Financial fortitude: Indian pharmaceutical sector’s performance before and during COVID-19 using fuzzy AHP & TOPSIS
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(4).2024.27
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2024, Issue #4, pp. 333-348
- 73 Views
-
10 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the financial performance of various sectors across the globe, including the Indian pharmaceutical industry. This study aims to evaluate the financial performance of ten Indian pharmaceutical companies listed in the S&P BSE Healthcare Index over two distinct periods: before COVID-19 (2018–2020) and during the pandemic (2020–2022). A hybrid multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) approach, integrating the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), is employed to assess companies based on five key financial dimensions and several performance indicators. Results indicate that profitability, valuation, and growth ratios were the most critical dimensions, with weights of 0.21 each, followed by liquidity (0.19) and efficiency (0.18). Furthermore, among the companies evaluated, Divis Labs and Abbott India emerged as top performers, both during and before the pandemic, with Divis Labs registering closeness coefficients of 0.871 and 0.814 during 2020–2021 and 2021–2022. The findings highlight the financial resilience of these companies, offering valuable insights for stakeholders in formulating strategies to sustain financial stability during future crises.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C44, G11, G30
-
References58
-
Tables7
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. The hierarchical structure of the proposed model
- Figure 2. FAHP-TOPSIS ranking of the Indian pharmaceutical sector based on their financial efficiency before and during COVID-19
-
- Table 1. Decision criteria and list of sample companies
- Table 2. Fuzzy comparison matrix
- Table 3. Computed synthesized values, and normalized main criteria weights
- Table 4. Calculated sub-criteria weights
- Table 5. Total weighted values of primary criteria
- Table 6. Ranking of firms following calculated CCo values
- Table A1. List of investigated companies and their key characteristics
-
- Ak, B. K., Dechow, P. M., Sun, Y., & Wang, A. Y. (2013). The use of financial ratio models to help investors predict and interpret significant corporate events. Australian Journal of Management, 38(3), 553-98.
- Akhter, N. (2018). The impact of liquidity and profitability on operational efficiency of selected commercial banks in Bangladesh: A panel data study. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 18(A7), 13-24.
- Ali, A. (2022). Pre and post COVID-19 disparity of financial performance of oil and gas firms: An absolute and relational study. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(6), 396-403.
- Alimohammadlou, M., & Bonyani, A. (2017). A novel hybrid MCDM model for financial performance evaluation in Iran’s food industry. Accounting and Financial Control, 1(2), 38-45.
- Alsamhi, M. H., Al-Ofairi, F. A., Farhan, N. H., Al-Ahdal, W. M., & Siddiqui, A. (2022). Impact of Covid-19 on firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from India. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 1-16.
- Andriantiatsaholiniaina, L. A., Kouikoglou, V. S., & Phillis, Y. A. (2004). Evaluating strategies for sustainable development: fuzzy logic reasoning and sensitivity analysis. Ecological Economics, 48(2), 149-172.
- Anithabose, S., & Gnanaraj, G. (2023). Financial Performance of Indian Public Sector Banks Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic. Review of Professional Management: A Journal of Management, 1, 1-19.
- Anthony, P., Behnoee, B., Hassanpour, M., & Pamucar, D. (2019). Financial performance evaluation of seven Indian chemical companies. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(2), 81-99.
- Atayah, O. F., Dhiaf, M. M., Najaf, K., & Frederico, G. F. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 on financial performance of logistics firms: evidence from G-20 countries. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 15(2), 172-196.
- Banerjee, M., & Pal, S. K. (1996). Roughness of a fuzzy set. Information Sciences, 93(3-4), 235-246.
- Barnes, P. (1987). The analysis and use of financial ratios: A review article. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 14(4), 449-461.
- Başaran, S., & Haruna, Y. (2017). Integrating FAHP and TOPSIS to evaluate mobile learning applications for mathematics. Procedia Computer Science, 120, 91-98.
- Behera, C., & Rath, B. N. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and Indian pharmaceutical companies: An event study analysis. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 24, 1-4.
- Bhattacherjee, A., Kukreja, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2024). Stakeholders’ perspective towards employability: A hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 2157-2181.
- Bi, Z., Hameed, A., & Bi, S. (2023). Impact of the pandemic (COVID-19) on the financial performance of selected Indian telecommunication sector. The Scientific Temper, 14(03), 1024-1038.
- Bustani, B., Kurniaty, K., & Widyanti, R. (2021). The effect of earning per share, price to book value, dividend payout ratio, and net profit margin on the stock price in Indonesia stock exchange. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 1-8.
- Chang, D. Y. (1992). Extent analysis and synthetic decision. Optimization Techniques and Applications, 1(1), 352-355.
- Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.
- Ertuğrul, İ., & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2009). Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 702-715.
- Eyüboglu, K., & Çelik, P. (2016). Financial performance evaluation of Turkish energy companies with fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(3), 21-37.
- Fan, Y., Li, Z., & Yang, H. (2020). Study on Scheme Optimization of Urban Water Diversion Project based on Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS. In 2020 5th International Conference on Smart Grid and Electrical Automation (ICSGEA) 2020 (pp. 627-630).
- Gaisani, M. P., Fahmi, I., & Sasongko, H. (2021). The effect of Covid-19 on the financial performance of Indonesia’s livestock industry. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 18(3), 229-239.
- Ganguly, A., & Kumar, C. (2019). Evaluating supply chain resiliency strategies in the Indian pharmaceutical sector: A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) approach. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(2), 153-180.
- Gupta, N. (2020). Spotlight on Indian pharma’s resilience during pandemic times. Lupin Ltd.
- Halicka, K., & Gola, A. (2024). Gerontechnology ranking using the TOPSIS methods. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 16(1), 93-103.
- Hilkevics, S., & Semakina, V. (2019). The classification and comparison of business ratios analysis methods. Insights into Regional Development, 1(1), 47-56.
- Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (2012). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Ichsan, R., Suparmin, S., Yusuf, M., Ismal, R., & Sitompul, S. (2021). Determinant of sharia bank’s financial performance during the covid-19 pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(1), 298-309.
- Iltas, Y., Arslan, H., & Kayhan, T. (2017). The stock return predictability: comparing P/E and EV/Ebitda. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 4(3), 262-74.
- IndBiz. (2021). PLI scheme can generate pharma exports of over US$26 bn. Economic Diplomacy Division.
- Jana, S., Giri, B. C., Sarkar, A., Jana, C., Stević, Ž., & Radovanović, M. (2024). Application of Fuzzy AHP in Priority Based Selection of Financial Indices: A Perspective for Investors. ECONOMICS – Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 12(1), 1-27.
- Kabir, G., & Hasin, M. A. (2011). Comparative analysis of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for multicriteria inventory classification. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems, 1(1), 1-6.
- Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(2), 171-184.
- Keswani, S., & Dhingra, V. (2023). Relationship between COVID-19 and the Performance of Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 14(3), 433-444.
- Kumar, P., & Singh, R. K. (2012). A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(3), 287-303.
- Liu, Y., Eckert, C. M., & Earl, C. (2020). A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Systems with Applications, 161, 1-30.
- Modibbo, U. M., Hassan, M., Ahmed, A., & Ali, I. (2022). Multi-criteria decision analysis for pharmaceutical supplier selection problem using fuzzy TOPSIS. Management Decision, 60(3), 806-836.
- Moghimi, R., & Anvari, A. (2014). An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach and analysis to evaluate the financial performance of Iranian cement companies. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71(1), 685-698.
- Money Control. (2024). Financial Ratios.
- Mortazavi, S., & Seif Barghy, M. (2024). Retail Chain Stores Location using Integrated Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: Case Study Ofogh Kourosh Stores. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 14(1), 135-159.
- Nguyen, P. H., Tsai, J. F., Nguyen, V. T., Vu, D. D., & Dao, T. K. (2020). A decision support model for financial performance evaluation of listed companies in the Vietnamese retailing industry. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 1005-1015.
- Nikhil, E. V. S., Ram, V. S., Yadav, V. C., Kumar, K. K., & Nagaraju, D. (2017). Evaluation and Selection of Predicaments in Pharmaceutical Supply Chain using AHP under Fuzzy Environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 197(1), 012061. IOP Publishing.
- Otay, I., & Jaller, M. (2020). A novel pythagorean fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS method for the wind power farm location selection problem. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 39(5), 6193-6204.
- Pérez, J., Jimeno, J. L., & Mokotoff, E. (2006). Another potential shortcoming of AHP. Top, 14, 99-111.
- Russo, R. de F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: A systematic review of literature. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 1123-1132.
- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill. International, Translated to Russian, Portuguese, and Chinese, Revised editions, Paperback (1996, 2000), Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 2001.
- Safaei Ghadikolaei, A., Khalili Esbouei, S., & Antucheviciene, J. (2014). Applying fuzzy MCDM for financial performance evaluation of Iranian companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(2), 274-291.
- Seçme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroğlu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699-11709.
- Shaverdi, M., Heshmati, M. R., & Ramezani, I. (2014). Application of fuzzy AHP approach for financial performance evaluation of Iranian petrochemical sector. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 995-1004.
- Singh, M. K., & Neog, Y. (2020). Contagion effect of COVID-19 outbreak: Another recipe for disaster on the Indian economy. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(4), 1-8.
- Soleha, N., Mayuni, A., & Ismawati, I. (2022). Financial performance and financial distress before and during the covid-19 pandemic: Empirical Evidence from the Tourism and Hospitality Firms Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange. Management Science Research Journal, 1(3), 43-54.
- Soni, R., & Sharma, P. P. (2022). An investigative study to analyze the impact of covid-19 on key financial measures and operations of Indian consumer durable industry. Gap Gyan – A Global Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 70-77.
- Venkata Lakshmi Suneetha, M., & Aithal, P. S. (2024). A Financial Performance Analysis of Indian Oil Exploration & Drilling Sector. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 8(1), 147-169.
- Vinodh, S., Prasanna, M., & Prakash, N. H. (2014). Integrated Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS for selecting the best plastic recycling method: A case study. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(19-20), 4662-4672.
- Vishwakarma, V., Prakash, C., & Barua, M. K. (2016). A fuzzy-based multi criteria decision making approach for supply chain risk assessment in Indian pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 25(2), 245-265.
- Whitaker, R. (2007). Criticisms of the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Why they often make no sense. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8), 948-961.
- World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic overview.
- Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.