Ownership composition and intellectual capital disclosure: Indonesia as a case study
-
Author(s)Yana UlfahLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1277-652X
,
Rizky YudaruddinLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0850-9747
,
Yanzil Azizil YudaruddinLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9209-0677
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(2).2021.04
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2021, Issue #2, pp. 37-47
- Cited by
- 1054 Views
-
535 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study explores whether ownership structure (comprising ownership concentration, foreign, managerial, and institutional ownership) affects intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) in Southeast Asia’s largest stock market and Indonesia’s emerging economy. The sample includes 323 public firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from seven industries between 2008 and 2017, or 2,634 firm-year observations. Data were analyzed using the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression with robust standard errors. The results show that ICD is positively related to ownership concentration. A negative and substantial relationship was found for both foreign and managerial ownerships, while the institutional ownership variable had a negative and insignificant impact. Overall, the results show robust conclusions regarding the impact of the ownership structure on ICD. The findings of this investigation could be taken into account by capital market authorities such as the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) to raise awareness of intellectual capital and improve ICD practices.
Acknowledgment
The researchers are grateful for the valuable responses from two unnamed reviewers and discussion respondents at Mulawarman University. We also thank the Indonesia Stock Exchanges (IDX) and The Indonesia Capital Market Institute for providing the annual report.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E44, M13, O34
-
References34
-
Tables7
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Sample firms by industry
- Table 2. Intellectual capital disclosure checklist
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Correlation matrix
- Table 5. Impact of ownership structure on intellectual capital disclosure
- Table 6. Impact of ownership structure on intellectual capital disclosure: high vs low
- Table 7. Impact of ownership structure on different categories of intellectual capital disclosure
-
- Abeysekera, I. (2010). The Influence of Board Size on Intellectual Capital Disclosure by Kenyan Listed Firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(4), 504-518.
- Al-Akra, M., Eddie, I. A., & Ali, M. J. (2010). The Influence of The Introduction of Accounting Disclosure Regulation on Mandatory disclosure Compliance: Evidence from Jordan. The British Accounting Review, 42(3), 170-186.
- Alfraih, M. M. (2018). The role of corporate governance in intellectual capital disclosure. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(1), 101-121.
- Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors Influencing Voluntary Corporate Disclosure By Kenyan Companies. Corporate Governance an International Review, 14(2), 107-125.
- Barros, Carlos P. Boubaker, Sabri, & Hamrouni. (2013). Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure in France. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(2), 561-577.
- Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., & Guedhami, O. (2005). Liberalization, corporate governance and the performance of privatized firms in developing countries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(5), 767-790.
- Brown, J. David., Earle, John S., & Telegdy, Almos. (2004). Does Privatization Raise Productivity? Evidence from Comprehensive Panel Data on Manufacturing Firms in Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine (November 2004) (W.E. Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper No. 04-107).
- Brüggen, A., Vergauwen, P., & Dao, M. (2009). Determinants of Intellectual Capital Disclosure: Evidence From Australia. Management Decision, 47(2), 233-245.
- Cerbioni, F., & Parbonetti, A. (2007). Exploring the Effects of Corporate Governance on Intellectual Capital Disclosure: An Analysis of European Biotechnology Companies. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 791-826.
- Cheng, E. C. M., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board Composition, Regulatory Regime and Voluntary Disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 262-289.
- Craswell, A., & Taylor, S. (1992). Discretionary Disclosure of Reserves by Oil and Gas Companies: An Economic Analysis. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 19(2), 295-308.
- Eng, L. L., & Mak, Y. T. (2003). Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325-345.
- Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
- Ferreira, A. L., Branco, M. C., & Moreira, J. A. (2012). Factors Influencing Intellectual Capital Disclosure by Portuguese Companies. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2), 278.
- García-Meca, E., & Sánchez-Ballesta, J. P. (2010). The Association of Board Independence and Ownership Concentration with Voluntary Disclosure: A Meta-Analysis. European Accounting Review, 19(32), 603-627.
- Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corporations. ABACUS, 38(3), 317-349.
- Hidalgo, R. L., Garcia-Meca, E., & Martinez, I. (2011). Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital Disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 483-495.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Kennedy P (2008). A Guide to Econometrics. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
- Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 207-223.
- Lakhal, F. (2005). Voluntary Earnings Disclosures and Corporate Governance: Evidence from France. Review of Accounting and Finance, 4(3), 64-85.
- Li, J., Pike, R., & Haniffa, R. (2008). Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Corporate Governance Structure in UK Firms. Accounting and Business Research, 38(2), 37-41.
- Mangena, M., & Pike, R. (2005). The Effect of Audit Committee Shareholding, Financial Expertise and Size on Interim Financial Disclosures. Accounting and Business Research, 35(4), 327-349.
- Martins, M. M., Morais, A. I., Isidro, H., & Laureano, R. (2016). Intellectual Capital Disclosure: The Portuguese Case. Journal of The Knowledge Economy, 9(4l), 1224-1245.
- Mckinnon, J. L., & Dalimunthe, L. (1993). Voluntary Disclosure of Segment Information by Australian Divesified Companies. Accounting and Finance, 33(1), 33-50.
- Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A., & Belal, A. R. (2015). Intellectual Capital Disclosures and Corporate Governance: An Empirical Examination. Advances in Accounting, 31(2), 219-227.
- Nadeem, M. (2020). Does board gender diversity influence voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital in initial public offering prospectuses? Evidence from China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(2), 100-118.
- Naser, K., Al-Khatib, K., & Karbhari, Y. (2002). Empirical evidence on the depth of corporate information disclosure in developing countries. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 12(3/4), 122-155.
- Oliveira, L., Lima Rodrigues, L., & Craig, R. (2006). Firm-specific Determinants of Intangibles Reporting: Evidence from the Portuguese Stock Market. Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 10(1), 11-33.
- Prencipe, A. (2004). Proprietary Costs and Determinants of Voluntary Segment Disclosure: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies. European Accounting Review, 13(2), 319-340.
- Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1986). Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 458-461.
- Tejedo-Romero, F., Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2017). Women directors and disclosure of intellectual capital information. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(3), 123-131.
- Vergauwen, P. G. M. C., & Van Alem, F. J. C. (2005). Annual Report IC Disclosures in The Netherlands, France And Germany. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(1), 89-104.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (5th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason.
-
Perceived health risk, online retail ethics, and consumer behavior within online shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic
Yuniarti Fihartini ,
Arief Helmi ,
Meydia Hassan ,
Yevis Marty Oesman
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.02
Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021 Issue #3 pp. 17-29 Views: 4454 Downloads: 1707 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe risk of virus contracting during the COVID-19 pandemic has changed consumer preference for online shopping to meet their daily needs than shopping in brick-and-mortar stores. Online shopping presents a different environment, atmosphere, and experience. The possibility of ethical violations is higher during online than face-to-face transactions. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the influence of perceived health risk and customer perception of online retail ethics on consumer online shopping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, involving seven variables, namely perceived health risk, security, privacy, non-deception, reliability fulfillment, service recovery, and online shopping behavior. The data were collected through an online survey by employing the purposive sampling technique to a consumer who has shopped online during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. 315 valid responses were obtained and analyzed through quantitative method using SEM-Amos. The results showed that perceived health risk and four variables of online retail ethics including security, privacy, reliability fulfillment, and service recovery affected online shopping behavior. Meanwhile, non-deception was found to have an insignificant effect. The coefficient value proved perceived health risk to be more dominant in influencing online shopping behavior than the variables of online retail ethics. Thus, consumers pay more concern for their health during online shopping. However, positive consumer perceptions of the behavior of online retail websites in providing services also can encourage consumers to shop online during this pandemic.
-
Human resource management in promoting innovation and organizational performance
I Gede Riana ,
Gede Suparna ,
I Gusti Made Suwandana ,
Sebastian Kot 
,
Ismi Rajiani
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.10
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #1 pp. 107-118 Views: 3496 Downloads: 826 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯHuman resource management (HRM) is one of the elements enabling an organization to remain competitive in turbulence conditions. The effective practice of HRM makes competent and innovative employees contributing to the achievement of organizational objectives. This study aims to analyze HRM practices in creating innovation and organizational performance. The questionnaire was used to measure the respondents’ perceptions of variables used by a Likert scale. A survey of 126 manager samples and middle managers at export-oriented short and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Bali, Indonesia, was conducted to test the model. The analysis has shown that the proposed model was proven to be compliant with the research hypotheses. HRM significantly affects organizational performance and innovation, and it was found out that innovation can improve organizational performance. However, in the process of simultaneous testing, it was found out that innovation cannot improve organizational performance. The lack of attention to investments in human resources became one of the barriers to SMEs in creating innovation.
-
Positive contribution of the good corporate governance rating to stability and performance: evidence from Indonesia
RR. Iramani , Muazaroh Muazaroh , Abdul Mongid
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.01
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 1-11 Views: 3157 Downloads: 309 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper aims to examine the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) practice on bank stability and performance. Governance is measured using the GCG rating that covers eleven aspects. The authors apply instrumental regression to link governance to performance and stability. The study covers a sample of 150 banks. The result shows that bank stability can mediate bank governance and bank performance. On the determinant of bank performance, it can be concluded that the GCG rating is positive and directly influences bank performance. Bank stability is also positive for bank performance indicating the indirect contribution of the GCG rating to bank performance. NPL, LDR, CAR and bank’s size (LASSET) are all negative and significant. The aim of this paper is to provide strong empirical evidence on the importance of governance and stability for performance. The limitations of this paper are the size of the sample and that it only covers public banks which are theoretically required to apply better governance in all aspects of their business by the Capital Market Authority.
