Discovering the values of generation X and millennial consumers in Indonesia
-
Author(s)Arief HelmiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3781-4852
,
Vita SarasiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6750-2345
,
Umi KaltumLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9324-6605
,
Yogi SuhermanLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-9088
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(2).2021.01
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2021, Issue #2, pp. 1-8
- Cited by
- 2299 Views
-
2739 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Millennials and Generation X (Gen-X) are the fastest-growing market segment in Indonesia. The study aims to discover the salient values of those generations and to investigate their value differences. Data were obtained via questionnaires from 200 respondents of each generation. The questionnaires measure the importance of the values of each generation, consisting of nine values from the List of Values established by Kahle (1986), namely Sense of belonging, Excitement, Being well respected, Fun and enjoyment, Security, Self-fulfillment, Self-respect, Warm relationships with others, and Sense of accomplishment. This study employed factor analysis to identify sets of values representing their underlying values. This method resulted in three inherent values of Gen X and two of Millenials. Gen X shows the importance of Achievement, Family enjoyment, and Social relationship. Meanwhile, the Millennials are conspicuous by the values of Social recognition and Self-pleasing. Companies that choose Gen X as their target market can use their above-mentioned values to be expressed in their marketing strategies. Meanwhile, those who choose Millennials may use the two inherent values of this generation. This study fills a research gap on the characters of the emerging young generation segments in the country that can be adopted to generate market segment characters in the country.
Acknowledgment
This work was funded by a research grant from the Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C38, M31, M39
-
References42
-
Tables2
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Kahle’s (1986) List of Values (LOV)
- Table 2. Rotated component matrix
-
- Bencsik, A., & Machova, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing problems from the viewpoint of intergenerational management (St Petersburg: Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited).
- Chaney, D., Tauzani, M., & Slimane, K. B. (2017). Marketing to the (new) generations: summary and perspectives. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(3), 179-189.
- De Meuse, K. P., Bergmann, T. J., & Lester, S. W. (2001). An investigation of the relational component of the psychological contract across time, generation and employment status. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(1), 102-118.
- De Mooij, M. (2019). Consumer behavior and culture (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Wshington DC, Melbourne: Sage.
- Gauzente, C., & Roy, Y. (2012). Message content in keyword campaigns, click behavior, and price-consciousness: A study of millennial consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19, 78-87.
- Gurel-Atay, E., Xie, G.X., Chen, J., & Kahle, L.R. (2010). Changes in Social Values in the United States: 1976–2007. Journal of Advertising Research, 50(1), 57-67.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis (8 th Edition). India: Chengage.
- Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J., & Coney, K.A. (1992). Consumer Behavior: Implications for Marketing Strategy, Irwin Chicago.
- Henry, W. A., (1976). Cultural values do correlate with consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing Research 13(2), 121-127.
- Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International differences in work related values (Abridged edition). New Burry Park, London and New Delhi: Sage.
- Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638-46.
- Howell, R. (2015). Market segmentation: The importance of age cohorts. The Neumann Business Review, 21-54.
- Hyllegard, K., Yan, R., Ogle, J., & Attmann, J. (2011). The influence of gender, social cause, charitable support, and message appeal on Gen Y’s responses to cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(1/2), 100-123.
- Hymowitz, C. (2007, July 9). Managers find ways to get generations to close culture gaps. Wall Street Journal, p. B.1.
- Kahle, L. R., Beatty, S. E., & Homer, P. (1986). Alternative measurement approaches to consumer values: The list of values (LOV) and the values and lifestyle (VALS). Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 405-9.
- Kahle, L. R.,& Xie, G. X. (2018). Handbook of consumer psychology. In Curtis P. Haugtvedt, Paul M. Herr, Frank R. Kardes, eBook. New York: Routledge.
- Kaifi, B. A., Nafei, W. A., Khanfar, N. M., & Kaifi, M. M. (2012). A multi-generational workforce: Managing and understanding millennials. International Journal of Business & Management, 7(24), 88-93.
- Karababa, E., & Kjeldgaard, D. (2013). Value in marketing: Toward sociocultural perspective. Marketing Theory, 14(1), 119-127.
- Kim, H. Y., & Chung, J. E. (2011). Consumer purchase intention for organic personal care products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 40-47.
- Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. Health Care Manager, 19, 65-76.
- Lascu, D. N., Manrai, L. A., & Manrai, A. K. (1996). Value differences between Polish and Romanian consumers: A caution against using a regiocentric marketing orientation in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 8, 145-67.
- Leng, C. Y., & Botelho, D. (2010). How does national culture impact on consumers’ decision-making style? A cross-cultural study in Brazil, the United States, and Japan. BAR – Brazilian Administration Review, 7(3), 260-275.
- Meredith, G., & Schewe, C. D. (2004). Segmenting global markets by generational cohorts: determining motivations by age. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 51.
- Mitchell, A. (1983). The nine American lifestyles. New York: Warner.
- Parment, A. (2013). Generation Y vs. Baby Boomers: Shopping behavior, buyer involvement and implications for retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20, 189-199.
- Reisenwitz, T., & Iyer, R. (2009). Differences in generation x and generation y: Implications for the organization and marketers. Marketing Management Journal, 19(2), 91-103.
- Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Rokeach. M., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1989). Stability and Change in American value priorities. American Psychologist, 44, 775-784.
- Schwartz., S.H., (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
- Sheeraz, M., Nadeem, I., & Ahmed, N. (2012). Impact of Brand Credibility and Consumer Values on Consumer Purchase Intentions in Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences August, 2(8), 1-10.
- Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.
- Shoham, A., Florenthal,B., Rose, G. M., & Kropp, F. (1998). Differences in value importance: The impact of age and gender in the Israeli population. Association for Consumer Research, 25, 468-474.
- Solomon, M. R. (2010). Consumer behavior: buying, having, and being (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Smith, K. T. (2012). Longitudinal study of digital marketing strategies targeting Millennials. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 86-92.
- Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1992). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: Harper Perennial.
- Twenge, J. M., S. M. Campbell, B. J. Hoffman, & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and Intrinsic Values Decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117-1142.
- Vinson, D. E., Scott, J. E., & Lamont, L. M. (1977). The role of personal values in marketing and consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 44.
- Watkins, L., & Gnoth, J. (2005). Methodological issues in using Kahle’s list of values scale for Japanese tourism behavior. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 11(3), 225-233.
- Whitney, G. J., Greenwood, R. A., & Murphy, Jr., E. F. (2009). Generational differences in the work place: Personal values, behaviors, and popular beliefs. Journal of Diversity Management (JDM), 4(3), 1-8.
- Williams. K. C., & Page. R. A. (2011). Marketing to the gene-rations. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 3(1), 37-53.
- Wellner, A. S. (2003). The next 25 years. American Demographics, 25, 26-29.
-
The processing of advertising: does a consumer’s level of materialism make a difference?
Materialism has been given great attention in the consumer behavior literature. How materialistic tendencies are shaped by advertising has also been documented. Yet, the impact of consumers’ materialism on their perceptions of ads is not clearly understood. The goal of this research is to examine the relationship between an individual’s materialism and his/her perceptions of various kinds of advertising. Using four specific advertising appeals (i.e., interpersonal, prestige/status, achievement, and appearance-related), attitudes toward the ad, and thoughts elicited by the advertisement were measured and compared across high and low materialism groups. Significant differences were found between respondents from the two groups with respect to the evaluation of each type of appeal. When prestige/status, achievement, and appearance-related appeals were used in advertising, they were evaluated more favorably by consumers with high levels of materialism than by consumers with low levels of materialism. In contrast, advertising that used an interpersonal appeal was viewed more favorably by consumers with low levels of materialism. The results of this research provide implications for marketers on three perspectives: the furthering of our conceptualization of the materialism construct, the design of promotional communication for specific target markets, and the public policy dimension of targeting consumers more vulnerable to certain appeals.
-
A review on household energy consumption behavior: how about migrated consumers?
Ebru Acuner ,
M. Özgür Kayalica 
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.09(4).2018.02
Environmental Economics Volume 9, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 8-21 Views: 2506 Downloads: 835 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper reviews the literature on energy consumption behavior for both domestic and migrated/displaced population and aims to recommend crucial policy measures for creating awareness on the energy efficiency. Consumers’ adoption to the efficient usage of energy varies depending on demographic, behavioral and situational dynamics in their households and societies. The regional or national strategies to implement efficient technologies for the consumer engagement are crucial to change their behaviors. Migrants affect the energy usage patterns in the host country due to their different usage behaviors. Any type of measures for migrated population should include available, acceptable, accessible and affordable energy efficiency applications to engage them with the domestic population.
-
Factors that affect customer loyalty in small enterprises
Zeleke Worku
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.15(4).2019.07
The study was conducted by collecting the data from 608 customers of migrant retailers working in the retail industry of Pretoria West in South Africa in order to identify socioeconomic factors that affect customer loyalty. Data was collected from eligible respondents by using a pre-tested, validated and standardised questionnaire of study that was self-administered by respondents. The study found that about 69% of customers were loyal to their retailers. About 68% of customers had a favorable attitude towards their retailers. About 68% of retailers used appropriate promotional measures for marketing their goods to potential customers. About 69% of retailers provided their customers with satisfactory quality of services. About 67% of customers were loyal to their retailers’ brands. Factor analysis was used for extracting 3 influential predictors of customer loyalty. These factors were entrepreneurial skills, marketing skills, and selling price. The percentage of variance explained by the 3 extracted factors was equal to 92.58%.
