Post 2015 strategies to improve business models in corporate Turkey
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.14(3).2018.01
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2018, Issue #3, pp. 1-7
- 950 Views
-
88 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The 2015 elections in Turkey disrupted corporate business models in the country. Conducting business in Turkey has unquestionably been impacted by political activity that has often erupted into cultural wars and civil demonstrations. This paper discusses the strategies corporations must undertake to secure a sustainable competitive advantage in Turkey. It researches and critically evaluates the business impact of the changing and often turbulent politics, as well as collects and analyzes economic data in order to propose a decision making platform allowing companies to make informed strategic decisions. Paralleling this research, the paper also investigates how supply chains into and out of Turkey have been severely disrupted as a result of political unrest. Supply chain disruption is increasing amongst trading nations as they (the supply chains) become more complex as a result of their global expansion. External, as well as internal data, are gathered and examined for this paper in order to recommend corporate action to be taken to minimize supply chain disruption. Protection of supply chains needs to also be a priority of government. Therefore, this paper suggests how involvement in supply chain management by a stable government in Turkey would help minimize disruption and make supply chains in the country much more productive and efficient.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F23, M31, O50
-
References18
-
Tables0
-
Figures1
-
- Fig. 1. Real Sector Confidence Index (RSCI)
-
- Akkoc, R. (2015). How Turkey’s Economy went from Flying to Flagging – and could get Worse. The Telegraph.
- Atabek, A., Andrews, D., & Gönenç, R. (2017). Rebalancing Turkey’s Growth by Improving Resource Allocation and Productivity (OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1367). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- BBVA research (2018). Strong Growth set to Moderate but with Balanced Risks. Turkstat & Garanti MPM Model, Turkey Economic Outlook.
- BDVA Research (2018).
- Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (2018).
- Culp, S. (2013). Supply Chain Disruption a Major Threat to Business. Forbes.
- Daily Sabah Business (2016). Turkish Business to Expand in Asia–Pacific.
- Ersoy, E., & Kandemir (2017). Turkey Firms Ready $64 Billion Spending Spree to Leave Home.
- Frayer, L. (2017). Turkish Businesses Snagged in Government’s Post – Coup Crackdown.
- Imamoglue, Z. (2016). Turkey is Performing Well Below its Potential.
- Oguz, M. (2015). Technology is the Path to Turkey’s Future.
- Pitel, L., & Cakir, O. (2018). Erdogan Jobs Vow adds to Business Uncertainty.Financial Times.
- Progressive Media (2012). CEVA opens new Control Tower in Turkey for Supply Chain Efficiency.
- SCM Supply Chain Movement (2015). Unilever’s Supply Chain in Turkey.
- Skinner, A. (2016). Turkish Business Suffers under Erdogan’s Post-coup Gullen Purge.
- The Daily Pak Banker (2014). Turkey’s Netlog Logistics to Expand with EBRD Loan. Plus Media Solutions (PMS).
- Vargo & Lusch (2015). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
- Ziemann, V., & Guérard, B. (2016). Reaping the Benefits of Global Chains in Turkey (OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1366). Paris: OECD Publishing.