Gender diversity and financial performance in executive positions in German companies
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.44
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #2, pp. 571-581
- Cited by
- 273 Views
-
86 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
An underrepresentation of women in executive positions has persisted for decades. This paper aims to analyze the financial impact of women in executive positions in German companies by examining the economic value added and exploring the effects of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors and female supervisory board members on female board members. The results indicate that in the 200 largest German companies, the share of female executives increased between 2018 and 2022. Regardless of industry, female executives started at very low levels at around 4% in 2018; in 2022, this figure reached around 11%. Thereby, the financial sector showed the highest share of female executives at around 14% in 2022, and the industrial sector at around 9%. A closer look reveals that large companies have higher shares of female executives than smaller companies. Large companies show an average of 17% compared to small ones, and in 2022, only 8%. There is a positive correlation between the share of female supervisory board members and female executives, arguing that female supervisory board members seem to hire more female executives. Companies with more female executives tend to have lower ESG controversy scores, and companies with more female executives, measured by the economic value added, perform better financially than companies with few or no women. Companies with female executives show about 2 percentage points higher economic value added than those with the lowest share of females (no or few female executives). Thus, it seems that female executives matter and make a difference in companies.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G40, J16
-
References52
-
Tables3
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Female executive members in German top 200 companies
- Figure 2. Share of female supervisory board members and related female executives
- Figure 3. EVA shortfall sorted by the number of female executives
-
- Table 1. Summary statistics
- Table 2. Female executive members in German top 200 companies by sector
- Table 3. Controversies based on female executive representation
-
- Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 2, 291-309.
- Agyemang-Mintah, P., & Schadewitz, H. (2019). Gender diversity and firm value: Evidence from UK financial institutions. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 27(1), 2-26.
- Allbright. (2015). Einsam an der Spitze [Lonely at the top]. (In German).
- Bechtoldt, M., Voigt, M., & Bannier, C. (2016). The ceiling trumps the cliff – Gender-related promotion patterns to executive boards in DAX-firms. SSRN Electronic Journals.
- Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A., & Savioli, M. (2019). The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1485-1499.
- Brady, D., Isaacs, K., Reeves, M., Burroway, R., & Reynolds, M. (2011). Sector, size, stability, and scandal. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 26(1), 84-105.
- Brahma, S., Nwafor, C., & Boateng, A. (2021). Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(4), 5704-5719.
- Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428-442.
- Campuzano, M. (2019). Force and inertia: A systematic review of women’s leadership in male-dominated organizational cultures in the United States. Human Resource Development Review, 18(4), 437-469.
- Chauhan, J., & Mishra, G. (2021). Barriers to career advancement of women: Role of mentoring and networks. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 22(4), 369-393.
- Cohen, L., Broschak, J., & Haveman, H. (1998). And then there were more? The effect of organizational sex composition on the hiring and promotion of managers. American Sociological Review, 63(5), 711-727.
- Cook, A., & Glass, C. (2014). Women and top leadership positions: Towards an institutional analysis. Gender, Work & Organization, 21(1), 91-103.
- Cuddy, A., Fiske, S., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 701-718.
- Dezsö, C., & Ross, D. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089.
- Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, A., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2013). Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation, 15(2), 149-160.
- Ehrbar, A. (1999). EVA Economic Value Added: Der Schlüssel zur wertsteigernden Unternehmensführung [EVA Economic Value Added: The key to value-adding corporate management]. Springer. (In German).
- Ervin, J., Taouk, Y., Alfonzo, L., Hewitt, B., & King, T. (2022). Gender differences in the association between unpaid labour and mental health in employed adults: A systematic review. The Lancet Public Health, 7(9), e775-e786.
- Etaugh, C., & Folger, D. (1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39(3/4), 215-223.
- Farré, L., Fawaz, Y., González, L., & Graves, J. (2022). Gender inequality in paid and unpaid work during Covid-19 times. Review of Income and Wealth, 68(2), 323-347.
- Flabbi, L., Macis, M., Moro, A., & Schivardi, F. (2019). Do female executives make a difference? The impact of female leadership on gender gaps and firm performance. The Economic Journal, 129(622), 2390-2423.
- Fleischer, D. (2022). Does gender diversity in supervisory boards affect gender diversity in management boards in Germany? An empirical analysis. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(1), 53-76.
- Fuegen, K., Biernat, M., Haines, E., & Deaux, K. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social issues, 60(4), 737-754.
- Gagliarducci, S., & Paserman, M. (2015). The effect of female leadership on establishment and employee outcomes: Evidence from linked employer-employee data. In Gender Convergence in the Labor Market (vol. 41, pp. 343-375). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Gomez, L., & Bernet, P. (2019). Diversity improves performance and outcomes. Journal of the National Medical Association, 111(4), 383-392.
- Heilman, M. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657-674.
- Henrekson, M., & Stenkula, M. (2009). Why are there so few female top executives in egalitarian welfare states? The Independent Review, 14(2), 239-270.
- Holst, E., & Kirsch, A. (2014). Women still the exception on executive boards of Germany’s large firms. DIW Economic Bulletin, 4(3), 3-15.
- Holst, E., & Wrohlich, K. (2017). Top decision-making bodies in large companies. DIW Economic Bulletin, 1/2, 3-15.
- Hong, J., & Kim, S.-I. (2022). Female executives and firm value: The moderating effect of co-CEO power gaps. Gender in Management, 37(7), 933-949.
- Hoobler, J., Masterson, C., Nkomo, S., & Michel, E. (2018). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique, and path forward. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2473-2499.
- Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. (2013). Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 822-839.
- Ibarra, H., Carter, N., & Silva, C. (2010). Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 80-85.
- Kirsch, A. (2017). Women’s access to boards in Germany – Regulation and symbolic change. In C. Seierstad, P. Gabaldon, & H. Mensi-Klarbach (Eds.), Gender Diversity in the Boardroom: Volume 1: The Use of Different Quota Regulations (pp. 205-232). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Kirsch, A., & Wrohlich, K. (2020). More women on supervisory boards: Increasing indications that the effect of the gender quota extends to executive boards. DIW Weekly Report, 4/5, 44-49.
- Kirsch, A., Sondergeld, V., & Wrohlich, K. (2022). Executive boards remain dominated by men, but change is finally coming. DIW Weekly Report, 12(3/4), 18-19.
- LSEG Data & Analytics. (2023). Environmental, social and governance scores from LSEG.
- Luu, T., Rowley, C., & Vo, T. (2019). Addressing employee diversity to foster their work engagement. Journal of Business Research, 95, 303-315.
- Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755-786.
- Nadeem, M., Bahadar, S., Gull, A., & Iqbal, U. (2020). Are women eco-friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3146-3161.
- Odenweller, K., & Rittenour, C. (2017). Stereotypes of stay-at-home and working mothers. Southern Communication Journal, 82(2), 57-72.
- O’Neill, O., & O’Reilly, C. (2010). Careers as tournaments: The impact of sex and gendered organizational culture preferences on MBAs’ income attainment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 856-876.
- Samtleben, C., & Müller, K.-U. (2022). Care and careers: Gender (in)equality in unpaid care, housework and employment. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 22, Article 100659.
- Schumann, F., Thun, T., Dauth, T., & Zülch, H. (2024). Does top management team diversity affect accounting quality? Empirical evidence from Germany. Journal of Management and Governance, 28, 137-175.
- Selvarajan, T., Slattery, J., & Stringer, D. (2015). Relationship between gender and work related attitudes: A study of temporary agency employees. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1919-1927.
- Shen, M., Tzioumis, E., Andersen, E., Wouk, K., McCall, R., Li, W., Girdler, S., & Malloy, E. (2022). Impact of mentoring on academic career success for women in medicine: A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 97(3), 444-458.
- Singh, S., & Vanka, S. (2020). Mentoring is essential but not sufficient: Sponsor women for leadership roles. Development and Learning in Organizations, 34(6), 25-28.
- Skała, D., & Weill, L. (2018). Does CEO gender matter for bank risk? Economic Systems, 42(1), 64-74.
- Sousa, M., & Santos, M. (2022). Gender diversity and equality in the boardroom: Quota implementation in Europe. In D. Crowther & S. Seifi (Eds.), The Equal Pillars of Sustainability (vol. 17, pp. 143-169). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Valentine, S., & Rittenburg, T. (2007). The ethical decision making of men and women executives in international business situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 125-134.
- Velte, P. (2016). Women on management board and ESG performance. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(1), 98-109.
- Zalata, A., Ntim, C., Aboud, A., & Gyapong, E. (2019). Female CEOs and core earnings quality: New evidence on the ethics versus risk-aversion puzzle. Journal of Business Ethics, 160, 515-534.
- Zulvina, D., & Adharianib, D. (2019). Executives’ gender and firm value. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 7(5), 266-279.