Non-economic determinants of social and labor development – 21st
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/slrtp.13(1).2023.02
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2023, Issue #1, pp. 15-30
- Cited by
- 184 Views
-
43 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The article contains scientific argumentation of social and labor development of the first half of the 21ST century, which is increasingly acquiring features of instability and human(non)centricity. The quintessence of the presented theoretical and applied discourse is the substantiation of the need to overcome economic centrism, increase the role and importance of uneconomic factors of sustainable social progress in ensuring balanced social and labor development in the new socio-economic reality; The authors' construct of moral, ethical, spiritual, cultural dimension of competitive advantages in the context of dialectical unity of the economic and non-economic. The article is aimed at promoting a fundamental rethinking of the philosophy of sustainable social and labor development, which is centered on the priority of attitudes, values, beliefs of a moral, spiritual, ethical, solidarity, socially responsible, socio-cultural nature, which are conventionally called uneconomic and should become the leading pillars of the new digital world of economy and the world of the people themselves. The methodological research platform is an organic combination of systemic and interdisciplinary approaches using general scientific and special research methods. The worldview failures in understanding the non-economic aspects of human life in digital age are highlighted; the emphasis is placed on the distorted view of the role, place, and mission of the non-economic in ensuring sustainable development. The necessity of using a new conceptology, a new development strategy based on the principles of human-centrism is substantiated; the potential of solidarity and consolidation in network forms of interaction between subjects of social relations is proven. The range of phenomena and processes that act as "clots" on the way to sustainable social and labor development based on trust, inclusion, cohesion, solidarity, consolidation, responsibility, culture in its broadest sense is outlined, and, on the contrary, the factors that increase the role of the non-economic in ensuring sustainable social and labor development and overcoming the deepest crisis of our time are identified. The authors argue that the "new science", the new economic theory of social progress, facilitated by published foundations, must offer a different philosophy, different principles, and drivers of sustainable social and labor development, which are almost the exact opposite of the dominant postulates of growth, which is often not accompanied by development.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)J00, P49
-
References17
-
Tables0
-
Figures0
-
- Baecker, D. (2019). Digitalisation and the next society.
- Basu, K. (2016). Beyond the Invisible Hand: Groundwork for a New Economics (Ed. 1, No.9299). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Bowles, S. (2016). The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens (288 p.). New Haven: Yale University Press New Haven and London.
- Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives (124 p.). Abingdon: Routledge.
- Heyets, V. (2022). Social reality in the digital space. Economy of Ukraine, 1, 3–28. (In Ukrainian).
- Heyets, V. (2023). On the question of theory and practice of social quality policy in post-war Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 4, 3–22. (In Ukrainian).
- Hrytsenko, A. (2021). Economic policy of the state. Economic Theory and Law, 4, 145–150. (In Ukrainian).
- Hrytsenko, A., & Burlaj, T. (2020). The impact of digitalization on social development. Economic theory, 3, 24–51. (In Ukrainian).
- Kolot, A. (2011). Dialektyka ekonomichnogho i socialjnogho rozvytku jak predmet naukovykh doslidzhenj [Dialectics of Economic and Social Development as a Subject of Scientific Research]. Ukrajina: aspekty praci – Ukraine: labor aspects, 5, 3–8. (In Ukrainian).
- Kolot, A., & Herasymenko, O. (2018). Trust as an institute in the mirror of new challenges, imperatives and possibilities of socio-economic development. Social and Labour Relations: Theory and Practice, 8(2), 8–26. (In Ukrainian).
- Kolot, A., & Herasymenko, O. (2021). Pratsia XXI: filosofiia zmin, vyklyky, vektory rozvytku [Work XXI: philosophy of change, challenges, vectors of development] (487 p.). Kyiv: KNEU. (In Ukrainian).
- Kolot, A., & Herasymenko, O. (2022). To the philosophy of moral economy: conceptology of anthropocentrism (Part I). Demography and Social Economy, 3(49), 65–88. (In Ukrainian).
- Kolot, A., & Herasymenko, O. (2022). To the philosophy of moral economy: conceptology of anthropocentrism (Part II). Demography and Social Economy, 4(50), 90–117. (In Ukrainian).
- Kostrycja, V., & Burlaj, T. (2023). Current priorities of social development: impact of global transformations and Ukraine’s tasks in the (post)war period. Economy of Ukraine, 4, 97–116. (In Ukrainian).
- Work for a brighter future (2019). Global Commission on the Future of Work. Geneva: ILO.
- Zvjerjakov, M. (2023). Concept of social market economy in the post-war recovery of Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 3, 3–23. (In Ukrainian).