Organizational support as a moderator on academic entrepreneurship performance in state universities
-
Author(s)Frida RamadiniLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6156-0915
,
Asep MulyanaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1661-2103
,
YunizarLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5332-834X
,
Kurniawan SaefullahLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3088-1078
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.10
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 125-137
- 51 Views
-
13 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Engaging in academic entrepreneurship enhances the potential for academics to generate scientific advancements, capitalize on findings, and create impactful contributions. This study examines how organizational support affects the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and role integration on academic entrepreneurship performance at state universities in Indonesia. The population includes lecturers from eleven state universities with research results that can be commercialized. A purposive sampling method selected 330 respondents, focusing on science and social sciences lecturers with research at a technological readiness level of 6 to 9, demonstrating pilot stages and commercialization readiness based on national assessments. Data analysis used variance-based structural equation modeling and partial least squares (PLS). The findings indicate that entrepreneurial orientation significantly affects academic entrepreneurship performance (p < 0.05), and role integration significantly affects academic entrepreneurship performance (p < 0.05). Additionally, organizational support moderates the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and academic entrepreneurship performance (p < 0.05), and organizational support moderates the relationship between role integration and academic entrepreneurship performance (p < 0.05).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the lecturers at eleven state universities in Indonesia who contributed to this investigation. Their assistance allowed the authors to obtain data that met the study criteria and generate accurate and exact data analysis per the research goals.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L26, M21, I23
-
References49
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
-
- Table 1. Characteristics of respondents
- Table 2. Composite reliability measurements
- Table 3. Loadings and cross-loading of variables
- Table 4. Path coefficient comparison
-
- Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2017). Gender patterns in academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 763-794.
- Ahmadpoor, M., & Jones, B. F. (2017). The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science, 357(6351), 583-587.
- Al-Kwifi, O. S., Petrovska, I., Parast, M., & Safari, A. (2023). Individual entrepreneurial orientation, self-efficacy, and managerial skills for project performance: An integrated structural approach and analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(6), 1634-1657.
- Buli, B. M., & Yesuf, W. M. (2015). Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions. Education + Training, 57(8/9), 891-907.
- Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., Martin, B. R., Chi, H.-R., & Tsai-Lin, T.-F. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity: A multilevel analysis. Technovation, 54, 7-21.
- Chin, W., Thatcher, J., & Wright, R. (2012). Assessing common method bias: Problems with the ULMC technique. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 1003-1019.
- Clayton, P., Feldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2018). Behind the scenes: Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 104-124.
- Colyvas, J., & Anderson, E. (2016). Institutionalization’s quadrant: Dimensionalizing levels in organizational analysis. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1).
- Covin, J. G., Rigtering, J. P. C., Hughes, M., Kraus, S., Cheng, C.-F., & Bouncken, R. B. (2020). Individual and team entrepreneurial orientation: Scale development and configurations for success. Journal of Business Research, 112, 1-12.
- Elbaz, A. M., Agag, G., & Alkathiri, N. A. (2017). How ability, motivation and opportunity influence travel agents performance: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1), 119-141.
- Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The entrepreneurial university: Vision and metrics. Industry and Higher Education, 30(2), 83-97.
- Fichter, K., & Tiemann, I. (2018). Factors influencing university support for sustainable entrepreneurship: Insights from explorative case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 512-524.
- Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., & Meoli, A. (2020). The effectiveness of university regulations to foster science-based entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 49(10), Article 104048.
- Fischer, B. B., Moraes, G. H. S. M. de, & Schaeffer, P. R. (2019). Universities’ institutional settings and academic entrepreneurship: Notes from a developing country. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 243-252.
- Guo, F., Zou, B., Guo, J., Shi, Y., Bo, Q., & Shi, L. (2019). What determines academic entrepreneurship success? A social identity perspective. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(3), 929-952.
- Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hayter, C., Nelson, A., Zayed, S., & O’Connor, A. (2018). Conceptualizing Academic Entrepreneurship Ecosystems: a Review, Analysis and Extension of the Literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 1039-1082.
- Hernandez, R., & Carrà, G. (2016). A conceptual approach for business incubator interdependencies and sustainable development. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 718-724.
- Huang, Y., Cai, X., Li, H., Niu, Z., & Cai, X. (2023). Exploring the factors influencing the psychological conditions of college students with financial difficulties based on structural equation modeling. Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (IC-ICAIE 2022) (pp. 1069-1077).
- Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Wright, M., & Pilva, E. (2014). Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: the case of a hybrid model. Small Business Economics, 43, 289-307.
- Ismail, N., Mohd Nor, J., & Sidek, S. (2015). A framework for a successful research products commercialisation: A case of Malaysian academic researchers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 283-292.
- Lidow, D. (2022). Chapter 6. Scaling supply. In The Entrepreneurs: The Relentless Quest for Value. Columbia University Press.
- Lopes, J. M., Oliveira, M., Oliveira, J., Sousa, M., Santos, T., & Gomes, S. (2021). Determinants of the entrepreneurial influence on academic entrepreneurship – Lessons learned from higher education students in Portugal. Education Sciences, 11(12), Article 771.
- Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
- Mars, M., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2010). Academic entrepreneurship (re)defined: Significance and implications for the scholarship of higher education. Higher Education, 59, 441-460.
- Meek, W. R., & Wood, M. S. (2016). Navigating a sea of change: Identity misalignment and adaptation in academic entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(5), 1093-1120.
- Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791.
- Miller, K., Alexander, A., Cunningham, J. A., & Albats, E. (2018). Entrepreneurial academics and academic entrepreneurs: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology Management, 77(1-3), 9-37.
- Miranda, F. J., Chamorro-Mera, A., & Rubio, S. (2017). Academic entrepreneurship in Spanish universities: An analysis of the determinants of entrepreneurial intention. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(2), 113-122.
- Nayem, S., Hossain, M., & Khatun, M. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of technology transfer and automation in universities: A case study on fostering entrepreneurship and start-up ecosystems at Bangladesh Open University.
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- O’Kane, C., Zhang, J. A., Daellenbach, U., & Davenport, S. (2019). Building entrepreneurial behaviours in academic scientists: Past perspective and new initiatives. In M. McAdam & J. A. Cunningham (Eds.), Entrepreneurial behaviour. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
- Oly Ndubisi, N. (2014). Entrepreneurship and service innovation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(6), 449-453.
- Peterson, R. A., & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 194-198.
- Qian, X.-D., Xia, J., Liu, W., & Tsai, S.-B. (2018). An empirical study on sustainable innovation academic entrepreneurship process model. Sustainability, 10(6), Article 1974.
- Ramarajan, L. (2014). Past, present and future research on multiple identities: Toward an intrapersonal network approach. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 589-659.
- Rathore, R. S., & Agrawal, R. (2021). Measuring performance of business incubators: A literature review and theoretical framework development. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Real, J. C., Roldán, J. L., & Leal, A. (2014). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: Analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 186-208.
- Saeed, S., Muffatto, M., & Yousafzai, S. (2014). A multi-level study of entrepreneurship education among Pakistani university students. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 4(3), 297-321.
- Salun, M., Zaslavska, K., & Zmicerevska, D. (2019). Entrepreneurial universities: Literature review. Economics of Development, 18, 12-18.
- Secundo, G., & Elia, G. (2014). A performance measurement system for academic entrepreneurship: A case study. Measuring Business Excellence, 18(3), 23-37.
- Sharma, D., Borna, S., & Stearns, J. (2009). An investigation of the effects of corporate ethical values on employee commitment and performance: Examining the moderating role of perceived fairness. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 251-260.
- Shaw, E., Gordon, J., Harvey, C., & Maclean, M. (2013). Exploring contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. International Small Business Journal, 31(5), 580-599.
- Singh, A., Singh, A., Kumar, S., & Gupta, V. (2015). Role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between role overload and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 41, 77-85.
- Skute, I. (2019). Opening the black box of academic entrepreneurship: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 120(1), 237-265.
- Valka, K., Roseira, C., & Campos, P. (2020). Determinants of university employee intrapreneurial behavior: The case of Latvian universities. Industry and Higher Education, 34(3), 190-202.
- Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C. (2017). Rethinking internal consistency in Cronbach’s alpha. Leisure Sciences, 39(2), 163-173.
- Wang, M., Soetanto, D., Cai, J., & Munir, H. (2022). Scientist or entrepreneur? Identity centrality, university entrepreneurial mission, and academic entrepreneurial intention. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(1), 119-146.
- Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2016). The innovation incubator, university business incubator and technology transfer strategy: The case of Thailand. Technology in Society, 46, 18-27.
-
The effect of talent management practices on employee turnover intention in the Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) sector: case of Jordan
Maha Al-Dalahmeh ,
Mária Héder-Rima ,
Krisztina Dajnoki
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.06
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #4 pp. 59-71 Views: 1836 Downloads: 1120 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis research aims to examine the intention of talented employees to leave an organization and discover how talent management practices could affect employee intention to leave an organization. This paper`s framework intends to outline the relationship between variables to present the idea of talent management practices and employee retention. The hypothesis was tested using a survey data set of 210 questionnaires collected from employees working in 82 ICT companies in Jordan to attain the research objectives. The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS program, and EMOS program, and basic and initial statistical techniques were applied. The results show that talent management practices significantly affect employee intention to leave an organization. Accordingly, whenever firms applied talent management practices, employee intention to leave decreases. The results demonstrated that attracting talented employees has emerged to have the strongest effect on decreasing employee intention to leave; however, developing and rewarding talented employees was revealed to have the lowest effect. Thus, the ICT firms’ managers have to generate specific training programs to reward and develop talented employees.
Acknowledgment
The publication is supported by the EU-funded Hungarian grant EFOP-3.6.3.-VEKOP-16-2017-00007 for the project entitled “From Talent to Young Researchers” – Supporting the Career-developing Activities of Researchers in Higher Education”. -
Entrepreneurial orientation and its impact on firm growth amongst SMEs in South Africa
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #3 pp. 166-178 Views: 1692 Downloads: 573 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯEntrepreneurial orientation (EO) has been widely touted as a fundamental ingredient for enhancing firm growth. Consequently, this aimed at examining the impact of EO and its dimensional variables (innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness) on SME growth (employment, sales, and asset growth). Using information from 285 SMEs, the results obtained indicated that while EO had a significant positive association with SME growth (employment and sales growth), most SMEs show a moderate level of EO. Also, following the EO dimensions, the findings established the emergence of proactive innovation (a combination of proactiveness and innovativeness) which showed a significant positive association on sales growth. Risk-taking was the only factor that showed a significant influence on employment and asset growth. This study also showed that controlling for the effect of firm age on growth significantly reduced the error of predicting sales growth by 2.3%. This study culminates with recommendations on enhancing EO amongst SMEs in South Africa.
-
The effect of leadership, organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior on service quality
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 (cont. 1) pp. 197-203 Views: 1213 Downloads: 756 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe purpose of this research is to study the effect of leadership, organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior on service quality of the Chairman of the study program at the State University of Jakarta. This research used a quantitative approach with a survey method. The research population was Chairmen of the study program of Universities Jakarta. The research sample was 64 Chairmen of the study program selected randomly. Data were obtained from questionnaires and, then, analyzed using descriptive statistics, path analysis and inferential statistics. These results indicate that the Leadership has a direct positive effect on Service Quality, Organizational Support has a direct positive effect on Service Quality, Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) has a direct positive effect on Service Quality, Leadership has a direct positive effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), Organizational Support has a direct positive effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) and the Leadership has a direct positive effect on Organizational Support. Thus, to improve the service quality, the Leadership, as well as the Organizational Support and OCB, should be improved.
