Deposit money banks’ efficiency in three years after, during and before the 2004–2005 consolidation in Nigeria: the puzzle on size

  • 846 Views
  • 185 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

In this paper, the authors examined the efficiency of deposit money banks (DMBs) in Nigeria in three years after, during and before the 2004–2005 capital consolidation in Nigeria. This consolidation period was the last period the Central Bank of Nigeria implemented an official recapitalization policy of the deposit money banks in the country. The authors predicated the study on a modified intermediation and efficiency measurement frameworks. It utilizes deposits, fixed assets and employees as inputs, whose costs are interest payments, depreciation and staff expenses. Performing loans and advances, investments and liquid assets constituted the output variables. The authors computed the efficiency scores, using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach. The data used were obtained from the DMBs that retained their identities and controlled over 75% of the banking industry’s total assets. They were purposively selected to maintain data consistency, and were size-classified by total assets. The findings show that small banks tend to be more cost efficient than medium and big banks. More so, medium sized banks tend to be more cost efficient than big banks, while big banks take the lead in cost efficiency score in post consolidation period. Cost efficiency of the banks was the highest during consolidation, followed by pre-consolidation and least in three years after consolidation.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Measured mean efficiency of the deposit money banks in 2001
    • Table 2. Measured mean efficiency of the deposit money banks in 2002
    • Table 3. Measured mean efficiency of the deposit money banks in 2003
    • Table 4. A 3-year measured average efficiency of the deposit money banks in 2001‒2003 pre-consolidation period
    • Table 5. Measured mean efficiency of the deposit money banks in 2004
    • Table 6. Measured mean efficiency of the deposit money banks in 2005
    • Table 7. A 2-year measured mean efficiency of the deposit money banks in 2004–2005 consolidation period
    • Table 8. Measured mean efficiency of the deposit money banks in 2006
    • Table 9. Measured mean efficiency of the deposit money banks in 2007
    • Table 10. Measured mean efficiency of the deposit money banks in 2008
    • Table 11. 3-year measured mean efficiency of the deposit money banks (2006‒2008)
    • Aiello, F., & Bonanno, G. (2016). Looking at the determinants of efficiency in banking: Evidence from Italian mutual-cooperatives. International Review of Applied Economics, 30(4), 507-526.
    • Altunbas, Y., Liu, M. H., Molyneux, P., & Seth, R. (2000). Efficiency and risk in Japanese banking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1605-28.
    • Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1991). The dominance of inefficiencies over scale and product Mix Economies in Banking. Journal of Monetary Economies, 28, 113-148.
    • Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1992). Measurement and efficiency issues in commercial banking. In Grilliches (Eds.), Measurement issues in the services sectors (pp. 245-279). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Bwala, S. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of the operational efficiency of insured banks in Nigeria. Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation Quarterly, 13, 55-72.
    • Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’ Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity (2nd ed.). Springer, New York.
    • Chen, Y. (2001). Three essays on bank efficiency. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Finance: Drexel University.
    • Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19, 273-292.
    • Deng, C., Liu, T., & Wu, J. (2007). Efficiency analysis of China’s commercial banks based on DEA: Negative output investigation. China-USA Business Review, 6(2), 50-56.
    • Drake, L. (2003). Cost and efficiency in banking: A survey of the evidence from the U.S., the U.K and Japan. In Mullineux, A. W., & Murinde, V. (Eds.), Handbook of international banking (pp. 283-327). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.
    • Fadiran, T. P. (2006). The effect of management quality on banks’ survival. M.Sc. Project. Department of Economics: University of Ibadan.
    • Fare, S., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A. CXX 3, 253-290.
    • Ferrier, G. D., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1990). Measuring cost efficiency in banking. Econometric and linear programming evidence. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 229-245.
    • Hughes, J. P., Jagtiani, J., & Mester, L. J. (2016). Is bigger necessarily better in community banking? (Working Paper No. 16-15). Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    • Humphrey, D. B. (1993). Cost and technical change: Effects from bank deregulation. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4, 5-34.
    • Jemric, I., & Vujcic, B. (2002). Efficiency of banks in Croatia: A DEAB approach. Croatian National Bank Working Papers, 1-13.
    • Kasman, A. (2002). Cost efficiency, scale economies and technological progress in Turkish banking. Central Bank Review, 1, 1-20.
    • Koopmans, T. C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In Koopmans, T.C. (Ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation. Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph 13. New York, NY: Wiley.
    • Kwan, S. H., & Eisenbeis, R. A. (1996). An analysis of inefficiencies in banking: A stochastic cost frontier approach. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review, 2, 17-26.
    • Maudos, J., Pastor, J., Perez, F., & Quesada, J. (2002). Cost and profit efficiency in European Banks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 12(1), 33-58.
    • Ncube, M. (2009). Efficiency of the banking sector in South Africa. African Development Bank.
    • Obafemi, F. N. (2008). The efficiency of the Nigerian banking industry: A data envelopment analysis approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Economics: University of Calabar.
    • Obafemi, F. N. (2012). The technical efficiency of Nigerian banks. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 2(2), 407-420.
    • Obafemi, F. N., Ayodele, O. S., & Ebong, F. S. (2013). The sources of efficiency in the Nigerian banking industry: A two-stage approach. International Journal of Finance and Banking Studies, 2(4), 78-91.
    • Oke, D. M. (2016). Bank consolidation and scale economies of deposit money banks in Nigeria. In Nwokoma, N. I., & Isola, W. A. (Eds.), Nigeria’s industrial development, corporate governance and public policy (pp. 545-558). Lagos: University of Lagos Press.
    • Olaosebikan, B. (2009). Surveying efficiencies of Nigerian banks before and after the minimum capital requirement increase. Honours Project: Illinois Wesleyan University.
    • Oluitan, R. (2010). Bank efficiency in Africa (pp. 60-83). Masters’ Thesis: Brunel University.
    • Omankhanlen, A. E. (2013). Nigerian banks’ efficiency performance: A post 2014 banking reforms evaluation. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis: Covenant University.
    • Rao, A. (2002). Estimation of efficiency, scale and scope and productivity measures of UAE banks. Paper presented at the European Conference of Financial Management Association International (FMAI-USA). Copenhagen: Denmark, 6 June 2002.
    • Raphael, G. (2012). Commercial banks’ efficiency in Tanzania: A non-parametric approach. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(21), 55-67.
    • Saha, A., & Dash, U. (2016). Consolidation in Indian banking: Does size matter? Decision, 43(3), 223-238.
    • Sensarma, R. (2006). Are foreign banks always the best? Comparison of state-owned, private and foreign banks in India. Economic Modeling, 23, 717-735.
    • Sherman, H. D., & Gold, F. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9, 279-315.
    • Sobodu, O. O., & Akiode, P. O. (1995). Financial reforms and the Nigerian banking system: Analysis of intertemporal changes in efficiency. African Journal of Economic Policy, 2(2), 35-53.
    • Suhaimi, R. (2005). Cost efficiency and K-economy of commercial banks in Malaysia. Unpublished Paper.
    • Tannewald, R. (1995). Differences across first district banks in operational efficiency. New England Economic Review, 3, 41-60.
    • Yeh, Q. J. (1996). The application of data envelopment analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 980-988.
Related Articles

  • Corporate governance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of selected multinational firms in Nigeria

    Gideon Tayo Akinleye , Odunayo OlarewajuORCID Researcher ID, Bamikole Samson Fajuyagbe doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.02
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #1         pp. 11-18 Views: 3386 Downloads: 568 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This study focused on corporate governance and performance of selected Nigerian multinational firms from 2012 to 2016. Specifically, the study focused on the effect of board size, activism and committee activism on return on asset and firm growth rate. Secondary data collected from four multinational firms were analyzed via static panel estimation techniques. While board size and board activism exerted significant negative impact on return on asset, committee activism exerted insignificant impact. The results of the study further showed that board size and board activism exert insignificant negative impact on firm’s growth rate, while committee activism insignificantly spurs firm’s growth rate. Decisively, discoveries from this study reflect that corporate governance has significant negative impact on return on asset, but has insignificant influence on the growth rate of Nigerian multinational firms. Based on these findings, the authors recommended that corporate governance dynamics in firms world over should be reconsidered, such that it gives credence to more than just numbers of persons or meetings held, but the main reasons and deliberations in such meetings. It was also recommended that excessive increase in magnitude or frequency of meetings held by board of directors cum committee should be avoided.

  • Evaluating the nationalization & privatization effect: a case of Indian banking industry

    Manju Rajan BabuORCID , Ashok Kumar M.ORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(1).2018.02
    Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018         Issue #1         pp. 11-21 Views: 2855 Downloads: 403 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The facilitation of economic transactions and friendly investor environment is undertaken through effective performance of financial systems. Mobilization of savings and funding the profitable business opportunities are essential in improving the efficiency of intermediation. The study aims to evaluate the effects of nationalization and privatization on Indian banks. Various factors have been considered to examine the effects of privatization and nationalization, including sources of public sector inefficiency, measures of firm performance, econometric issues, and the mode of privatization. The data was collected for the period of 1998 to 2016 from Indian banks. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used to evaluate the financial reports of the banks selected to evaluate the efficiency of input and output variables. Positive results were observed, concerning the efficiency and profitability of banking industry after banks’ privatization. Performance of private banks has been observed effective and efficient as compared to the public sector banks. Privatization of banks must be increased and maintained to sustain the efficiency of the banks and implement strategies to maintain the assets. Future studies may recruit more appropriate sample size to evaluate the privatization and nationalization effects of Indian banking industry. Greater number of banks will provide more precise results, using data envelopment analysis.

  • Academic resilience, emotional intelligence, and academic performance among undergraduate students

    Uzoma OnonyeORCID , Mercy Ogbeta , Francis NdudiORCID , Dudutari Bereprebofa , Ikechuckwu Maduemezia doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.06(1).2022.01
    Knowledge and Performance Management Volume 6, 2022         Issue #1         pp. 1-10 Views: 2801 Downloads: 858 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Academic resilience and emotional intelligence are considered important personal resources for furthering students’ academic performance. However, many educational organizations seem to trivialize the performance implications of these constructs in teachings and curriculum. Consequently, it can decrease not just their academic performance but also their employability, as they lack the generic competencies to adapt and survive in a stressful context. Even so, empirical evidence on integrating academic resilience, emotional intelligence, and academic performance remains unexplored in the Nigerian university context. Therefore, the study aimed to investigate the linkages between academic resilience, emotional intelligence, and academic performance in Nigeria. The partial least square (PLS) modeling method was utilized for testing the stated hypotheses with data collected from 179 final year undergraduate students in the regular B.Sc. Business Administration and B.Sc. Marketing program at Delta State University, Nigeria. From the PLS results, the study reported that academic resilience was positively related to emotional intelligence (β = 0.125, p = 0.007), academic resilience (β = 0.231, p = 0.000) and emotional intelligence (β = 0.260, p = 0.000) were positively related to academic performance, and emotional resilience mediated the positive relationship between academic resilience and academic performance (β = 0.057, p = 0.005). While academic resilience predicted academic performance, it also predicted emotional intelligence, which affected academic performance significantly and positively.

Download Preview
Close
Banks and Bank Systems
Banks and Bank Systems