A review on household energy consumption behavior: how about migrated consumers?
-
Author(s)Ebru AcunerLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0877-6009
,
M. Özgür KayalicaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9828-7385
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.09(4).2018.02
-
Article InfoVolume 9 2018, Issue #4, pp. 8-21
- Cited by
- 2449 Views
-
826 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper reviews the literature on energy consumption behavior for both domestic and migrated/displaced population and aims to recommend crucial policy measures for creating awareness on the energy efficiency. Consumers’ adoption to the efficient usage of energy varies depending on demographic, behavioral and situational dynamics in their households and societies. The regional or national strategies to implement efficient technologies for the consumer engagement are crucial to change their behaviors. Migrants affect the energy usage patterns in the host country due to their different usage behaviors. Any type of measures for migrated population should include available, acceptable, accessible and affordable energy efficiency applications to engage them with the domestic population.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)R23, R28, R29
-
References50
-
Tables4
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Demonstration of a hierarchical model on values, beliefs, attitudes and behavior
- Figure 2. The relation between life choices and energy consumption
- Figure 3. Factors affecting consumer behaviors
- Figure 4. Major intervention strategies
-
- Table 1. Summary of projects on surveying energy consumer behaviors
- Table 2. Overview of the studies concerning social/economic, households and factors on the energy consumption
- Table 3. Summary of findings from European surveys and projects on feedback intervention
- Table 4. Summary of energy consumption behaviors studies concerning migrated/displaced people
-
- Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273-291.
- Advanced FP7 Project (2015). The voice of consumer.
- Al-mulali, U. (2016). Exploring the bi-directional long run relationship between energy consumption and life quality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 824-837.
- Bale, C. S. E., Varga, L., & Foxon, T. J. (2015). Energy and complexity: New ways forward. Applied Energy, 138, 150-159.
- CARI, Argentine Council for International Relations (2018). Economic Migration and the Role of Cities – Ensuring Social Cohesion. Buenos Aires.
- DeCicco, J., Yan, T., Keusch, F., Munoz D., & Neidert, L. (2015). U.S. consumer attitudes and expectations about energy. Energy Policy, 86, 749-758.
- Dillman, D. A., Eugene, A. R., & Dillman, J. J. (1983). Life style and home energy conservation in the United States: the poor accept life style cutbacks while the wealthy invest in conservation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(3-4), 299- 315.
- E-Balance FP7 Project (2017). Balancing energy production and consumption in energy efficient smart neighbourhoods.
- Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
- EIA, Energy Information Administration (2017). International Energy Outlook 2017.
- Ellegård, K., & Palm, J. (2011). Visualizing energy consumption activities as a tool for making everyday life more sustainable. Applied Energy, 88(5), 1920-1926.
- Fuguitt, G., Heberlein, T. A., & Rathbun, P. R. (1991). Migration consequences for household energy consumption in a nonmetropolitan recreation-retirement area. Rural Sociology, 56(1), 56-69.
- Han, Q., Nieuwenhijsen, I., de Vries, B., Blokhuis, E., & Schaefer, W. (2013). Intervention strategy to stimulate energy-saving behaviour of local residents. Energy Policy, 52, 706-715.
- Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. (2013). Keeping energy visible? exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term. Energy Policy, 52, 126-134.
- Hast, A., Alimohammad, B., & Syri, S. (2015). Consumer attitudes towards renewable energy in China – The case of Shanghai. Sustainable Cities and Society, 17, 69-79.
- Hirst, E., & Goeltz, R. (1982). Residential energy conservation actions: analysis of disaggregated data. Energy Systems and Policy, 6, 135-150.
- Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: a review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 525-531.
- IEA, International Energy Agency (2011). The IEA Model of Short-term Energy Security (MOSES).
- IEA, International Energy Agency (2017). Key World Energy Statistics.
- INSIGHT_E (2015). Energy poverty and vulnerable consumers in the energy sector across the EU: analysis of policies and measures.
- IOM, International Organization for Migration (2018). World Migration Report.
- Jones, R. V., Fuertes, A., & Lomas, K. J. (2015). The socio-economic, dwelling and appliance related factors affecting electricity consumption in domestic buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 901-917.
- Karlin, B., Zinger, J. F., & Ford, R. (2015). The effects of feedback on energy Conservation: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1205-1227.
- Kolk, A. (2012). The role of consumers in EU energy policy. Carbon Management, 3(2), 175- 183.
- Komatsu, S., Ha, H. D., & Kaneko, S. (2013). The effects of internal migration on residential energy consumption and CO2 emissions: A case study in Hanoi. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17(6), 572-580.
- Lehne, J., Blyth, W., Bazilian, M., & Grafham, O. (2016). Energy services for refugees and displaced people. Energy Strategy Reviews, 13-14, 134-146.
- Lucas, K., Brooks, M., Darnton, A., & Jones, J. (2008). Promoting pro-environmental behaviour: existing evidence and policy implications. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(5), 456-466.
- Lutzenhiser, L. (1992). A cultural model of the household energy consumption. Energy, 17(1), 47-60.
- Mengolini, A. M. (2017). Prosumer behaviour in emerging electricity systems. Politecnico di Torino.
- Micklitz, H. W., & Reisch, L. (2011). An Introduction to the special issue on behavioural economics, consumer policy and consumer law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34(3), 271-276.
- Muye, R., Shu, T., Kirk, S., Guofeng, S., Huizhong S., Ye, H., Han, C., Yilin, C., Xi, C., Junfeng, L., Bengang, L., Xilong, W., & Canfei, H. (2015). Direct energy consumption associated emissions by rural-to-urban migrants in Beijing. Environmental Science and Technology, 49(22), 13708- 13715.
- OECD, The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002). Decision-making and Environmental Policy Design for Consumer Durables.
- Ofgem (2016). Retail Energy Markets in 2016.
- Olsen, M. (1983). Public acceptance of consumer energy conservation strategies. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4(1-2), 183- 196.
- Pothitou, M., Athanasios, J. K., Varga, L., & Gu, S. (2014). A framework for targeting household energy savings through habitual behavioural change. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 35(7), 686-700.
- Pothitou, M., Hanna, R. F., & Chalvatzis, K. J. (2016). Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: an empirical study. Applied Energy, 184, 1217-1229.
- Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
- Primmer, J. (2018). Belief. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab.
- Sardianou, E. (2007). Estimating energy conservation patterns of Greek households. Energy Policy, 35(7), 3778-3791.
- Schleich, J., & Mills, B. (2008). Determinants for the take-up of energy-efficient household appliances in Germany (Draft Working Paper). Karlsruhe.
- Scott, S. (1997). Household energy efficiency in Ireland: a replication study of owner of energy saving items. Energy Economics, 19(2), 187-208.
- Shrestha, S., Ram, M., Kumar, S. M., & Dhakal, A. (2008). Modern energy use by the urban poor in Thailand: a study of slum households in two cities. Energy for Sustainable Development, 12(4), 5-13.
- Stern, P. C., & Aronson, E. (1984). Energy Use: The Human Dimension. New York: National Academy Press.
- Thomson, H., & Snell, C. (2013). Quantifying the prevalence of fuel poverty across the European Union. Energy Policy, 52, 563-572.
- UN, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2017). International Migration Report 2017.
- USmartConsumer FP7 Project (2015). Smart Consumer – Smart Customer – Smart Citizen.
- Van Wee, B. (2009). Self-selection: a key to a better understanding of location choices travel behaviour and transport externalities? Transport Reviews, 29(3), 279-292.
- Walsh, M. J. (1989). Energy tax credits and housing improvements. Energy Economics, 11(4), 275-284.
- Wilhite, H., & Ling, R. (1995). Measured energy savings from a more informative energy bill. Energy and Building, 22(2), 145- 155.
- Young, D. (2008). When do energy-efficient appliances generate energy savings? Some evidence from Canada. Energy Policy, 36(1), 34-46.
-
The processing of advertising: does a consumer’s level of materialism make a difference?
Materialism has been given great attention in the consumer behavior literature. How materialistic tendencies are shaped by advertising has also been documented. Yet, the impact of consumers’ materialism on their perceptions of ads is not clearly understood. The goal of this research is to examine the relationship between an individual’s materialism and his/her perceptions of various kinds of advertising. Using four specific advertising appeals (i.e., interpersonal, prestige/status, achievement, and appearance-related), attitudes toward the ad, and thoughts elicited by the advertisement were measured and compared across high and low materialism groups. Significant differences were found between respondents from the two groups with respect to the evaluation of each type of appeal. When prestige/status, achievement, and appearance-related appeals were used in advertising, they were evaluated more favorably by consumers with high levels of materialism than by consumers with low levels of materialism. In contrast, advertising that used an interpersonal appeal was viewed more favorably by consumers with low levels of materialism. The results of this research provide implications for marketers on three perspectives: the furthering of our conceptualization of the materialism construct, the design of promotional communication for specific target markets, and the public policy dimension of targeting consumers more vulnerable to certain appeals.
-
Discovering the values of generation X and millennial consumers in Indonesia
Arief Helmi ,
Vita Sarasi ,
Umi Kaltum ,
Yogi Suherman
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(2).2021.01
Millennials and Generation X (Gen-X) are the fastest-growing market segment in Indonesia. The study aims to discover the salient values of those generations and to investigate their value differences. Data were obtained via questionnaires from 200 respondents of each generation. The questionnaires measure the importance of the values of each generation, consisting of nine values from the List of Values established by Kahle (1986), namely Sense of belonging, Excitement, Being well respected, Fun and enjoyment, Security, Self-fulfillment, Self-respect, Warm relationships with others, and Sense of accomplishment. This study employed factor analysis to identify sets of values representing their underlying values. This method resulted in three inherent values of Gen X and two of Millenials. Gen X shows the importance of Achievement, Family enjoyment, and Social relationship. Meanwhile, the Millennials are conspicuous by the values of Social recognition and Self-pleasing. Companies that choose Gen X as their target market can use their above-mentioned values to be expressed in their marketing strategies. Meanwhile, those who choose Millennials may use the two inherent values of this generation. This study fills a research gap on the characters of the emerging young generation segments in the country that can be adopted to generate market segment characters in the country.
Acknowledgment
This work was funded by a research grant from the Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia. -
Online impulse buying on TikTok platform: Evidence from Indonesia
Nur Rizqi Febriandika ,
Alfinna Putri Utami ,
Afifah Nur Millatina
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(3).2023.17
Innovative Marketing Volume 19, 2023 Issue #3 pp. 197-210 Views: 1888 Downloads: 609 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯTikTok Shop boosts TikTok’s huge potential as an e-commerce platform that encourages sellers and buyers to increase the number of transactions. The emergence of this feature encourages the online impulse buying phenomenon on the TikTok platform. This study aims to examine the factors that influence online impulse buying on TikTok in Indonesia through the constructs of brand review, sales promotion, customer satisfaction, religiosity, and brand expectation. This quantitative research uses a questionnaire that is distributed randomly online and collected from 312 respondents in Indonesia. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), data analysis was conducted and hypotheses were examined. The results show that customer satisfaction (β: 0.501) and brand review (β: 0.358) play an important role in increasing brand expectation. At the same time, sales promotion (ρ-value > 0.05) has no impact on brand expectation. This study highlights that religiosity (β: –0.239) and brand expectation (β: –0.510) can reduce online impulse buying behavior. Brand expectation (β: –0.510) is the most dominant variable in reducing online impulse buying behavior on TikTok.
