Effectiveness of reforms to eliminate obstacles in the development of sustainable energy in different countries of the world
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.01
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #3, pp. 1-13
- Cited by
- 234 Views
-
46 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The development of strategy and tactics for reforms in the energy industry involves the identification of benchmark countries whose experience can form the basis of a quantitative assessment of the main targets of the reforms. The basis for such decisions can be the results of the integrated assessment of energy reforms in the EU countries for 2010–2021. This study aims to cluster these countries according to the integral indicator and determine specific directions in which the respective country needs to make progress in moving to another cluster. Thus, based on a linear model, the Fishburn formula, and variance analysis, 10 energy development indicators were combined into a single indicator that characterizes the effectiveness of energy reforms (for example, in 2021, it was the highest in Austria (0.612), Germany (0.644), and France (0.620); the lowest – in Latvia (0.383) and Croatia (0.369)). Based on this indicator, countries were clustered using the k-means method. Four clusters were formed: representatives of the highest first (Austria, Germany, France, Spain, Sweden, and Luxembourg) are strategic benchmarks for all EU countries, and representatives of other clusters are tactical benchmarks for countries from lower clusters. The average values of all 10 indicators of energy development were calculated. Their low values are a sign that this direction should be a priority when carrying out reforms, and their quantitative estimates can be used as specific targets when setting strategic and tactical tasks (transition to a higher cluster or achieving average values in one’s cluster).
Acknowledgment
The research was funded by a Fellowship agreement for a research fellowship in the framework of the 11th funding round within the Philipp Schwartz Initiative of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q48, Q42, P28, Q51
-
References68
-
Tables3
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Cluster distribution
- Figure 2. Plot of means for each cluster
- Figure 3. Two-Way joining results
-
- Table 1. Weighting coefficients for the assessment of the effectiveness of reforms to eliminate obstacles in the development of sustainable energy
- Table 2. Clusters of countries according to the reform effectiveness rank
- Table 3. Cluster means
-
- Alyamani, T., Damgacioglu, H., Celik, N., Asfour, S., & Feiock, R. (2016). A multiple perspective modeling and simulation approach for renewable energy policy evaluation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 102, 280-293.
- Artyukhova, N., Tiutiunyk, I., Bogacki, S., Wołowiec, T., Dluhopolskyi, O., & Kovalenko, Y. (2022). Scenario modeling of energy policies for sustainable development. Energies, 15(20), Article 7711.
- Bhandari, M. P. (2023). The fundamental principles of social sciences. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(2), 73-86.
- Bilan, Y., Srovnalíková, P., Streimikis, J., Lyeonov, S., Tiutiunyk, I., & Humenna, Y. (2020). From shadow economy to lower carbon intensity: Theory and evidence. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 19(1-3), 196-216.
- Bozhenko, V., Buriak, A., Bozhenko, A., & Roienko, O. (2023). Transparency and corruption prevention in financing climate action. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(2), 88-94.
- Chygryn, O., & Shevchenko, K. (2023). Energy industry development: Key trends and the core determinants. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(1), 115-128.
- Chygryn, O., Bektas, C., & Havrylenko, O. (2023). Innovation and management of smart transformation global energy sector: Systematic literature review. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 105-112.
- Didenko, I., Volik, K., Vasylieva, T., Lyeonov, S., & Antoniuk, N. (2020). Migration, environment, and country safety: Analysis of touchpoints. E3S Web of Conferences, 202, Article 03028.
- Didenko, I., Volik, K., Vasylieva, T., Lyeonov, S., & Antoniuk, N. (2021). Environmental migration and country security: Theoretical analysis and empirical research. E3S Web of Conferences, 234, Article 00010.
- Haile, Y., & Min, H. (2023). Success factors for renewable energy businesses in emerging economies. Management Research Review, 46(8), 1091-1111.
- Henriques, J., & Catarino, J. (2016). Motivating towards energy efficiency in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 42-50.
- Hilorme, T., Sokolova, L., Portna, O., Lysiak, L., & Boretskaya, N. (2019). The model of evaluation of the renewable energy resources development under conditions of efficient energy consumption. 33rd IBIMA Conference. Granada, Spain.
- Hu, Y., Huang, W., Wang, J., Chen, S., & Zhang, J. (2016). Current status, challenges, and perspectives of Sichuan’s renewable energy development in Southwest China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 1373-1385.
- Jonek-Kowalska, I. (2022). Multi-criteria evaluation of the effectiveness of energy policy in Central and Eastern European countries in a long-term perspective. Energy Strategy Reviews, 44, Article 100973.
- Juarez-Rojas, L., Alvarez-Risco, A., Campos-Dávalos, N., de las Mercedes Anderson-Seminario, M., & Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S. (2023). Effectiveness of renewable energy policies in promoting green entrepreneurship: A global benchmark comparison. In A. Alvarez-Risco, S. S. Muthu, & S. Del-Aguila-Arcentales (Eds.), Footprint and Entrepreneurship. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes (pp. 47-87). Springer, Singapore.
- Kaime, T., & Glicksman, R. (2015). An international legal framework for SE4All: Human rights and sustainable development law imperatives. Fordham International Law Journal, 38, 1405-1444.
- Karim, M. E., Munir, A. B., Karim, M. A., Muhammad-Sukki, F., Abu-Bakar, S. H., Sellami, N., Bani, N. A., & Hassan, M. Z. (2018). Energy revolution for our common future: An evaluation of the emerging international renewable energy law. Energies, 11(7), Article 1769.
- Klymenko, N., & Nehrey, M. (2022). Electricity tariff structures modeling for reengineering Ukrainian energy sector. In Z. Hu, Q. Zhang, S. Petoukhov, & M. He (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Systems for Logistics Engineering (pp. 493-502). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Krause, J. (2023). Towards Resilient Engineering Business With Five Steps: Implementation of Holistic Sustainability and Circular Economy Strategies Into Business Activities. In Y. Ramakrishna & S. Wahab (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Designing Sustainable Supply Chains to Achieve a Circular Economy (pp. 449-468). IGI Global.
- Kuzior, A., Lobanova, A., & Kalashnikova, L. (2021). Green energy in Ukraine: State, public demands, and trends. Energies, 14(22), Article 7745.
- Kuzior, A., Sira, M., & Brozek, P. (2022b). Using blockchain and artificial intelligence in energy management as a tool to achieve energy efficiency. Virtual Economics, 5(3), 69-90.
- Kuzior, A., Vyshnevskyi, O., & Trushkina, N. (2022a). Assessment of the impact of digitalization on greenhouse gas emissions on the example of EU member states. Production Engineering Archives, 28(4), 407-419.
- Kwilinski, A., Dobrovolska, O., Wołowiec, T., Cwynar, W., Didenko, I., Artyukhov, A., & Dluhopolskyi, O. (2024). Carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane: What types of greenhouse gases are most affected by green investments and renewable energy development? Energies, 17(4), Article 804.
- Kyshakevych, B., Melnyk, O., Hrytsenko, K., Voronchak, I., & Nastoshyn, S. (2024). Analysis of cointegration and causality between indicators of economic growth and energy efficiency of European countries. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(54), 316-330.
- Lee, S., Kim, Y., & Chong, W. K. (2015). A statistical analysis of effectiveness of energy policy in the United States: Incentives vs. regulations. Procedia Engineering, 118, 1282-1287.
- Letunovska, N., Saher, L., Vasylieva, T., & Lieonov, S. (2021). Dependence of public health on energy consumption: A cross-regional analysis. E3S Web of Conferences, 250, Article 04014.
- Lin, B., Omoju, O. E., & Okonkwo, J. U. (2016). Factors influencing renewable electricity consumption in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 687-696.
- Lyeonov, S., Pimonenko, T., Chygryn, O., Reznik, O., & Gaynulina, R. (2021). Green brand as a marketing instrument: Principle, features and parameters. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 43(2-3), 147-165.
- Malinauskaite, J., Jouhara, H., Ahmad, L., Milani, M., Montorsi, L., & Venturelli, M. (2019). Energy efficiency in industry: EU and national policies in Italy and the UK. Energy, 172, 255-269.
- Márquez-Sobrino, P., Díaz-Cuevas, P., Pérez-Pérez, B., & GálvezRuiz, D. (2023). Twenty years of energy policy in Europe: Achievement of targets and lessons for the future. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 25, 2511-2527.
- Matvieieva, Yu., & Hamida, H. B. (2022). Modelling and forecasting energy efficiency impact on the human health. Health Economics and Management Review, 3(2), 78-85.
- Matvieieva, Yu., Sulym, V., Rosokhata, A., & Jasnikowski, A. (2023). Influence of waste incineration and obtaining energy from it to the public health for certain territories: A bibliometric and substantive study. Health Economics and Management Review, 4(1), 71-80.
- Melnyk, L. (2013). Analysis of energy-entropy preconditions for progressive development of economic systems. Actual Problems of Economics, 148(10), 15-22.
- Melnyk, L. G. (2016). Instruments and key factors of sustainable (“green”) economy formation. Actual Problems of Economics, 178(4), 30-36.
- Mills, E. (2011). Building commissioning: A golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Energy Efficiency, 4, 145-173.
- Mushafiq, M., Arisar, M.M.K., Tariq, H., & Czapp, S. (2023). Energy efficiency and economic policy: Comprehensive theoretical, empirical, and policy review. Energies, 16(5), Article 2381.
- Naseer, M., Bagh, T., & Iftikhar, K. (2023). Firm’s climate change risk and firm value: An empirical analysis of the energy industry. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(2), 1-11.
- Nikolaev, A., & Konidari, P. (2017). Development and assessment of renewable energy policy scenarios by 2030 for Bulgaria. Renewable Energy, 111, 792-802.
- Njegovanović, A. (2023). Financial evolution and interdisciplinary research. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(1), 71-95.
- Oe, H., & Yamaoka, Y. (2023). The impact of the digital environment on eco-friendly behavioural change towards nature: Exploring the concept of forest bathing without forest. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(3), 76-93.
- Oe, H., Yamaoka, Y., & Duda, K. (2022). How to sustain businesses in the post-COVID-19 era: A focus on innovation, sustainability and leadership. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(4), 1-9.
- Oe, H., Yamaoka, Y., & Sartamorn, S. (2023). Research on residents’ intention to settle and the mediating effect of green policy leadership. Health Economics and Management Review, 4(4), 48-57.
- Ortiz, D., & Vítor, L. (2020). Energy policy concerns, objectives and indicators: A review towards a framework for effectiveness assessment. Energies, 13(24), Article 6533.
- Pashkuda, M., Blakyta, H., Barabash, N., Pashkuda, T., & Vavdiichyk, I. (2022). Price formation criteria for electricity supply companies in the conditions of market liberalization. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 5(46), 161-170.
- Patel, S., Kasztelnik, K., & Zelihic, M. (2023). Global overview of modern financing typologies to mitigate financial risks in developed countries. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(2), 54-66.
- Pimonenko, T., Lyulyov, O., Samusevych, I., & Us, Y. (2022). National energy security: Financial determinants. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(43), 259-270.
- Reuter, M., Patel, M. K., Eichhammer, W., Lapillonne, B., & Pollier, K. (2020). A comprehensive indicator set for measuring multiple benefits of energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 139, Article 111284.
- Shwom, R., & Lorenzen, J. (2012). Changing household consumption to address climate change: Social scientific insights and challenges. WIREs Climate Change, 3(5), 379-395.
- Singh, S. N., & Pandey, A. (2023). Accomplishing sustainable development goals in India: A systematic literature review. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(2), 80-87.
- Skowron, Ł., Chygryn, O., Gąsior, M., Koibichuk, V., Lyeonov, S., Drozd, S., & Dluhopolskyi, O. (2023). Interconnection between the dynamic of growing renewable energy production and the level of CO2 emissions: A multistage approach for modeling. Sustainability, 15(12), Article 9473.
- Skrynnyk, O. (2023). Prediction of convergent and divergent determinants of organisational development. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 74-81.
- Song, D., Liu, Y., Qin, T., Gu, H., Cao, Y., & Shi, H. (2022). Overview of the policy instruments for renewable energy development in China. Energies, 15(18), Article 6513.
- Sotnyk, I., Kurbatova, T., Blumberga, A., Kubatko, O., & Kubatko, O. (2022). Solar energy development in households: Ways to improve state policy in Ukraine and Latvia. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 41(11), 1623-1649.
- Sotnyk, I., Kurbatova, T., Blumberga, A., Kubatko, O., & Prokopenko, O. (2023). Solar business prosumers in Ukraine: Should we wait for them to appear? Energy Policy, 178, Article 113585.
- Sotnyk, I., Kurbatova, T., Kubatko, O., Baranchenko, Y., & Li, R. (2021). The price for sustainable development of renewable energy sector: The case of Ukraine. E3S Web of Conferences, 280, Article 02006.
- Tu, Q., & Mo, J. L. (2017). Coordinating carbon pricing policy and renewable energy policy with a case study in China. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 294-304.
- Tymoshenko, M., Saienko, V., Serbov, M., Shashyna, M., & Slavkova, O. (2023). The impact of industry 4.0 on modelling energy scenarios of the developing economies. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(48), 336-350.
- Vakulenko, I., Saher, L., & Shymoshenko, A. (2023). Systematic literature review of сarbon-neutral economy concept. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(1), 139-148.
- Vostrykov, P., & Jura, A. (2022). Environmental taxes impact for the population health protection: Cross-country analysis. Health Economics and Management Review, 3(4), 35-45.
- Wang, W., Melnyk, L., Kubatko, O., Kovalov, B., & Hens, L. (2023). Economic and technological efficiency of renewable energy technologies implementation. Sustainability, 15(11), Article 8802.
- Worrell, E., Bernstein, L., Roy, J., Price, L., & Harnisch, J. (2009). Industrial energy efficiency and climate change mitigation. Energy Efficiency, 2, 109-123.
- Yang, C., & Masron, T. A. (2022). Impact of digital finance on energy efficiency in the context of green sustainable development. Sustainability, 14(18), Article 11250.
- Youcef, A. (2023). The effect of job satisfaction on work accidents: Empirical study in Algerian electricity and gas company − Hassi Messaoud. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(4), 1-13.
- Zhang, L., Huang, F., Lu, L., Ni, X., & Iqbal, S. (2022). Energy financing for energy retrofit in COVID-19: Recommendations for green bond financing. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 23105-23116.
- Zhu, T., Curtis, J., & Clancy, M. (2023). Modelling barriers to low-carbon technologies in energy system analysis: The example of renewable heat in Ireland. Applied Energy, 330, Article 120314.
- Ziabina, Y., & Acheampong, S. (2023). Financial component of the waste management system. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(2), 46-55.
- Ziabina, Y., Iskakov, & Senyah, M. M. (2023a). Waste management system: Key determinants of green development and energy balance transformation. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(2), 161-172.
- Ziabina, Y., Khomenko, L., & Osei Owusu, E. K. (2023b). Analysis of accidental transmission impacts in the chain “waste management system – public health”. Health Economics and Management Review, 4(2), 74-82.