Innovative controlling and audit – opportunities for SMEs
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.15
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #3, pp. 184-195
- Cited by
- 968 Views
-
260 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This research is oriented to SME’s innovation activities, its management system and competitiveness based on innovations. Research is focused on causalities between innovative controlling, audit, enterprise innovation activities and the results put in context with ROA, ROE, turnover. Data for this research were collected in 317 European SMEs by researches by using questionnaire and analyzed by advanced statistical methods. The aim of this research is to identify key factors for successful innovation enterprise activities, to define weaknesses and common mistakes. Secondary aim is to design controlling process for SME’s innovation activities. The findings of this research are opening up topics for further research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L11, L15, M10, M15, M42
-
References30
-
Tables2
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Main principle of innovative controlling
-
- Table 1. Correlation analysis of variables
- Table 2. Correlation analysis between the innovation plan and the financial analysis indicators
-
- Belás, J., Dvorský, J., Kubálek, J., & Smrčka, L. (2018). Important factors of financial risk in the SME segment. Journal of International Studies, 11(1), 80-92.
- Belas, J., Smrcka, L., Gavurova, B., & Dvorsky, J. (2018). The impact of social and economic factors in the credit risk management of SME. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(3), 1289-1304.
- Benedic, N. O. (2015). The Challenge of Controlling. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJIEM), 6(4), 153-163.
- Dobrovic, J., Gallo, P., Mihalcova, B., Stofova, L., & Szaryszova, P. (2018). Competitiveness Measurement in Terms of the Europe 2020 Strategy. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(4), 21-37.
- Draheim, D. (2010). Business Process Technology: A Unified View on Business Processes, Workflows and Enterprise Applications (306 p.). Berlin: Springer.
- Goffin, K., & Mitchell, R. (2017). Innovation Management: Effective Strategy and Implementation (3rd ed.) (440 p.). London: Palgrave.
- Goller, I., & Bessant, J. (2017). Creativity for Innovation Management (332 p.). New York: Routledge.
- Jespersen, K., Rigamonti, D., Jensen, M. B., & Bysted, R. (2018). Analysis of SMEs partner proximity preferences for process innovation. Small Business Economics, 51(4), 879-904.
- Jukka, K., Niskanen, M., & Niskanen, J. (2018). The effect of audit partner gender on modified audit opinions. International Journal of Auditing, 22(3), 449-463.
- Kamps, T. (2013). Systematic Chasing for Economic Success: An Innovation Management Approach (120 p.). Hamburg: Anchor.
- Khudhaira, D. Z., Al-Zubaidia, F. K. A., & Raji, A. A. (2018). The effect of board characteristics and audit committee characteristics on audit quality. Management Science Letters, 9, 271-282.
- Kupec, V. (2017). Digital Possibilities of Internal Audit. Acta VŠFS, 11(1), 28-44.
- Laval, V. (2018). How to Increase the Value-added of Controlling (215 p.). Berlin: Gruyter.
- Mares, D., & Dlasková, G. (2016). Small and Medium-Sized Enterprizes – Opportunities and Challenges. European Research Studies Journal, 19(4), 78-87.
- Mares, D., & Petra, N. (2018). Stabilization factors of family enterprises in the context of macroeconomic performance. European Research Studies Journal, 21(1), 206-220.
- McKinsey and Company (2017). Digital Czech Republic: How we grow (120 p.). Praha.
- Moeller, R. R. (2011). COSO Enterprise Risk Management: Establishing Effective Governance, Risk, and Compliance (2nd ed.) (384 p.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
- Mohammadrezaei, F., & Mohd-Saleh, N. (2018). Audit report lag: the role of auditor type and increased competition in the audit market. Accounting and Finance, 58(3), 885-920.
- Müller, J. M., & Däschle, S. (2018). Business Model Innovation of Industry 4.0 Solution Providers Towards Customer Process Innovation. Processes, 6(12), 1-19.
- Nwaiwu, F. (2018). Review and Comparison of Conceptual Frameworks on Digital Business Transformation. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(3), 86-100.
- Petrů, N., Havlíček, K., & Tomášková, A. (2018). Comparison of Marketing Vitality of Family and Non Family Companies doing Business in the Czech Republic. Economics and Sociology, 11(2), 138-156.
- Písař, P., & Havlíček, K. (2018). Advanced Controlling and Information Systems Methods as a Tool for Cohesion and Competitiveness of the European Union (1172 p.). Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on European Integration 2018. Ostrava.
- Řepa, V. (2012). Podnikové procesy – procesní řízení a modelování [Business Processes – Process Management and Modeling] (2nd ed.) (304 p.). Praha: Grada.
- Spencer Pickett, K. H. (2010). The Internal Auditing Handbook (3rd ed.) (1088 p.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
- Stanculescu, E. (2015). Innovation activity of small and medium enterprises in the European Union. Summary of supported concerns and poor results. Knowledge Horizons. Economics, 7(2), 72-76.
- Svozilová, A. (2011). Zlepšování podnikových procesů [Improvement of Business Processes] (232 p.). Praha: Grada.
- Vitezić, N., & Vitezić, V. (2015). A Conceptual Model of Linkage Between Innovation Management and Controlling in the Sustainable Environment. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(1), 175-185.
- Weske, M. (2012). Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures (2nd ed.) (404 p.). Berlin: Springer.
- Zacharias, N. (2011). An Integrative Approach to Innovation Management: Patterns of Companies (97 p.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
- Zaušková, A., Bobovnický, A., & Madleňák, A. (2013). How can the state support the innovations to build sustainable competitive advantage of the country. Serbian Journal of Management, 8(2), 255-267.