Impact of corporate governance mechanisms on financial reporting quality: a study of Indian GAAP and Indian Accounting Standards
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.01
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #4, pp. 1-13
- Cited by
- 2921 Views
-
607 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The present study examines the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on financial reporting quality under Indian GAAP and Indian Accounting Standards (Ind. AS). A sample of 97 companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange is selected. Corporate governance mechanisms have been considered as independent variables, and financial reporting quality is the dependent variable. Corporate governance is measured by board effectiveness (board size, independence, diligence, and expertise), audit committee attributes (size, independence, diligence, and expertise), foreign ownership, and audit quality. Descriptive statistics, correlation, and OLS regression are conducted to estimate the results. The study results reveal that board characteristics and audit committee attributes, except for audit committee diligence, have a significant effect on financial reporting quality. However, the impact of board diligence and audit committee attributes is negative. Foreign ownership has no contribution to financial reporting quality, but audit quality has a significant effect. The findings of the study have considerable implications for regulators, policymakers, managers, investors, analysts, and academicians. More emphasis should be given to compliance with Ind. AS, and an oversight body for compliance with Ind. AS should be established.
Acknowledgment
This publication was supported by Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, M40, M41
-
References53
-
Tables4
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research model
- Figure 2. Descriptive statistics for CG attributes
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of CG attributes
- Table 2. OLS regression analysis
- Table 3. Accounting standards wise OLS regression analysis
- Table A1. Operational definition of variables
-
- Abbott, L. J., Park, Y., & Parker, S. (2000). The effects of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance, 26(11), 55-68.
- Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M., & Matos, P. (2011). Does governance travel around the world? Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), 154-181.
- Agrawal, A., & Chadha, S. (2005). Corporate governance and accounting scandals. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 371-406.
- Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2006). Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2-3), 411-437.
- Ahmed, K., Hossain, M., & Adams, M. (2006). The effects of board composition and board size on the informativeness of annual accounting earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 418-431.
- Aljaaidi, K. S. Y. (2013). Corporate governance and auditor choice among companies in GCC Countries (Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Utara Malaysia.
- Al-Janadi, Y., Rahman, R. A., & Alazzani, A. (2016). Does government ownership affect corporate governance and corporate disclosure? Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(8/9), 871-890.
- Almaqtari, F. A., Al-Hattami, H. M., Al-Nuzaili, K. M., & Al-Bukhrani, M. A. (2020). Corporate governance in India: A systematic review and synthesis for future research. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1803579.
- Almaqtari, F. A., Farhan, N. H., Al-Homaidi, E. A., & Mishra, N. (2020). An empirical evaluation of financial reporting quality of the Indian GAAP and Indian accounting standards. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation. (In Press).
- Almaqtari, F. A., Shamim, M., Al-Hattami, H. M., & Aqlan, S. A. (2020). Corporate governance in India and some selected Gulf countries. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 12(2), 165-185.
- Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Fadzil, F. H. (2014). The effect on the relationship between board of directors characteristics on firm performance in Oman: Empirical Study. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(3), 556-574.
- Arouri, H., Hossain, M., & Muttakin, B. (2014). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate performance Evidence from GCC countries. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 4(1), 117-130.
- Bagaeva, A. (2008). An examination of the effect of international investors on accounting information quality in Russia. Advances in Accounting, 24(2), 157-161.
- Beasley, M. (1996). An empirical analysis of the rotation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443-465.
- Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). The Audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 65-122.
- Becker, C., DeFond, M., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24.
- Bedard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courtteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(2), 13-35.
- Bozec, Y., & Bozec, R. (2007). Ownership concentration and corporate governance practices: substitution or expropriation effects? Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24(3), 182-195.
- Brown, J., Falaschetti, D., & Orlando, M. (2010). Auditor independence and earnings quality: Evidence for market discipline vs. Sarbanes-Oxley proscriptions. American Law and Economics Review, 12(1), 39-68.
- Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going- concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78(1), 95-117.
- Chalaki, P., Didar, H., & Riahinezhad, M. (2012). Corporate governance attributes and financial reporting quality: Empirical evidence from Iran. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(15), 223-229.
- Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D., & Rui, O. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 424-448.
- Cho, S., & Rui, O. M. (2009). Exploring the effects of China’s two-tier board system and ownership structure on firm performance and earnings informativeness. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 16(1), 95-117.
- Choi, J. H., Jeon, K. A., & Park, J. I. (2004). The role of audit committees in decreasing earnings management: Korean evidence. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 1(1), 37-60.
- Chou, H. I., Li, H., & Yin, X. (2010). The effects of financial distress and capital structure on the work effort of outside directors. Journal of Empirical Finance, 17(3), 300-312.
- Cohen, J., Hoitash, U., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2013). The effect of audit committee industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting process. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 243-273.
- Davidson, R., Goodwin-Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2005). Internal governance structures and earnings management. Accounting & Finance, 45(2), 241-267.
- DeFond, M., Hann, R., & Hu, X. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), 153-193.
- Deloitte. (2017). Roadmap drawn up for IFRS convergence of Indian banks and insurers.
- Ditropoulos, P., & Asteriou, D. (2010). The effect of board composition on the informativeness and quality of annual earnings: Empirical evidence from Greece. Research in International Business and Finance, 24(2), 190-205.
- Dong, M., & Xue, Q. (2010). The effect of governance transparency on earnings response coefficient: Evidence from emerging markets. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 6(2/3), 158-190.
- Felo, A. J., Krishnamurthy, S., & Solieri, S. A. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and the perceived quality of financial reporting: an empirical analysis (Working Paper). Pennsylvania State University.
- Firth, M., Fung, P. M., & Rui, O. M. (2007). How ownership and corporate governance influence chief executive pay in China’s listed firms. Journal of Business Research, 60(7), 776-785.
- García-Meca, E., & Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2018). Does managerial ability influence the quality of financial reporting? European Management Journal, 36(4), 544-557.
- Habbash, M., & Alghamdi, S. (2015). The perception of earnings management motivations in Saudi public firms. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 5(1), 122-147.
- Hundal, S. (2013). Independence, expertise and experience of audit committees: Some aspects of Indian corporate sector. American International Journal of Social Science, 2(5), 58-75.
- Kamarudin, K. A., Ismail, W. A. W., & Samsuddin, M. E. (2012). The influence of CEO duality on the relationship between audit committee independence and earnings quality. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 919-924.
- Koh, P. S., Laplante, S. K., & Tong, Y. H. (2007). Accountability and value enhancement roles of corporate governance. Accounting and Finance, 47(2), 305-333.
- KPMG. (2015). IFRS convergence: A reality now.
- Krishnan, G., & Visvanathan, G. (2008). Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors accounting expertise and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(3), 827-858.
- Lee, E., Walker, M., & Zeng, C. (2013). Does IFRS Convergence Affect Financial Reporting Quality in China? (ACCA Research Report). Association of Chartered Certified Accountants & Certified Accountants Educational Trust, London.
- McNichols, M. (2002). Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 61–69.
- Nassar, M., & Jrisat, A. (2020). The application of corporate governance rules in the UAE. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 19(3), 223-244.
- Onuorah, Chi-Chi, A., & Friday, I. O. (2016). Corporate governance and financial reporting quality in selected Nigerian company. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 2(3), 7-16.
- Petra, S. T. (2007). The effects of corporate governance on the informativeness of earnings. Economics of Governance, 8, 129–152.
- Pucheta-Martinez, M. C., & De Fuentez, C. (2007). The impact of audit committee characteristics on the enhancement of the quality of financial reporting: An empirical study in the Spanish context. Corporate Governance, 15(6), 1394-1412.
- Rahman, R. A., & Ali, F. H. M. (2006). Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 783-804.
- Sarkar, J., Sarkar, S., & Sen, K. (2008). Board of directors and opportunistic earnings management: evidence from India. Journal of Auditing and Finance, 23(4), 269-286.
- Teoh, S., & Wong, T. (1993). Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficients. The Accounting Review, 68(2), 346-367.
- Van der Zahn, J.-L. W. M., & Tower, G. (2004). Audit committee features and earnings management: further evidence from Singapore. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(2/3), 233-258.
- Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(3), 613-633.
- Xie, B., Davidson, W., & DaDalt, P. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The roles of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295-317.
- Yang, J. S., & Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committees and quarterly earnings management. International Journal of Auditing, 9(3), 1-21.