Energy-efficient house: economic, ecological and social justification in Ukrainian conditions
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(4).2017.07
-
Article InfoVolume 8 2017, Issue #4, pp. 53-61
- Cited by
- 766 Views
-
215 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The main goal of the article is the efficiency justification of energy-efficient house (EEH) from the different points of view: economic, ecological and social. In this case, the EEH under the green economy context was considered by the authors. In addition, according to the Ukrainian ongoing condition, the key preconditions of EEH implementation among the Ukrainian households were allocated. Besides, the main approaches to define EEH are analyzed and systematized by the authors. On this basis, the main bullet points and features of EEH were indicated. The authors determined the EEH opportunities for spreading among the Ukrainian households. It should be noted, that the lack of awareness among the civil society provokes the slow temp of the EEH enlarging in Ukraine. At the same time, the European experience showed that the huge part of their households can be characterized as energy-effective. With the purpose of understand the efficiency of EEH, the authors had estimated the economic benefits of installed solar collector in the household as one of the parts of EEH. According to the results, the authors allocate the restraining factors of the EEH spreading in Ukraine. Thus, the great payback period is one of them. In addition, the high level of the currency rate has negative impact on the payback period. From the other side the continuously increasing of the utility bills have been indicated as a negative stimulate factor. In order to increase the awareness of the EEH benefits under the Ukrainian civil society, the main economic, ecological and social benefits of EEH were systematized by the authors.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q28, Q48, Q50
-
References22
-
Tables5
-
Figures4
-
- Fig. 1. The dynamic of shares of world consumption of the primary energy, 1997-2016
- Fig.2. The dynamic of income and expenses to utilities of Ukrainians
- Fig. 3. The part of utility payments in income of EU countries in 2017
- Fig. 4. The dynamic of the number of private households where the solar station is installed
-
- Table 1. The systematization of the main approach to define the EEH
- Table 2. Initial data for calculation
- Table 3. Summary of the data consumption and the electricity generation, solar installation 12 and 24 kWh at consumption of 450 and 600 kWh (own calculation)
- Table 4. The summary data of annual savings depending on installation power and level of consumption of electricity by consumer, UAH
- Table 5. The main features of EEH in the context of “green” economy
-
- Antonenko, L., Rabia, A. Abdullah. (2010). State regulation of innovation development alternative energy in Ukraine. Economics and Management Problems, 683, 13-17.
- Cost of Living. (2017). NUMBEO.
- Dynamic of income and expenses to utilities of Ukrainians. State Statistics Service of Ukraine.
- Fedosenko, N. (2017). Ukrainians have already installed 2323 solar power stations. Eco Town.
- Global Energy Statistical Yearbook (2017).
- Green tariff, implementation of projects for individuals and legal entities. Earnings in alternative energy. (2017).
- How much do Ukrainians earn: how were average salaries and prices growing in Ukraine? (2017).
- Ishchenko, A. (2017). Stimulation of Effective Ecological and Economic Interactions in the Process of Business Environment Creation. Environmental Economics, 8(2), 57-66.
- Jaunius Jatautas and Egidijus Kasiulis. (2016). The effect of legislation on hydropower development: case study of Lithuania. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(2-2).
- Klimchuk, M. (2015). Theoretical applicable concepts of energy efficient construction: economic aspects. The ways of increasing the construction efficient in conditions of market relations, 33, 69-79.
- Passive House requirements. The independent institute for outstanding energy efficiency in buildings.
- Pimonenko, T. (2016). Net-Zero House: Perspectives and Opportunities in Ukraine. In Riga Technical University 57th International Scientific Conference “Scientific Conference on Economics and Entrepreneurship” (SCEE’2016), Proceedings (pp. 208-210).
- Pimonenko, T., Lyulyov, O. V., & Us, Y. (2016). Feed-in tariff like an incentive instrument to enlarge renewable energy using by households, 78-81.
- Pimonenko, T., Prokopenko, O., & Dado, J. (2017). Net Zero House: EU Experience in Ukrainian Conditions. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics™, 38(4), 46-57.
- Renewable energy. State Statistics Service of Ukraine.
- Sainitskiy, M., Poznyak, A., Maroyak, V. (2005). Problems of Energy Saving in Modern Housing and Civil Engineering. Interdepartmental Scientific and Technical Collection “Building Constructions”, 63, 234-239.
- Stepanenko, O., Dubrovska, V. (2014). Passive House – the Path to Energy Efficiency. Energy: economics, technology, ecology, 3, 56-58.
- Ntodeni, S., & Edoun, E. I. (2017). Innovation through the effects of solar water heating (SWH) in Africa. Environmental Economics, 8(3), 119-126.
- The National Commission on the regulation of the energy sector and utilities. (2016).
- Type of energy Efficient House. (2016). Eco Town.
- US Department of Energy. (2015). A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings. Energy Efficiency and Renewable.
- Yakovleva, N. (2016). What are the types of energy efficient homes. Ecotown.