ESG vs conventional indices: Comparing efficiency in the Ukrainian stock market
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(2).2023.01
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2023, Issue #2, pp. 1-15
- Cited by
- 854 Views
-
279 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper explores market efficiency in the Ukrainian stock market to determine whether there are differences between traditional and ESG indices. Different data properties related to market efficiency are explored: persistence (R/S analysis is used for these purposes), stationarity (ADF tests), normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnoff, Anderson-Darling test, etc.), resistance to market anomalies (Day of the week effect, abnormal returns and patterns they generate are tested using parametrical and non-parametrical statistical tests), etc. Database includes daily data from 2 conventional Ukrainian stock market indices (UX and PFTS) and ESG index (WIG Ukraine) over the period 2015–2022. The following hypothesis is tested in this paper: ESG indices are more efficient than traditional ones. The findings suggest that there are no significant differences between traditional and ESG indices: they have the same persistence, stationarity, do not fit normal distribution and are not influenced by explored market anomalies. So, despite the fact that companies listed in the ESG index are more transparent and thus characterized by lower information asymmetry, they are more liquid and popular among investors, ESG index is not more efficient than traditional ones. This might be the result of unfair practices called “washing” aimed at signaling the active ESG involvement with actual absence of it. This means that many ESG companies are actually traditional. To prevent such practices, the ESG reporting regulation needs to be revised.
Acknowledgment
Alex Plastun gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (0121U100473).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C22, G12
-
References59
-
Tables10
-
Figures7
-
- Figure 1. Cluster analysis results for the research areas related to ESG, SRI, sustainability and conventional (traditional) indices in 2017–2022
- Figure 2. Dynamic R/S analysis results
- Figure 3. Average returns for the different days of the week
- Figure 4. Average returns on usual days and on the days after the days with abnormal returns
- Figure A1. Frequency of returns for the case of the PFTS index
- Figure A2. Frequency of returns for the case of the UX index
- Figure A3. Frequency of returns for the case of the WIG Ukraine index
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics for ESG and conventional indices (case of returns)
- Table 2. t-test results for ESG and conventional indices (case of returns)
- Table 3. ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test results for ESG and conventional indices (case of returns)
- Table 4. Normality tests for ESG and conventional indices (case of returns)
- Table 5. Stationarity tests for the ESG and conventional indices
- Table 6. Static R/S analysis results
- Table 7. Results of yield difference tests for different days of the week
- Table 8. Number of days with abnormal returns for ESG and conventional indices
- Table 9. Results of tests for differences in returns on days after days with abnormal returns and usual days
- Table 10. Emerging regulations in ESG investment landscape
-
- Abidin, S. Z., & Gan, C. (2017). Do socially responsible investments strategies significantly reduce diversification benefits? Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, MODSIM, 777-783.
- Arif, M., Hasan, M., Alawi, S. M., & Naeem, M. A. (2021). COVID-19 and time-frequency connectedness between green and conventional financial markets. Global Finance Journal, 49.
- Baroroh N., Yanto H., Khafid, M., Jati K., & Setyowati D. (2022). Determinant of earnings response coefficient on the Indonesian and Singaporean stock exchanges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(4), 132-145.
- Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., Dalò, A. & Herzel, S. (2015) Socially responsible and conventional investment funds: performance comparison and the global financial crisis. Applied Economics, 47(25), 2541-2562.
- Bloomberg Intelligence. (2022). ESG May Surpass $41 Trillion Assets in 2022, But Not Without Challenges, Finds Bloomberg Intelligence.
- Bouhlal, F., & Sedra, M. B. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on the topological properties of the Moroccan stock market network. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(2), 238-249.
- Caporale, G. M., Gil-Alana, L., Plastun, A., & Makarenko, I. (2022). Persistence in ESG and Conventional Stock Market Indices. Journal of Economics and Finance, 46, 678-703.
- Caporale, G. M., Gil-Alana, L., & Plastun, A. (2018). Short-term Price Overreactions: Identification, Testing, Exploitation. Computational Economics, 51(4), 913-940.
- Chen, L., Zhang, L., Huang, J., Xiao, H., & Zhou, Z. (2021). Social responsibility portfolio optimization incorporating ESG criteria. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6(1), 75-85.
- Chiappini, H., Vento, G., & De Palma, L. (2021). The impact of covid-19 lockdowns on sustainable indexes. Sustainability, 13(4), 1-18.
- Cortez, M., & Leite, P. (2015). Performance of European Socially Responsible Funds during Market Crises: Evidence from France. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 132-141.
- Cortez, M., Silva, F., & Areal, N. (2009) Socially Responsible Investing in the Global Market: The Performance of US and European Funds. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 17(3).
- Cunha, F. A. F. D. S., de Oliveira, E. M., Orsato, R. J., Klotzle, M. C., Cyrino Oliveira, F. L., & Caiado, R. G. G. (2020). Can sustainable investments outperform traditional benchmarks? evidence from global stock markets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 682-697.
- Durán-Santomil, P., Otero-González, L., Correia-Domingues, R. H., & Reboredo, J. C. Does Sustainability Score Impact Mutual Fund Performance? Sustainability, 11(10), 2972.
- EFRAG. (2022). Draft European Sustainability Reporting Standards.
- EU CSRD. (2021). Proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
- EU NFRD. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU – Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD).
- Gladish, B., Méndez-Rodríguez, P., Mzali, B., & Lang, P. (2013). Mutual Funds Efficiency Measurement under Financial and Social Responsibility Criteria. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.
- Gray, R. (2006). Does sustainability reporting improve corporate behaviour? Wrong question? Right time? Accounting and Business Research, 36(1), 65-88,
- Harabida, M., Radi, B., & Gueyie, J.-P. (2023). ESG Indices Efficiency in Five MENA Countries: Application of the Hurst Exponent. Theoretical Economics Letters, 13, 183-201.
- HKEX. (2020). Performance of ESG Equity IndicesVersus Traditional Equity Indices. Research Report.
- Hoepner, A. et al. (2019). Handbook of Climate Transition Benchmarks. Paris-Aligned Benchmark and Benchmarks’ ESG Disclosure European Commission.
- IOSCO. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Ratings and Data Providers. Final report.
- Jain, M., Sharma, G. D., & Srivastava, M. (2019). Can sustainable investment yield better financial returns: A comparative study of ESG indices and MSCI indices. Risks, 7(1).
- Kamath, A. N., Shenoy, S., & Kumar, N. S. (2022). An overview of investor sentiment: Identifying themes, trends, and future direction through bibliometric analysis. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(3), 229-242.
- Kurnoga, N., Simurina, N., & Fučkan, F. (2022). Performance Differences between ESG Indices and Conventional Market Indices: a Multivariate Analysis of Indices. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 25, 85-103.
- Leite, P., & Cortez, M. (2013). Style and Performance of International Socially Responsible Funds in Europe. Research in International Business and Finance.
- Managi, S., Okimoto, T., & Matsuda, A. (2012). Do socially responsible investment indexes outperform conventional indexes? Applied Financial Economics, 22(18), 1511-1527.
- MSCI. (2022). ESG and Climate Trends to Watch for 2023.
- Mynhardt, R. H., Plastun, A., & Makarenko, I. (2017) Market efficiency of traditional stock market indices and social responsible indices: the role of sustainability reporting. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(2), 94-106
- NBU. (2021). NBU Sustainable Finance Development Policy 2025.
- NIKKEI. (2020). Greenwashing-leaves-a-stain-the-world-must-not-tolerate.
- Nogueira, M. C., & Madaleno, M. (2022). Are sustainability indices infected by the volatility of stock indices? analysis before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(22) .
- Omura, A., Roca, E., & Nakai, M. (2021). Does responsible investing pay during economic downturns: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Finance Research Letters, 42.
- Plastun, A., Sibande, X., Gupta, R., & Wohar, M. E. (2021). Evolution of the price effects after one-day abnormal returns in the us stock market. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 57.
- Platform on Sustainable Finance. (2022a). Draft report on social taxonomy Draft Report by Subgroup 4: Social Taxonomy July 2021.
- Platform on Sustainable Finance. (2022b). Draft report on taxonomy extension options linked to environmental objectives.
- PRI. (2022). 88 new policies added to PRI’s regulation database.
- Rehman, R. U., Abidin, M. Z. U., Ali, R., Nor, S. M., Naseem, M. A., Hasan, M., & Ahmad, M. I. (2021). The integration of conventional equity indices with environmental, social, and governance indices: Evidence from emerging economies. Sustainability, 13(2), 1-27.
- Rehman, R. U., Zhang, J., Uppal, J., Cullinan, C., & Akram Naseem, M. (2016) Are environmental social governance equity indices a better choice for investors? an Asian perspective. Business Ethics, 25(4), 440-459.
- Rubbaniy, G., Khalid, A. A., Rizwan, M. F., & Ali, S. (2022). Are ESG stocks safe-haven during COVID-19? Studies in Economics and Finance, 39(2), 239-255.
- Salim, D. F., Iradianty, A., Kristanti, F., & Candraningtias, W. (2022). Smart beta portfolio investment strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(3), 302-311.
- Schröder, M. (2004) The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: Investment Funds and Indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18, 122-142.
- Sharma, G. D., Sarker, T., Rao, A., Talan, G., & Jain, M. (2022). Revisting conventional and green finance spillover in post-COVID world: Evidence from robust econometric models. Global Finance Journal, 51.
- Sharma, G. D., Talan, G., Bansal, S., & Jain, M. (2021a). Is there a cost for sustainable investments: Evidence from dynamic conditional correlation. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment.
- Sharma, G. D., Tiwari, A. K., Talan, G., & Jain, M. (2021, b). Revisiting the sustainable versus conventional investment dilemma in COVID-19 times. Energy Policy, 156.
- Statman, M. (2000). Socially Responsible Mutual Funds (corrected). Financial Analysts Journal, 563, 30-39.
- Suresha, B., Srinidhi, V. R., Dippi Verma, Manu, K. S., & Krishna, T. A. (2022). The impact of ESG inclusion on price, liquidity and financial performance of Indian stocks: Evidence from stocks listed in BSE and NSE ESG indices. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(4), 40-50.
- Takaishi, T. (2022). Time Evolution of Market Efficiency and Multifractality of the Japanese Stock Market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15, Article 31.
- The National Council for the Recovery of Ukraine from the Consequences of War. (2022). Ukraine Recovery Plan: Financial System Functioning, Reform and Development.
- Ukraine Recovery Conference. (2022). Recovery Plan.
- Umar, Z., Kenourgios, D., & Papathanasiou, S. (2020) The static and dynamic connectedness of environmental, social, and governance investments: International evidence. Economic Modelling, 93, 112-124.
- UNCTAD. (2022). Closing investment gap in global goals key to building better future.
- Vadithala, U. K., & Tadoori, G. (2021). Market Efficiency of ESG and Traditional Indices - Pre and Post COVID Analysis of NSE Indices. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 9(3), 2712-2726.
- Varma, A., & Nofsinger, J. (2014). Socially Responsible Funds and Market Crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 180-193.
- Velte P. (2020). Institutional ownership, environmental, social, and governance performance and disclosure – a review on empirical quantitative research. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 282-305.
- Verbraucherzentrale. (2022). Greenwashing bei der Geldanlage: Werbung mit Nachhaltigkeit. (In German).
- Yu, E., Pei-yi, L. B. V., & Chen, C. H. (2020) Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52 (101192).
- Zulfikar, Z. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of stock market performance throughout the COVID-19 outbreak. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(2), 14-23.