Good governance: Role in the coherence of tax competition and shadow economy
-
Author(s)Oleksiy MazurenkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5925-3692
,
Inna TiutiunykLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5883-2940
,
Dymytrii GrytsyshenLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1559-2403
,
Ferdinand DaňoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-781X
,
Artem ArtyukhovLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-6891
,
Robert RehakLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0303-9379
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.56
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #4, pp. 757-770
- Cited by
- 254 Views
-
75 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The formation of the country’s tax competitiveness and countering the shadowing of the economy depend on several factors. One of them is an effective public administration. It defines state policy vectors, institutions’ critical tasks, and business and society development priorities. The aim of the paper is to analyze the impact of good governance on the country’s tax competitiveness and the level of the shadow economy of 11 EU countries and Ukraine in 2011–2021. The study employs statistical analysis of data series. It constructs a correlation field of points of relationship between indicators (to determine the general trends of changes in the level of the shadow economy, tax competitiveness, and the Good Governance Index). Linear mathematical model and Fishburn formula are used to construct an integral indicator of the level of efficiency of public management (Good Governance Index). Structural modeling methods formalize the influence of government management on the level of the shadow economy and tax competitiveness. It was found that the Government Efficiency Index and the Corruption Control Index exert the most significant correlation with the level of tax competitiveness and the shadow economy. Its increase of 1% leads to a rise in the level of tax competitiveness of Slovakia by 7.015%, Croatia by 6.889%, the Czech Republic by 6.606%, and Romania by 5.773%. At the same time, the smallest correlation with the level of tax competitiveness performs an Index of Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism.
Acknowledgment
The study is funded by the project VEGA – 1/0392/23 “Changes in the approach to the creation of companies’ distribution management concepts influenced by the effects of social and economic crises caused by the global pandemic and increased security risks.”
The authors are grateful to the participants of projects 0123U101945 and 0122U000777 for numerous discussions and comments.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O17, H26
-
References46
-
Tables4
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Normality of the distribution and descriptive statistics of the level of the shadow economy for 11 countries for 2011–2021
- Figure 2. Normality of the distribution and descriptive statistics of the level of tax competitiveness for 11 countries for 2011–2021
- Figure 3. Normality of the distribution and descriptive statistics of the Good Governance Index for 11 countries for 2011–2021
- Figure 4. Correlation field of points of relationship between the shadow economy and the Good Governance Index in a section of 11 countries for 2011–2021
- Figure 5. Correlation field of points of relationship between the level of tax competitiveness and the Good Governance Index for 11 countries for 2011–2021
-
- Table 1. Weighting coefficients of indicators for assessing the country’s Good Governance Index
- Table 2. Evaluation results of Good Governance Index
- Table 3. Frequency distribution of Good Governance Index values
- Table А1. Parameters of the structural equations of the formalization of the influence of the Good Governance Index on the level of tax competitiveness
-
- Atwood, T. J., Drake, M. S., Myers, J. N., & Myers, L. A. (2012). Home country tax system characteristics and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 1831-1860.
- Baklouti, N., & Boujelbene, Y. (2020). Shadow economy, corruption, and economic growth: An empirical analysis. The Review of Black Political Economy, 47(3), 276-294.
- Berdiev, A. N., Saunoris, J. W., & Schneider, F. (2020). Poverty and the shadow economy: The role of governmental institutions. The World Economy, 43(4), 921-947.
- Bird, R. M., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2008). Tax effort in developing countries and high income countries: The impact of corruption, voice and accountability. ECON Publications, 38(1).
- Canh, P. N., Schinckus, C., & Thanh, S. D. (2021). What are the drivers of shadow economy? A further evidence of economic integration and institutional quality. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(1), 47-67.
- Council of the European Union. (2018). Council Conclusions on the “EU Standard Provision on Good Governance in Tax Matters for Agreements with Third Countries”. Brussels.
- Dreher, A., & Schneider, F. (2006). Corruption and the shadow economy: An empirical analysis (KOF Working paper No 06-123). KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
- Dreher, A., Kotsogiannis, C., & McCorriston, S. (2009). How do institutions affect corruption and the shadow economy? International Tax and Public Finance, 16, 773-796.
- Dzwigol, H. (2020). Methodological and empirical platform of triangulation in strategic management. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 1-8.
- Dzwigol, H. (2023). The quality determinants of the research process in management sciences. Virtual Economics, 6(2), 35-54.
- Dźwigoł, H., & Trzeciak, M. (2023). Pragmatic methodology in management science. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 11(1), 67-90.
- European Commission. (2014). Tax reforms in EU member states 2014: Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fiscal sustainability. European Union: Economic and Financial Affairs.
- Gao, M., & Liu, X. (2021). Tax burden, institutional environment and foreign direct investment flow: From the perspective of asymmetric international tax competition. China Finance and Economic Review, 10(1), 66-85.
- Giedraitis, V., Stavytskyy, A., Kharlamova, G., & Ulvidienė, E. (2023). Bring on the light: Reduction of the corporate shadow economy by tax reform. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 4(21).
- Gnangnon, S. K. (2023). Effect of the shadow economy on tax reform in developing countries. Economies, 11(3), 96.
- Gupta, S., & Jalles, J. T. (2022). Do tax reforms affect income distribution? Evidence from developing countries. Economic Modelling, 110, 105804.
- Hji Panayi, C. (2018). The globalisation of tax good governance (Singapore Management University School of Accountancy Research Paper Series No. 2018-S-74).
- Keen, M. (2008). Tax competition. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Kharazishvili, Y., Kwilinski, A., Grishnova, O., & Dzwigol, H. (2020). Social safety of society for developing countries to meet sustainable development standards: Indicators, level, strategic benchmarks (with calculations based on the case study of Ukraine). Sustainability, 12(21), 8953.
- Khuong, N. V, Ha, N. T. T., Minh, M. T. H., & Thu, P. A. (2019). Does corporate tax avoidance explain cash holdings? The case of Vietnam. Economics & Sociology, 12(2), 79-93.
- Kozmenko, S., & Belova, I. (2015). Peculiarities of identification of systemically important banks and assessment of their impact of the occurrence of economic crisis. Banks and Bank Systems, 10(3), 39-48.
- Kuzior, A., Babenko, V., Rekunenko, І., & Pohodenko, B. (2023). The current state of scientific research of the process of risk management of Ukrainian energy sector enterprises. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 31(3) 322-331.
- Kuzmenko, O., Šuleř, P., Lyeonov, S., Judrupa, I., & Boiko, A. (2020). Data mining and bifurcation analysis of the risk of money laundering with the involvement of financial institutions. Journal of International Studies, 13(3), 332-339.
- Kwilinski, A., Vyshnevskyi, O., & Dzwigol, H. (2020). Digitalization of the EU Economies and People at Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(7), 142.
- Liakhovets, O. (2014). Tax incentives effectiveness for the innovation activity of industrial enterprizes in Ukraine. Economics & Sociology, 7(1), 72-84.
- Liu, Y., & Feng, H. (2015). Tax structure and corruption: Cross-country evidence. Public Choice, 162, 57-78.
- Lyeonov, S., Tiutiunyk, I., Vasekova, M., Dziubenko, O., & Samchyk, M. (2022). Tax, investment, institutional and social channels of economic shadowing: Challenges for macro-financial stability and good governance. Public and Municipal Finance, 11(1), 128-141.
- Lyeonov, S., Vasilyeva, T., Bilan, Y., & Bagmet, K. (2021). Convergence of the institutional quality of the social sector: The path to inclusive growth. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 14(3), 272-291.
- Nadirov, O., Dehning, B., & Pavelkova, D. (2021). Taxes and the incentive to work under flat and progressive tax systems in Slovakia. Economics & Sociology, 14(2), 40-55.
- Němec, D., Kotlánová, E., Kotlán, I., & Machová, Z. (2021). Corruption, taxation and the impact on the shadow economy. Economies, 9(1), 18.
- Owens, J. (2015). Promoting good tax governance in third-countries: The role of the EU. European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Financial Affairs.
- Periansya, P., Dewata, E., Sopiyan A. R., Sari, Y., & Abdul, B. (2023). Whistleblowing, fraud prevention, and fraud awareness: Evidence from the Palembang Local Government of Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2), 556-566.
- Picur, R. D., & Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2006). The impact of bureaucracy, corruption and tax compliance. Review of Accounting and Finance, 5(2), 174-180.
- Rixen, T. (2011). From double tax avoidance to tax competition: Explaining the institutional trajectory of international tax governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18(2), 197-227.
- Shahab, M. R., Pajooyan, J., & Ghaffari, F. (2015). The effect of corruption on shadow economy: An empirical analysis based on panel data. International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 7(1), 85-100.
- Shkolnyk, I., Kozmenko, S., Kozmenko, O., Orlov, V., & Shukairi, F. (2021). Modeling of the financial system’s stability on the example of Ukraine. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 377-411.
- Silalahi, S., Hanif, R. A., Supriono, S., Hariyani, E., & Wiguna, M. (2023). Determinants influencing fraud prevention in e-procurement: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Innovative Marketing, 19(4), 199-206.
- Thießen, U. (2003). The impact of fiscal policy and deregulation on shadow economies in transition countries: The case of Ukraine. Public Choice, 114, 295-318.
- Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2009). The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 228-245.
- Torgler, B., Schneider, F., & Schaltegger, C. A. (2010). Local autonomy, tax morale, and the shadow economy. Public Choice, 144(1/2), 293-321.
- Ulvidienė, E., Meškauskaitė, I., Stavytskyy, A., & Giedraitis, V. R. (2023). An investigation of the influence of economic growth on taxes in Lithuania. Ekonomika, 102(1).
- Vasilyeva, T., Kuzmenko, O., Bozhenko, V., & Kolotilina, O. (2019). Assessing the dynamics of bifurcation transformations in the economy. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2422, 134-146.
- Vasylyeva, T. A., Leonov, S. V., & Lunyakov, O. V. (2014). Countercyclical capital buffer as a macroprudential tool for regulation of the financial sector. Actual Problems of Economics, 158(8), 278-283.
- Waladali, E., & Rabaiah, A. (2022). Impact of e-government maturity on public servants’ job satisfaction. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(3), 501-515.
- Wilson, J. D., & Wildasin, D. E. (2004). Capital tax competition: Bane or boon. Journal of Public Economics, 88(6), 1065-1091.
- Xanthopoulou, P., Antoniadis, I., & Avlogiaris, G. (2023). Unveiling the drivers of digital governance adoption in public administration. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(4), 454-467.
-
Positive contribution of the good corporate governance rating to stability and performance: evidence from Indonesia
RR. Iramani , Muazaroh Muazaroh , Abdul Mongid
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.01
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 1-11 Views: 3157 Downloads: 309 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper aims to examine the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) practice on bank stability and performance. Governance is measured using the GCG rating that covers eleven aspects. The authors apply instrumental regression to link governance to performance and stability. The study covers a sample of 150 banks. The result shows that bank stability can mediate bank governance and bank performance. On the determinant of bank performance, it can be concluded that the GCG rating is positive and directly influences bank performance. Bank stability is also positive for bank performance indicating the indirect contribution of the GCG rating to bank performance. NPL, LDR, CAR and bank’s size (LASSET) are all negative and significant. The aim of this paper is to provide strong empirical evidence on the importance of governance and stability for performance. The limitations of this paper are the size of the sample and that it only covers public banks which are theoretically required to apply better governance in all aspects of their business by the Capital Market Authority.
-
Level of shadow economy in Ukraine: reasons and ways to overcome
Alina Bukhtiarova ,
Arsen Hayriyan ,
Nataliia Vynokurova
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.07(1).2018.01
Public and Municipal Finance Volume 7, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 6-11 Views: 1799 Downloads: 142 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe article offers an investigation of the level of the shadow economy in Ukraine in the period 2007–2016, the structure of the shadow (“grey”) economy in the sectoral section, Ukraine’s place in world rankings in terms of economic freedom, corruption, favorable business conditions, and competitiveness. The main reasons of high level of shadow sector of the national economy are considered, and several measures regarding the reduction of the shadow economy in Ukraine and improvement of its economic situation are presented.
-
Accountability and integrity as unique column of good governance
Noluthando Matsiliza ,
Nyaniso Zonke
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.06(1).2017.08
Public and Municipal Finance Volume 6, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 75-82 Views: 1378 Downloads: 968 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe authors contend that accountability and integrity in public affairs are best preserved through enhancement of an integral system of legal prescripts, law, institutional policies and protocols. In the post-apartheid, South African public officials and political office bearers have been continuously criticized for allegedly transgressing ethical codes. Democracy has been tested due to violations of accountability, integrity and misconducts in the South African public service. However, this study argues that integrity can be enhanced when the society and those that are governing can preserve through specialized institutions legislation where law-makers are working with civil society to instill the culture of integrity.It is imperative to balance what is required for public officials’ conduct and what is done through parliamentary controls and certain caveats of highest honor. The value of accountability and integrity in public affairs can enjoy a resurgence in the last and present decade as the arrangements for public officials to operate in an environment that promotes good governance. This study reveals some concerns over the lack of commitment to preserve existing structures that could serve as mechanisms to promote good governance. A qualitative document analysis is employed to draw data from literature review. This paper’s findings contribute towards ethics and good governance in public administration.
