Economic growth and conservation effort in the Congo Basin
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.03
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2021, Issue #1, pp. 32-38
- Cited by
- 570 Views
-
174 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In a world increasingly subject to climate change, protected areas are of particular importance for conserving biodiversity and human livelihoods. Therefore, they play an important role in helping many species, populations, and countries adapt to climate change. This paper analyzes the effects of economic growth on the evolution of the protected areas. The study examines this relation using a sample of nine countries of the Congo Basin from 1990 to 2010. The econometric results show that an increase in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita has a positive impact on the extent of the protected area in this region regardless of the model chosen. Therefore, economic growth is a means used for the preservation of biodiversity in the Congo Basin. Moreover, the population density is negative and statistically significant. This shows that the protected areas of the Congo Basin are particularly threatened in densely populated areas.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q01, Q20
-
References26
-
Tables2
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Description of the sample
- Table 2. Relation between economic growth and protected areas in the Congo Basin
-
- Bakehe, N. P. (2018). Decomposition of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation in the Congo Basin. Economics Bulletin, 38(2), 1058-1068.
- Beckerman, W. (1992). Economic Growth and the Environment: Whose Growth? Whose Environment? World Development, 20(4), 481-496.
- Bertzky, B., Corrigan, C., Kemsey, J., Kenney, S., Ravilious, C., Besançon, C., & Burgess, N. D. (2012). Protected Planet Report 2012: Tracking Progress Towards Global Targets for Protected Areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
- Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
- Deacon, R. T. (1994). Deforestation and the rule of law in a cross section of countries. Land Economics, 70(4), 414-430.
- Didia, D. O. (1997). Democracy, political instability and tropical deforestation. Global Environmental Change, 7(1), 63-76.
- Dietz, S., & Adger, W. N. (2001). Economic growth, biodiversity loss and conservation effort. Journal of Environmental Management, 68(1), 23-35.
- Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NBER Working Paper No. 3914). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1994). Economic Growth and the Environment (NBER Working Paper No. 4634).
- Harbaugh, W., Levinson, A., & Wilson, D. (2000). Reexamining the Empirical Evidence for an EKC (NBER Working Paper No. 7711). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.
- Holtz-Eakin, D., & Selden, T. (1995). Stoking the Fires? CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth. Journal of Public Economics, 57(1), 85-101.
- Kauano, E. E., Cardoso Silva, J. M., Filho, J. A. F. D., & Michalski, F. (2020). Do protected areas hamper economic development of the Amazon region? An analysis of the relationship between protected areas and the economic growth of Brazilian Amazon municipalities. Land Use Policy, 92, 104473.
- Koop, G., & Tole, L. (1999). Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation? Journal of Development Economics, 58(1), 231-244.
- Lightfoot, D. R. (1994). An assessment of the relationship between development and institutionally preserved lands. Area, 26(2), 112-122.
- Megevand, C., Mosnier, A., Hourticq, J., Sanders, K., & Doetinchem, N. (2013). Deforestation Trends in the Congo Basin: Reconciling Economic Growth and Forest Protection. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Meunié, A. (2004). Controverses autour de la courbe environnementale de Kuznets (Document de travail No. DT/107/2004). Centre d’économie du développement de l’Université de Bordeaux IV. (In French).
- Nguyen Van, P., & Azomahou, T. (2007). Nonlinearities and heterogeneity in environmental quality: An empirical analysis of deforestation. Journal of Development Economics, 84(1), 291-309.
- Nourry, M. (2007). Economie Growth: a Means to Fight Pollution? Lessons from the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Revue Française D’économie, 21(3), 137-176. (In French).
- Selden, T., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147-162.
- Shafik, N. (1994). Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(1), 757-773.
- Shafik, N., & Bandayopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic Development and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross-Country Evidence (Working Papers No. WPS 904). Background Paper for the World Development Report 1992.
- Stern, D. I., & Common, M. S. (2001). Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur? Journal of Environmental and Management, 41(2), 162-178.
- Suri, V., & Chapmad, N. (1998). Economic Growth, Trade and Energy: Implication for the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 195-208.
- Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., & Hockings, M. (2014). The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515, 67-73.
- World Bank. (2018). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC.