Enhancing portfolio resilience during crisis periods: Lessons from BRICS indices and multi asset strategies

  • 279 Views
  • 87 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This paper uses Markowitz’s mean-variance model to construct an investment portfolio incorporating multiple assets – BRICS equity indices, Gold, crude oil, bonds, and cryptocurrencies. The optimally created risky portfolios outperform alternative portfolio optimization methods – the naive portfolio and the equal risk contribution portfolio; and established indices – the S&P 500 and the MSCI Emerging Equity Index in terms of metrics – adjusted Sharpe ratio, modified Sharpe ratio, and the modified Value at Risk. The findings are validated across different periods, including the COVID-19 period and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, including various in and out of sample periods. The findings highlight the benefits of portfolio diversity, mainly using BRICS indices, Gold, and Brent Crude oil, and challenge the notion of limited diversification benefits in BRICS indices found in previous studies. This paper further suggests the potential of emerging market bonds ETF as a diversification option during turbulent economic periods and highlights the limitations of cryptocurrencies in optimizing multi asset portfolios. By adopting the recommended multi asset portfolios, investors can enhance their risk-return trade-offs and achieve superior performance compared to the S&P500 and MSCI emerging indices. Lastly, the paper recommends future research opportunities in measuring portfolio performance and hedging strategies considering risk-adjusted return measurements, transaction expenses, and dynamic rebalancing techniques.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Variables used in the study
    • Table 2. Test of normality using Jarque-Bera test results: Period: 3/1/2018 to 14/6/2018
    • Table 3. Extract of descriptive statistics
    • Table 4. Yield of 10-year U.S. Treasury bond
    • Table 5. Recommended optimal risky portfolios
    • Table 6. Recommended equal risk contribution portfolios
    • Table 7. Portfolio evaluation as per Adjusted Sharpe Ratio
    • Table 8. Portfolio evaluation as per Modified Sharpe Ratio
    • Table 9. Portfolio evaluation as expected shortfall using modified Value at Risk (MVaR)
    • Conceptualization
      Nupur Gupta, Pradip Mitra, Bharath Supra
    • Data curation
      Nupur Gupta
    • Formal Analysis
      Nupur Gupta, Pradip Mitra
    • Investigation
      Nupur Gupta, Pradip Mitra
    • Methodology
      Nupur Gupta, Pradip Mitra
    • Project administration
      Nupur Gupta
    • Supervision
      Nupur Gupta
    • Validation
      Nupur Gupta
    • Writing – original draft
      Nupur Gupta, Pradip Mitra
    • Writing – review & editing
      Nupur Gupta, Bharath Supra
    • Visualization
      Pradip Mitra, Bharath Supra
    • Resources
      Bharath Supra
    • Software
      Bharath Supra
Related Articles

  • An evaluation and comparison of Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall

    Tom Burdorf , Gary van VuurenORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.02
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018         Issue #4         pp. 17-34 Views: 1244 Downloads: 254 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    As a risk measure, Value at Risk (VaR) is neither sub-additive nor coherent. These drawbacks have coerced regulatory authorities to introduce and mandate Expected Shortfall (ES) as a mainstream regulatory risk management metric. VaR is, however, still needed to estimate the tail conditional expectation (the ES): the average of losses that are greater than the VaR at a significance level These two risk measures behave quite differently during growth and recession periods in developed and emerging economies. Using equity portfolios assembled from securities of the banking and retail sectors in the UK and South Africa, historical, variance-covariance and Monte Carlo approaches are used to determine VaR (and hence ES). The results are back-tested and compared, and normality assumptions are tested. Key findings are that the results of the variance covariance and the Monte Carlo approach are more consistent in all environments in comparison to the historical outcomes regardless of the equity portfolio regarded. The industries and periods analysed influenced the accuracy of the risk measures; the different economies did not.

  • Modeling tail risk in Indian commodity markets using conditional EVT-VaR and their relation to the stock market

    Shalini AgnihotriORCID , Kanishk ChauhanORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.19(3).2022.01
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 19, 2022         Issue #3         pp. 1-12 Views: 538 Downloads: 183 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Investment in commodity markets in India accelerated after 2007; this was accompanied by large price variability, hence, it becomes imperative to measure commodity price risk precisely. It becomes equally important to study the relationship between commodity price variability and the stock market. Hence, this study aims to calculate the tail risk of highly traded Indian commodity futures returns using the conditional EVT-VaR method for risk measurement. Secondly, the linkage between commodity markets and the stock market is also studied using the Delta CoVaR method. Results highlight the following points. There is risk transfer from the extreme increase/decrease in crude oil futures returns to the Nifty Index returns. Both extreme price increase or decrease of crude oil futures driven either by financial or a combination of financial and economic shocks affect the stock market. Zinc and Natural gas futures are not linked to the stock market, which means they can be useful in portfolio diversification. The findings suggest that, in Indian commodity markets, EVT-VaR is a useful tool for measuring risk. Only Crude oil futures shocks affect the stock market, and extreme integration between them becomes more prominent when oil shocks are driven by financial factors. Commodities other than Crude oil are not integrated with stock markets in India.

Download Preview
Close
Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Investment Management and Financial Innovations