Reconceptualizing and modeling sustainable consumption behavior: A synthesis of qualitative evidence from online education industry
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.12
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2021, Issue #3, pp. 144-156
- Cited by
- 864 Views
-
260 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In recent years, the concept of sustainable consumption behavior (SCB) is largely introduced and changed continuously to be discussed with industries such as energy sector, agriculture, transportation, sharing economy, and tourism. However, the study of sustainable consumption behavior in the online education industry (SCBOEI) remains a research gap. Thus, this paper aims to identify the significance of sustainable consumption behavior and theoretically conceptualize SCBOEI. This study employs content and text analysis to reconceptualize the major theories that contribute to the research of SCB. The findings in this study show that SCBOEI is contributed of great significance to promote sustainable development. In addition, this study introduces a model of SCBOEI, in which the consumer value theory, social exchange theory, and planned behavior theory are integrated. Additionally, this paper suggests that value, environmental attitude, identity, consumer engagement, and contextual factors (government behavior, market conditions, and environmental education) are highly important to extend the research on SCBOEI. In conclusion, this study strongly recommends that SCB research shall be directed to the online education industry. Furthermore, future studies shall emphasize the empirical effects of psychological factors, activity factors, and contextual factors for SCBOEI to find the correlation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M30, M31
-
References90
-
Tables2
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptualized SCBOEI framework
-
- Table 1. Theoretical basis of sustainable consumption behavior in 2010–2020
- Table 2. Sustainable consumption behavior in different perspectives
-
- Agha, S., Mekkawy, W., Ibanez-Escriche, N., Lind, C., Kumar, J., Mandal, A., Benzie, J.A.H., & Doeschl-Wilson, A. (2018). Breeding for robustness: investigating the genotype-by-environment interaction and micro-environmental sensitivity of Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animal genetics, 49(5), 421-427.
- Alam, S. S., Ahmad, M., Ho, Y.-H., Omar, N. A., & Lin, C.-Y. (2020). Applying an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Sustainable Food Consumption. Sustainability, 12(20), 8394.
- Antonsich, M. (2010). Meanings of place and aspects of the self: an interdisciplinary and empirical account. GeoJournal, 75(1), 119-132.
- Aygün, B., Şakar, E., Korkut, T., Sayyed, M. I., & Karabulut, A. (2019). New high temperature resistant heavy concretes for fast neutron and gamma radiation shielding. Radiochimica Acta, 107(4), 359-367.
- Azjen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
- Baharumshah, A. Z., Soon, S.-V., & Lau, E. (2017). Fiscal sustainability in an emerging market economy: When does public debt turn bad? Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(1), 99-113.
- Basil, D. Z., Basil, M., Lavack, A. M., & Deshpande, S. (2020). Toward developing an environmental efficacy construct. Journal of Social Marketing, 10(1), 1-17.
- Bernardes, J. P., Ferreira, F., Marques, A. D., & Nogueira, M. (2018). “Do as I say, not as I do”-a systematic literature review on the attitude-behaviour gap towards sustainable consumption of Generation Y. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 459, 012089.
- Čapienė, A. (2019). Theories, models and trends of sustainable consumption attitude-behaviour gap. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 41(3), 332-341.
- Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (2017). Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 745-767.
- Chatterjee, A., Gerdes, M., Prinz, A., & Martinez, S. (2021). Human Coaching Methodologies for Automatic Electronic Coaching (eCoaching) as Behavioral Interventions With Information and Communication Technology: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e23533.
- Cheng, H., Chen, C., Wu, S., Mirza, Z. A., & Liu, Z. (2017). Emergy evaluation of cropping, poultry rearing, and fish raising systems in the drawdown zone of Three Gorges Reservoir of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 559-571.
- Clayton, S., Prévot, A. C., Germain, L., & Saint-Jalme, M. (2017). Public support for biodiversity after a zoo visit: Environmental concern, conservation knowledge, and self-efficacy. Curator: The Museum Journal, 60(1), 87-100.
- Cohen, M. J. (2005). Sustainable consumption American style: nutrition education, active living and financial literacy. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 12(4), 407-418.
- Concari, A., Kok, G., & Martens, P. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach. Sustainability, 12(11), 4452.
- Confente, I., Scarpi, D., & Russo, I. (2020). Marketing a new generation of bio-plastics products for a circular economy: The role of green self-identity, self-congruity, and perceived value. Journal of Business Research, 112, 431-439.
- Connell, K. Y. H., & Kozar, J. M. (2014). Environmentally sustainable clothing consumption: knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. In Roadmap to sustainable textiles and clothing (pp. 41-61). Springer.
- Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1987). Social exchange theory. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
- Cruz, S. M., & Manata, B. (2020). Measurement of environmental concern: A review and analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 363.
- Cuevas, S., Downs, S. M., Ghosh-Jerath, S., Aafrin, & Shankar, B. (2019). Analysing the policy space for the promotion of healthy, sustainable edible oil consumption in India. Public health nutrition, 22(18), 3435-3446.
- Dermody, J., Koenig-Lewis, N., Zhao, A. L., & Hanmer-Lloyd, S. (2021). Critiquing a Utopian idea of Sustainable Consumption: A Post-Capitalism Perspective. Journal of Macromarketing.
- Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 335-372.
- Dominici, G., & Palumbo, F. (2013). How to build an e-learning product: Factors for student/customer satisfaction. Business Horizons, 56(1), 87-96.
- Dong, X., Li, H., Liu, S., Cai, C., & Fan, X. (2018). How does material possession love influence sustainable consumption behavior towards the durable products? Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 389-400.
- Duroy, Q. (2011). The path to a sustainable economy: sustainable consumption, social identity and ecological citizenship. International Journal of Green Economics, 5(1), 1-14.
- Elhoushy, S., & Lanzini, P. (2021). Factors affecting sustainable consumer behavior in the MENA region: A systematic review. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 256-279.
- Fesenfeld, L. P., Sun, Y., Wicki, M., & Bernauer, T. (2021). The role and limits of strategic framing for promoting sustainable consumption and policy. Global Environmental Change, 68, 102266.
- Foroudi, M. M., Balmer, J. M., Chen, W., Foroudi, P., & Patsala, P. (2020). Explicating place identity attitudes, place architecture attitudes, and identification triad theory. Journal of Business Research, 109, 321-336.
- Gatautis, R., Banytė, J., & Vitkauskaitė, E. (2021). Gamification and Consumer Engagement. Springer.
- Gong, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Cheng, M., Wang, F., & Yu, N. (2020). Internet use encourages pro-environmental behavior: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120725.
- Guan, J., & Li, Q. (2014). The current situation, trend and experience of online education in China. China’s E-education (8), 62-66.
- Hadjichambis, A. C., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Ioannou, H., Georgiou, Y., & Manoli, C. C. (2015). Integrating sustainable consumption into environmental education: A case study on environmental representations, decision making and intention to act. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(1), 67-86.
- Haupt, M., & Hellweg, S. (2019). Measuring the environmental sustainability of a circular economy. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 1-2, 100005.
- Hoa, N. T., Tuan, T. T., Tung, T., & Huan, P. Q. (2021). Factors affecting online purchase behaviour in vietnam. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(4), 1-11.
- Hogg, M. A. (2020). Social identity theory. Stanford University Press.
- Hsiao, P.-W., & Su, C.-H. (2021). A Study on the Impact of STEAM Education for Sustainable Development Courses and Its Effects on Student Motivation and Learning. Sustainability, 13(7), 3772.
- Huyard, C. (2020). Sustainable food education: what food preparation competences are needed to support vegetable consumption? Environmental Education Research, 26(8), 1164-1176.
- Javornik, A., & Mandelli, A. (2013). Research categories in studying customer engagement. AM2013 Academy of Marketing Conference.
- Jugert, P., Greenaway, K. H., Barth, M., Büchner, R., Eisentraut, S., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 12-23.
- King, L. O. (2016). Functional sustainability indicators. Ecological indicators, 66, 121-131.
- Kostadinova, E. (2016). Sustainable consumer behavior: Literature overview. Economic Alternatives, 2, 224-234.
- Lai, W.-H. (2011). Willingness-to-engage in technology transfer in industry–university collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1218-1223.
- Lee, C. K., Levy, D. S., & Yap, C. S. F. (2015). How does the theory of consumption values contribute to place identity and sustainable consumption? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(6), 597-607.
- Leow, L. P., Phua, L. K., & Teh, S. Y. (2021). Extending the social influence factor: behavioural intention to increase the usage of information and communication technology-enhanced student-centered teaching methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1853-1879.
- Lin, P.-C., & Huang, Y.-H. (2012). The influence factors on choice behavior regarding green products based on the theory of consumption values. Journal of Cleaner Production, 22(1), 11-18.
- Lin, S. T., & Niu, H. J. (2018). Green consumption: Environmental knowledge, environmental consciousness, social norms, and purchasing behavior. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1679-1688.
- Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2020). A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: the effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 464-481.
- Luchs, M. G., & Mooradian, T. A. (2012). Sex, personality, and sustainable consumer behaviour: Elucidating the gender effect. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1), 127-144.
- Mannacharaju, M., Villalan, A. K., Shenbagam, B., Karmegam, P. M., Natarajan, P., Somasundaram, S., Arumugam, G., & Ganesan, S. (2020). Towards sustainable system configuration for the treatment of fish processing wastewater using bioreactors. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(1), 353-365.
- Martin, D. M., & Väistö, T. (2016). Reducing the attitude-behavior gap in sustainable consumption: A theoretical proposition and the American electric vehicle market. In Marketing in and for a Sustainable Society (pp. 193-213). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Marzouk, O. A., & Mahrous, A. A. (2020). Sustainable consumption behavior of energy and water-efficient products in a resource-constrained environment. Journal of Global Marketing, 33(5), 335-353.
- Mehta, S., Saxena, T., & Purohit, N. (2020). The new consumer behaviour paradigm amid COVID-19: Permanent or transient? Journal of Health Management, 22(2), 291-301.
- Moragrega, I., & Ríos, J. L. (2021). Medicinal plants in the treatment of depression: Evidence from preclinical studies. Planta medica, 87(9), 656-685.
- Nguyen, A. T., Parker, L., Brennan, L., & Lockrey, S. (2020). A consumer definition of eco-friendly packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119792.
- Nigbur, D., Lyons, E., & Uzzell, D. (2010). Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 259-284.
- Özhan, Ş. Ç., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). The effects of flow, emotional engagement, and motivation on success in a gamified online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 2006-2031.
- Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M. (2020). Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: Comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117, 623-628.
- Piligrimienė, Ž., Žukauskaitė, A., Korzilius, H., Banytė, J., & Dovalienė, A. (2020). Internal and external determinants of consumer engagement in sustainable consumption. Sustainability, 12(4), 1349.
- Pimdee, P. (2020). Antecedents of Thai student teacher sustainable consumption behavior. Heliyon, 6(8), e04676.
- Pu, R., & Pathranarakul, P. (2019). Sharing Economy as Innovative Paradigm Towards Sustainable Development: A Conceptual Review. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8, 387-398.
- Pu, R., Teresiene, D., Pieczulis, I., Kong, J., & Yue, X.-G. (2021). The Interaction between Banking Sector and Financial Technology Companies: Qualitative Assessment – A Case of Lithuania. Risks, 9(1), 21.
- Qizhia, Y., & Xiang, Y. (2012). The Research on the Contribution of Rural Tourism to Peasants’ Income – Based on the empirical analysis of Chengdu. On Economic Problems, 9.
- Rasul, G., Neupane, N., Hussain, A., & Pasakhala, B. (2021). Beyond hydropower: towards an integrated solution for water, energy and food security in South Asia. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 37(3), 466-490.
- Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus (covid-19) and social value co-creation. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.
- Razzaque, A. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and IT Governance: A Literature Review. In A.M.A. Musleh Al-Sartawi (Ed.), The Big Data-Driven Digital Economy: Artificial and Computational Intelligence (pp. 85-97). Cham: Springer.
- Sealza, I. S., & Sealza, L. P. (2014). Recovering from the effects of natural disaster: the case of urban Cagayan de Oro, Philippines. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(3), 103.
- Severo, E. A., de Guimarães, J. C. F., Brito, L. M. P., & Dellarmelin, M. L. (2017). Environmental sustainability and sustainable consumption: the perception of baby boomers, generation X and Y in Brazil. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 11(3).
- Shaban, Y., & El-Bassiouny, N. (2015). Sustainable consumption in Egypt: insights and implications. 21st Annual Research Conference of the American University in Cairo (AUC). Cairo.
- Shan, S., Peng, J., & Wei, Y. (2021). Environmental Sustainability assessment 2.0: The value of social media data for determining the emotional responses of people to river pollution – A case study of Weibo (Chinese Twitter). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 75, 100868.
- Sharma, R., & Jha, M. (2017). Values influencing sustainable consumption behaviour: Exploring the contextual relationship. Journal of Business Research, 76, 77-88.
- Sigala, M. (2014). Customer involvement in sustainable supply chain management: A research framework and implications in tourism. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 76-88.
- Spangenberg, J. H., & Lorek, S. (2019). Sufficiency and consumer behaviour: From theory to policy. Energy Policy, 129, 1070-1079.
- Stern, P. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
- Sun, B., & Yang, X. (2019). Simulation of water resources carrying capacity in Xiong’an New Area based on system dynamics model. Water, 11(5), 1085.
- Sun, X., & Guo, Y. (2018). The Ways of Educational Targeted Poverty Alleviation for the Poor in Rural Areas in Chongqing. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(6).
- Tajfel, H. (1979). Individuals and groups in social psychology. British Journal of social and clinical psychology, 18(2), 183-190.
- Taufique, K. M. R., Vocino, A., & Polonsky, M. J. (2017). The influence of eco-label knowledge and trust on pro-environmental consumer behaviour in an emerging market. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(7), 511-529.
- Tian, Q., Sato, M., Nakahara, H., Lee, S.-Y., Kang, J.H., & Didham, R. J. (rev.ed.). (2011). The Role of Governments in Education for Sustainable Consumption: Strengthening Capacity For Effective Implementation In China, Japan, And Republic Of Korea (ISG Policy Report No. 2011-03). Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
- Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98-110.
- Vinz, D. (2009). Gender and sustainable consumption: A German environmental perspective. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 16(2), 159-179.
- Wang, P., Liu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2014). Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: a survey of the rural residents in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 152-165.
- Wang, Y. (2017). Promoting sustainable consumption behaviors: The impacts of environmental attitudes and governance in a cross-national context. Environment and Behavior, 49(10), 1128-1155.
- Wang, Y., Xiang, D., Yang, Z., & Ma, S. S. (2019). Unraveling customer sustainable consumption behaviors in sharing economy: A socio-economic approach based on social exchange theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 869-879.
- Wołek, M., Wolański, M., Bartłomiejczyk, M., Wyszomirski, O., Grzelec, K., & Hebel, K. (2021). Ensuring sustainable development of urban public transport: A case study of the trolleybus system in Gdynia and Sopot (Poland). Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123807.
- Wu, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021). On innovation capitalization: Empirical evidence from Guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 109, 102323.
- Xia, T., & Pei, J. (2021). The Impact of Digital Economy on Employment – Thinking Based on the Epidemic Situation in 2020. E3S Web of Conferences.
- Yamoah, F. A., & Acquaye, A. (2019). Unravelling the attitude-behaviour gap paradox for sustainable food consumption: Insight from the UK apple market. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 172-184.
- Yang, S., Li, L., & Zhang, J. (2018). Understanding consumers’ sustainable consumption intention at china’s double-11 online shopping festival: An extended theory of planned behavior model. Sustainability, 10(6), 1801.
- Zhang, H., & Li, M. (2020). China’s water diplomacy in the Mekong: a paradigm shift and the role of Yunnan provincial government. Water International, 45(4), 347-364.
- Zhang, W., Yu, Y., Zhou, X., Yang, S., & Li, C. (2018). Evaluating water consumption based on water hierarchy structure for sustainable development using grey relational analysis: case study in Chongqing, China. Sustainability, 10(5), 1538.