Investor behavior under the Covid-19 pandemic: the case of Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(3).2020.23
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #3, pp. 308-318
- Cited by
- 3208 Views
-
701 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study begins with the assumption that the existence of abnormal circumstances will force investors to take measures to protect their investments in the capital market. Recently, the stock index in the Indonesian market has been declining and continued to fall until the end of April 2020 due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. In terms of efficient market theory, prospect theory and signaling theory, this study aims to analyze the relationship between risk and return in the Indonesian capital market during the Covid-19 pandemic as a manifestation of investor behavior. To test hypotheses, the correlation test, the independent sample t-test and the Cohen test for 629 public firms with 52,836 observable data are used. The findings show that for financial sectors and non-financial sectors, the fourth period differs from previous periods when the relationship between systematic risk and stock returns is positive, although only non-financial sectors have a significant effect. The results show that efficient market theory, prospect theory and signaling theory are consistent with the phenomena around the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. In addition, Cohen’s test results suggest that government policies in the face of the pandemic are successful in stimulating the market.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G11, G18, G41
-
References32
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Correlation analysis (systematic risk is stock beta)
- Table 3. Correlation analysis (systematic risk is the coefficient of determination)
- Table 4. Independent sample t-test
- Table 5. Effect size test
-
- Aliu, F., Pavelkova, D., & Dehning, B. (2017). Portfolio risk-return analysis: The case of the automotive industry in the Czech Republic. Journal of International Studies, 10(4), 72-83.
- Bali, T., & Cakici, N. (2008). Idiosyncratic volatility and the cross section of expected returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(1), 29-58.
- Barberis, N. C. (2013). Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173-96.
- Barberis, N., Mukherjee, A., & Wang, B. (2016). Prospect theory and stock returns: An empirical test. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(11), 3068-3107.
- Beal, D. J., Goyen, M., & Philips, P. (2005). Why do we invest ethically? The Journal of Investing, 14(3), 66-78.
- Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’Zali, B. (2018). Social performance and firm risk: Impact of the financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 149,643-669.
- Bozhkov, S., Lee, H., Sivarajah, U., Despoudi, S., & Nandy, M. (2018). Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of stock returns: The role of mean-reverting idiosyncratic volatility. Annals of Operations Research, 1-34.
- Budiarso, N., & Pontoh, W. (2019). Does maturity signals high risk and high return? Indonesia Accounting Journal, 1(1), 1-5.
- Daniel, K., & Hirshleifer, D. (2015). Overconfident investors, predictable returns, and excessive trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4), 61-88.
- Dreman, D. N., & Lufkin, E.A. (2000). Investor overreaction: Evidence that its basis is psychological. The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 1(1), 61-75.
- Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
- Fama, E. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575-1617.
- Fama, E. (1998). Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 283-306.
- Fama, E., & MacBeth, J. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607-636
- Fiegenbaum, A., & Thomas, H. (1988). Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox: Prospect theory explanations. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 85-106.
- Frazzini, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). Betting against beta. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 1-25.
- Grinblatt, M., & Han, B. (2005). Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 311-339.
- Harvey, C. (1989). Time-varying conditional covariances in tests of asset pricing models. Journal of Financial Economics, 24(2), 289-317.
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
- Lee, D., & Faff, R.(2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. The Financial Review, 44(2), 213-237.
- Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37.
- Liu, B., & Di Iorio, A. (2016). The pricing of idiosyncratic volatility: An Australian study. Australian Journal of Management, 41(2), 353-375.
- Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59-82.
- Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
- Mollik, A., & Bepari, M. (2015). Risk-return trade-off in emerging markets: Evidence from Dhaka Stock Exchange Bangladesh. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 9(1), 71-88.
- OuYang, Z., Xu, J., Wei, J., & Liu, Y. (2017). Information asymmetry and investor reaction to corporate crisis: Media reputation as a stock market signal. Journal of Media Economics, 30(2), 82-95.
- Ross, S. (1977). The determination of financial structure: The incentive-signalling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23-40.
- Shen, C., & Chih, H. (2005). Investor protection, prospect theory, and earnings management: An international comparison of the banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(10), 2675-2697.
- Shubiri, F., & Jamil, S. (2018). The impact of idiosyncratic risk of banking sector on oil, stock market, and fiscal indicators of Sultanate of Oman. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 10, 1-8.
- Stålnacke, O. (2019). Individual investors’ information use, subjective expectations, and portfolio risk and return. The European Journal of Finance, 25(15), 1351-1376.
- Vo, D. H., Pham, T. N., Pham, T. T. V., Truong, L. M., & Nguyen, T. C. (2019). Risk, return and portfolio optimization for various industries in the ASEAN region. Borsa Istanbul Review, 19(2), 132-138.
- Wolski, R. (2017). Risk and return in the real estate, bond and stock markets. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 25(3), 15-22.