Deciphering the temporal dynamics of consumer decisions: the interplay of cognitive load and response correctness
-
Author(s)Vladimír HojdikLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6955-1677
,
Peter ŠtetkaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8444-3332
,
Nora GrisákováLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7032-042X
,
Daniela RybárováLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7198-4295
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.20(3).2024.19
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2024, Issue #3, pp. 237-248
- 120 Views
-
24 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study delves into the impact of visual marketing stimuli on consumer response times, focusing on the complexity and subjectivity of the questions posed. Conducted in Slovakia, the research involved 40 participants (20 men and 20 women, aged 30 to 50 years), all holding university degrees in economics to ensure consistent decision-making experience. Participants were presented with visual stimuli representing four well-known FMCG brands. The stimuli included simple brand preference questions and complex evaluative judgments of offer efficiency. Response times were measured in milliseconds and analyzed using statistical methods, including the Mann-Whitney U test and one-way ANOVA. Results revealed that responses to simple stimuli averaged 1212 ms, while complex stimuli elicited slower responses, averaging 2504 ms. A significant difference was observed for “No” answers in the offer evaluation tasks, with correct “No” responses taking 3000 ms compared to 2297 ms for incorrect ones (p < 0.05), highlighting the cognitive load involved in accurate decision-making. These findings provide valuable insights into the cognitive processes driving consumer decision-making and contribute to the theoretical understanding of how question complexity and subjectivity influence response times.
Acknowledgment
This paper was funded by research grant VEGA 1/0462/23 entitled “Circular economy in the context of societal demands and market limitations“ (100% share).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D12, D91, M31
-
References31
-
Tables4
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Comparison of response times by group based on answer type and correctness
- Figure 2. Average response time per respondent (ms)
- Figure 3. Average response time per respondent (ms)
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistical analysis of response times for brand preference inquiry (question 1)
- Table 2. Comparative summary of response time differences based on answer type for brand preference inquiry
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics for response times to price offer evaluations (question 2), distinguished by answer correctness and type
- Table 4. Statistical analysis of response time differences by answer type and correctness (Mann-Whitney U test results)
-
- Adam, J., Paas, F., Buekers, M., Wuyts, I., Spijkers, W., & Wallmeyer, P. (1999). Gender differences in choice reaction time: evidence for differential strategies. Ergonomics, 42, 327.
- Ando, S., Kida, N., & Oda, S. (2002). Practice effects on reaction time for peripheral and central visual fields. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95(3), 747-752.
- Bellini-Leite, S. C. (2022). Dual process theory: Embodied and predictive; symbolic and classical. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
- Boesveldt, S., Frasnelli, J., Gordon, A. R., & Lundström, J. N. (2010). The fish is bad: Negative food odors elicit faster and more accurate reactions than other odors. Biological Psychology, 84(2), 313-317.
- Boulinquez, P., & Barthélemy, S. (2000). Influence of the movement parameter to be controlled on manual RT asymmetries in right-handers. Brain and Cognition, 44(3), 653-661.
- Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2015). Five strategies for questioning with intention. Educational Leadership, 73(1), 66-69.
- Eurostat. (2024). Turnover and Volume of Sales in Wholesale and Retail Trade.
- Evans, J. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
- Gibson, B. (2008). Can evaluative conditioning change attitudes toward mature brands? New evidence from the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 178-188.
- Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a ‘memory drum’ theory of neuromotor reaction. The Research Quarterly, 31, 448-458.
- Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
- IBM Institute for Business Value & National Retail Federation. (2022). Consumers want it all. Hybrid Shopping, Sustainability and Purpose-Driven Brands.
- Jain, A., Bansal, R., Kumar, A., & Singh, K. D. (2015). A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times on the basis of gender and physical activity levels of medical first year students. International Journal of Applied & Basic Medical Research, 5(2), 124-127.
- Jevas, S., & Yan, J. H. (2001). The effect of aging on cognitive function: a preliminary quantitative review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 49.
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.
- Klapp, S. T. (2010). Comments on the classic Henry and Rogers (1960) paper on its 50th anniversary: resolving the issue of simple versus choice reaction time. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81(1), 108-113.
- Laming, D. R. J. (1968). Information Theory of Choice-Reaction Times. London: Academic Press.
- Luce, R. D. (1986). Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Milosavljevic, M., Koch, C., & Rangel, A. (2011). Consumers can make decisions in as little as a third of a second. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(6), 520-530.
- Nevid, J. S. (2010). Introduction to the special issue: Implicit measures of consumer response—the search for the Holy Grail of marketing research. Psychology & Marketing, 27, 913-920.
- O’Shea, G., & Bashore, T. R., Jr. (2012). The vital role of The American Journal of Psychology in the early and continuing history of mental chronometry. American Journal of Psychology, 125(4), 435-448.
- Pieters, R., & Warlop, L. (1999). Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(1), 1-16.
- Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421-457.
- Surwillo, W. W. (1973). Choice reaction time and speed of information processing in old age. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 321-322.
- Šostar, M., & Ristanović, V. (2023). Assessment of influencing factors on consumer behavior using the AHP model. Sustainability, 15(13).
- Teichner, W. H., & Krebs, M. J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 81, 75-98.
- Trimmel, M., & Poelzl, G. (2006). Impact of background noise on reaction time and brain DC potential changes of VDT-based spatial attention. Ergonomics, 49(2), 202-209.
- Van den Berg, J., & Neely, G. (2006). Performance on a simple reaction time task while sleep-deprived. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 102(2), 589-599.
- Van Rullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(4), 454-461.
- Welford, A. T. (1980). Choice reaction time: Basic concepts. In Reaction Times (pp. 73-128). New York: Academic Press.
- Zurawicki, L. (2010). Neuromarketing: Exploring the Brain of the Consumer. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
-
The processing of advertising: does a consumer’s level of materialism make a difference?
Materialism has been given great attention in the consumer behavior literature. How materialistic tendencies are shaped by advertising has also been documented. Yet, the impact of consumers’ materialism on their perceptions of ads is not clearly understood. The goal of this research is to examine the relationship between an individual’s materialism and his/her perceptions of various kinds of advertising. Using four specific advertising appeals (i.e., interpersonal, prestige/status, achievement, and appearance-related), attitudes toward the ad, and thoughts elicited by the advertisement were measured and compared across high and low materialism groups. Significant differences were found between respondents from the two groups with respect to the evaluation of each type of appeal. When prestige/status, achievement, and appearance-related appeals were used in advertising, they were evaluated more favorably by consumers with high levels of materialism than by consumers with low levels of materialism. In contrast, advertising that used an interpersonal appeal was viewed more favorably by consumers with low levels of materialism. The results of this research provide implications for marketers on three perspectives: the furthering of our conceptualization of the materialism construct, the design of promotional communication for specific target markets, and the public policy dimension of targeting consumers more vulnerable to certain appeals.
-
A review on household energy consumption behavior: how about migrated consumers?
Ebru Acuner ,
M. Özgür Kayalica 
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.09(4).2018.02
Environmental Economics Volume 9, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 8-21 Views: 2450 Downloads: 827 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper reviews the literature on energy consumption behavior for both domestic and migrated/displaced population and aims to recommend crucial policy measures for creating awareness on the energy efficiency. Consumers’ adoption to the efficient usage of energy varies depending on demographic, behavioral and situational dynamics in their households and societies. The regional or national strategies to implement efficient technologies for the consumer engagement are crucial to change their behaviors. Migrants affect the energy usage patterns in the host country due to their different usage behaviors. Any type of measures for migrated population should include available, acceptable, accessible and affordable energy efficiency applications to engage them with the domestic population.
-
Discovering the values of generation X and millennial consumers in Indonesia
Arief Helmi ,
Vita Sarasi ,
Umi Kaltum ,
Yogi Suherman
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(2).2021.01
Millennials and Generation X (Gen-X) are the fastest-growing market segment in Indonesia. The study aims to discover the salient values of those generations and to investigate their value differences. Data were obtained via questionnaires from 200 respondents of each generation. The questionnaires measure the importance of the values of each generation, consisting of nine values from the List of Values established by Kahle (1986), namely Sense of belonging, Excitement, Being well respected, Fun and enjoyment, Security, Self-fulfillment, Self-respect, Warm relationships with others, and Sense of accomplishment. This study employed factor analysis to identify sets of values representing their underlying values. This method resulted in three inherent values of Gen X and two of Millenials. Gen X shows the importance of Achievement, Family enjoyment, and Social relationship. Meanwhile, the Millennials are conspicuous by the values of Social recognition and Self-pleasing. Companies that choose Gen X as their target market can use their above-mentioned values to be expressed in their marketing strategies. Meanwhile, those who choose Millennials may use the two inherent values of this generation. This study fills a research gap on the characters of the emerging young generation segments in the country that can be adopted to generate market segment characters in the country.
Acknowledgment
This work was funded by a research grant from the Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.
