Determinants of innovativeness of Slovak SMEs
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.17
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #1, pp. 198-208
- Cited by
- 1103 Views
-
387 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The integration of the Slovak Republic into the European Union and the globalization process create conditions that significantly reduce barriers to entry into particular markets, but, on the other hand, enhance the intensity of competition. The relevance of the study lies in the extent of the European Union’s support for the effectiveness of innovation activities in Slovakia. This paper investigates the influence of endogenous and exogenous factors on the competitiveness of Slovak enterprises over the period 2006–2018. The study is aimed at determining the causal relationship of factors that determine the competitiveness of enterprises. To investigate the relationship between the endogenous and exogenous factors, the Granger causality method is used. Mathematical models are used to identify the relationship between innovation expenditures on the one hand and different types of innovation activity with market expansion on the other. The results of the study provide a statistically significant relationship between the performance measured by the percentage of revenues of enterprises that have introduced innovations with a two-year lag and the concentration measured by the total R&D expenditure of an enterprise. The results of this study should also be used to ensure that, in the case of the Slovak SME sector, R&D expenditure is a significant driver of innovation in enterprises, as innovation in enterprises is expected to improve the quality of products and services, increase profits and expansion in domestic and foreign markets.
Acknowledgment
This paper has been supported by funds of the project VEGA No. 1/0240/20 and VEGA No. 1/0813/19 Managing the development of innovative and start-up forms of businesses in international environment and verification of INMARK concept, which has received funding from the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M21, O31, O32
-
References43
-
Tables3
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. European innovation scoreboard 2019
- Figure 2. Q-Q plots for X2, X3, X4, P2, P7, and P8
-
- Table 1. ADF test
- Table 2. Granger causality test – F statistics
- Table 3. Granger causality test for combinations – F statistics
-
- Acs, Z. J., de Groot, H. L. F., & Nijkamp, P. (2002). The emergence of the knowledge economy: A regional perspective. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Bajzíková, L., & Bajzík, P. (2020). Mobility and working opportunities in the EU and Slovakia. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 25(1), 103-115.
- Chehabeddine, M., & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2020). Securing regional development. Insights into Regional Development, 2(1), 430-442.
- Čižo, E., Lavrinenko, O., & Ignatjeva, S. (2020). Analysis of the relationship between financial development and economic growth in the EU countries. Insights into Regional Development, 2(3), 645-660.
- Cvetanovič, S., & Despotovič, D. (2014). Knowledge as the component of human capital in economic growth models. Škola Biznisa, 1, 1-17.
- Funta, R. (2012). Legal and economic analysis of cartels, their enforcement and the leniency program. DANUBE, 2, 35-47.
- Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
- Halasi, D., Schwarcz, P., Mura, L., & Roháčiková, O. (2019). The impact of EU support resources on business success of family-owned businesses. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 13(1), 846-853.
- Hao, J., Li, C., Yuan, R. Ahmed, M., Khan, M.A., & Oláh, J. (2020). The Influence of the Knowledge-Based Network Structure Hole on Enterprise Innovation Performance: The Threshold Effect of R&D Investment Intensity. Sustainability, 12(15), 6155.
- Havierniková, K., Lemańska-Majdzik, A., & Mura, L. (2017). Advantages and Disadvantages of the Participation of SMEs in Tourism Clusters. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 8(6), 1205-1215.
- Haviernikova, K., Snieska, V., Navickas, V., & Burksaitiene, D. (2019). The attitudes of small and medium entrepreneurs toward cluster cooperation: the expectations and reality. Transformations in Business & Economics, 18(3), 191-205.
- Horecký, J., & Blažek, M. (2019). Dependent work and internship. Central European Journal of Labour Law and Personnel Management, 2(2), 7-20.
- Hudáková, J., Fiľa, M., & Maroš, M. (2017). Innovation potential of the regions in the Slovak republic. Acta Oeconomica Universitatis Selye, 6(2), 81-88.
- Kaufmann, H. R., Tsangar, H., & Vrontis, D. (2012). Innovativeness of European SMEs: Mission not yet accomplished. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 25(2), 333-360.
- Kijek, A., Lisowski, M., & Starzyńska, W. (2013). Innovation activity of the Polish manufacturing enterprises. International Advances in Economic Research, 19(1), 33-43.
- Kijek, T. (2013). Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Technological and Marketing Innovations: A Case of Polish Manufacturing Firms. Oeconomia, 12(2), 15-25.
- Kiselyova, E. (2020). Labor compliance as an instrument of labor relations control. Central European Journal of Labour Law and Personnel Management, 3(1), 22-33.
- Kotaskova, A., & Rozsa, Z. (2018). The impact of selected factors on the quality of business environment assessment in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 6(2), 71-80.
- Kovaľová, M., & Kulčár, L. (2017). Innovation management and information acquisition. Acta Oeconomica Universitatis Selye, 6(2), 101-108.
- Kovaľová, M., Hvolková, L., Klement, L., & Klementová, V. (2018). Innovation strategies in the Slovak enterprises. Acta Oeconomica Universitatis Selye, 7(1), 79-89.
- Lazikova, J., Bandlerova, A., Rohacikova, O., Schwarcz, P., & Rumanovská, L. (2018). Regional Disparities of Small and Medium Enterprises in Slovakia. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 15(8), 227-246.
- Lundvall, B. A., & Lorenz, E. (2011). From the Lisbon strategy to Europe 2020. In N. Morel, B. Palier, & J. Palme (Eds), Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges (pp. 333-351). Bristol: Policy Press.
- Medrano-Sáez, N., & Olarte-Pascual, M. (2012). Marketing innovation as an opportunity in a situation of uncertainity: the Spanish case. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 286, 327-341.
- Mészáros, M., & Divékyová, K. (2019). Immediate termination of employment relationship by the employer. Central European Journal of Labour Law and Personnel Management, 2(2), 33-43.
- Metzker, Z., & Streimikis, J. (2020). CSR activities in the Czech SME segment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 8(1), 49-64.
- Milošovičová, P., Mittelman, A. Mucha, B., & Peráček, T. (2018). The particularities of entrepreneurship according to the trade licensing act in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. 31st International Business Information Management Association Conference: Innovation Management and Education (pp. 2736-2745).
- Milovic, N., Jocovic, M., & Djurisic, V. (2020). The role of entrepreneurship in the development of local self-governments in Montenegro. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19(2), 159-170.
- Mucha, B. (2019). Tools to increase the effectiveness of comprehensive management of emergencies affected by climate change in the Slovak republic. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, 19(5.4), 573-580.
- Mura, L., & Mazák, M. (2018). Innovative activities of family SMEs: case study of the Slovak regions. On-line Journal Modelling the New Europe, 27, 132-147.
- Nikolič, M., Cvetanovič, D., & Despotovič, D. (2015). Innovativeness of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Republic of Serbia and Countries of the European Union. Marketing, 46(3), 197-206.
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Oslo Manual (3rd ed.). Paris.
- Pekerşen, Y., & Tugay, O. (2020). Professional Satisfaction as a Key Factor in Employee Retention: A case of the Service Sector. Journal of Tourism and Services, 11(20), 1-27.
- Pimonenko, T., Prokopenko, O., & Dado, J. (2017). Net zero house: EU experience in Ukrainian conditions. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 38(4), 46-57.
- Prasetyo, P. E., & Kistanti, N. R. (2020). Human capital, institutional economics and entrepreneurship as a driver for quality and sustainable economic growth. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 2575-2589.
- Prokopenko, O., Eremenko, Y., & Omelyanenko, V. (2014). Role of international factor in innovation ecosystem formation. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(2), 4-7.
- Prokopenko, O., Omelyanenko, V., & Klisinski, J. (2018). Innovation policy development conceptual framework for national resource security providing. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 9(5), 1099-1107.
- Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Stock, G. N., Greis, N. P., & Fischer W. A. (2002). Firm size and dynamic technological innovation. Technovation, 22(9), 537-549.
- Tilford, S., & Whyte, P. (2010). Lisbon Scorecars X: The Road to 2020. London: Centre for European Reform.
- Vekic, A., Djakovic, V., Borocki, J., Sroka, W., Popp, J., & Olàh, J. (2020). The Importance of Academic New Ventures for Sustainable Regional Development. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(54), 533-550.
- Virglerova, Z., Khan, M. A., Martinkute-Kauliene, R., & Kovács, S. (2020). The Internationalization of SMEs in Central Europe and Its Impact on Their Methods of Risk Management. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(55), 792-807.
- Wieser, R. (2005). Research and Development Productivity and Spilovers: Empirical Evidence at the Firm Level. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(4), 587-621.
- Zamanbekov, S., Dogalov, A., Zamanbekov, D., Bildebayeva, A., Cheirkhanova, A., Bakirbekova, A., & Sikhimbayeva, B. (2020). Regional development of small and midsize businesses in the conditions of forming of innovative economy of Kazakhstan: a case study. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(1), 618-639.