strategy formulation: Some cross-cultural comparisons. Futures, 26(4), 403-15.
Related Articles

  • Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?

    Patrick VelteORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.02
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017         Issue #2         pp. 19-35 Views: 4519 Downloads: 1725 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.

  • Corporate governance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of selected multinational firms in Nigeria

    Gideon Tayo Akinleye , Odunayo OlarewajuORCID Researcher ID, Bamikole Samson Fajuyagbe doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.02
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #1         pp. 11-18 Views: 3463 Downloads: 576 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This study focused on corporate governance and performance of selected Nigerian multinational firms from 2012 to 2016. Specifically, the study focused on the effect of board size, activism and committee activism on return on asset and firm growth rate. Secondary data collected from four multinational firms were analyzed via static panel estimation techniques. While board size and board activism exerted significant negative impact on return on asset, committee activism exerted insignificant impact. The results of the study further showed that board size and board activism exert insignificant negative impact on firm’s growth rate, while committee activism insignificantly spurs firm’s growth rate. Decisively, discoveries from this study reflect that corporate governance has significant negative impact on return on asset, but has insignificant influence on the growth rate of Nigerian multinational firms. Based on these findings, the authors recommended that corporate governance dynamics in firms world over should be reconsidered, such that it gives credence to more than just numbers of persons or meetings held, but the main reasons and deliberations in such meetings. It was also recommended that excessive increase in magnitude or frequency of meetings held by board of directors cum committee should be avoided.

  • Impact of corporate governance mechanisms on financial reporting quality: a study of Indian GAAP and Indian Accounting Standards

    Faozi A. AlmaqtariORCID Researcher ID, Abdulwahid Abdullah HashedORCID , Mohd ShamimORCID , Waleed M. Al-ahdal doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.01
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020         Issue #4         pp. 1-13 Views: 3044 Downloads: 623 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The present study examines the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on financial reporting quality under Indian GAAP and Indian Accounting Standards (Ind. AS). A sample of 97 companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange is selected. Corporate governance mechanisms have been considered as independent variables, and financial reporting quality is the dependent variable. Corporate governance is measured by board effectiveness (board size, independence, diligence, and expertise), audit committee attributes (size, independence, diligence, and expertise), foreign ownership, and audit quality. Descriptive statistics, correlation, and OLS regression are conducted to estimate the results. The study results reveal that board characteristics and audit committee attributes, except for audit committee diligence, have a significant effect on financial reporting quality. However, the impact of board diligence and audit committee attributes is negative. Foreign ownership has no contribution to financial reporting quality, but audit quality has a significant effect. The findings of the study have considerable implications for regulators, policymakers, managers, investors, analysts, and academicians. More emphasis should be given to compliance with Ind. AS, and an oversight body for compliance with Ind. AS should be established.

    Acknowledgment
    This publication was supported by Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management