Non-performing financing of Islamic rural bank industry in Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(1).2019.03
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2019, Issue #1, pp. 20-28
- Cited by
- 1751 Views
-
242 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study is aimed at analyzing the financial performance and indicator of macroeconomics to influence the quality of financing at Islamic Rural Bank Industry (IRBI) in Indonesia. The panel data regression is used to predict the change of quality of financing which is reflected by value of non-performing financing (NPF). The model of this study is grouped by four areas of working zones because IRBI has different competency depending on its region. The sample of the study used 72 IRBIs in the periods of Quarter II 2010 to Quarter I 2016. The results of the study show that simultanuously variables for the size of banks, financing to deposit ratio (FDR), operational efficiency ratio (OER), return on equity (ROE), expense to assets (EA), percentage of gross domestic product (GDP), and the rate of inflation are statistically significant to non-performing financing of the IRBI in Indonesia. GDP has strongly significant impact on the NPF of IRBI in Indonesia. According to Areas of working zones, inflation has quite significant impact on the IRBI in Zone One, and GDP has strongly significant impact on the IRBI in Zone Two, Zone Three, and Zone Four. Nevertheless, there are different effects of GDP towards NPF which has a negative impact on Zone One and Zone Four, meanwhile Zone Two and Zone Three have positive impact. In conclusion, government policy treatment should be different at every zone.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E50, G21
-
References14
-
Tables2
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. NPF model by working zones
- Table 2. NPF model by working zones
-
- Berger, A. N., & DeYoung, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 21(6), 849-870.
- Bloem, A. M., & Gorter, C. N. (2001). The Treatment of Nonperforming Loans in Macroeconomic Statistitics (IMF Working Paper Series, WP/01/209).
- Buchori, A., Himawan, B., Setijawan, E., & Rohmah, N. (2003). Kajian Kinerja Industri BPRS Di Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 5(4), 64-123.
- Endut, R., Syuhada, N., Ismail, F., & Mahmood, W. M. W. (2013). Macroeconomic implications on non-performing loans in Asian Pacific Region. World Applied Sciences Journal, 23(23), 57-60.
- Espinoza, R., & Prasad, A. (2010). Nonperforming Loans in the GCC Banking System and their Macroeconomic Effects (IMF Working Papers, 2010/224).
- Faiz, I. A. (2010). Ketahanan Kredit Perbankan Syariah terhadap Krisis Keuangan Global. La RIba: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 4(2), 217-237.
- Firmansyah, I. (2014). Determinant of Non Performing Loan : the Case of Islamic Bank in Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 17(2), 241-258.
- Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
- Klein, N. (2013). Non-Performing Loans in CESEE: Determinants and Impact on Macroeconomic Performance (IMF Working Paper Series, 2013/72).
- Louzis, D. P., Vouldis, A. T., & Metaxas, V. L. (2012). Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece: A comparative study of mortgage, business and consumer loan portfolios. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(4), 1012-1027.
- Schmidheiny, K. (2018). Panel Data: FIxed and Random Effects. Short Guides to Microeconometrics, Fall, 1-16.
- Skarica, B. (2014). Determinants of non-performing loans in Central and Eastern European countries. Financial Theory and Practice, 38(1), 37-59.
- The World Bank. (2013). The New Microfinance Handbook. J. Ledgerwood (Ed.). Washington DC: The World Bank.
- Zaini Abd Karim, M., Chan, S.-G., & Hassan, S. (2010). Bank Efficiency and Non-Performing Loans: Evidence from Malaysia and Singapore. Prague Economic Papers, 19(2), 118-132.