Paiboon Sareewiwatthana
-
1 publications
-
189 downloads
-
284 views
- 679 Views
-
0 books
-
Tests of quantitative investing strategies of famous investors: case of Thailand
Paiboon Sareewiwatthana , Patarapon Janin doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(3-1).2017.06Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 14, 2017 Issue #3 pp. 218-226
Views: 1353 Downloads: 651 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis research studied quantitative investing strategies of famous investors in the Stock Exchange of Thailand from 2002 to 2016. This study found that the Graham’s net nets, Dreman’s contrarian, Fisher’s super stock, O’Neil’s CANSLIM, Slater’s zulu principle, Neff’s Cheapo, O’Shaughnessy’s tiny titans, Greenblatt’s magic formula, Carlisle’s acquirer’s multiple and Piotroski’s F-score strategies beat the market (SET TRI). It also found that the Benjamin Graham’s net nets strategy which used the market capitalization of less than two thirds of net current assets value (NCAV) criterion produced the highest return among the strategies used. However, the Tobias Carlisle’s Acquirer’s multiple strategy which used EBIT to enterprise value (EBIT/EV) to sort stocks for 30 stocks yielded the highest risk-adjusted return.
-
Alternative analyses of market value added: a case study of Thailand
Paiboon Sareewiwatthana , Phasin Wanidwaranan doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(1).2019.05Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 16, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 65-78
Views: 2009 Downloads: 192 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper examines the market value added (MVA) of listed companies in Thailand. It is known that the major drawbacks of MVA are size and market return effects. Using the two additional approaches to improve MVA study – MVA change, and the market return adjusted of three-year growth rate of MVA – the better interpretations of MVA in the Thai market during 1999–2018 are obtained. The first approach reduces the market capitalization bias, while the second diminishes the effect of the overall market trend and the stability of firm’s current performance. This study finds that when the two alternative techniques are applied, the annual results of the MVA rankings are not consistent with those of the traditional MVA and thus lead to a new insight into such indicator. Therefore, this study advances the understanding of the market value added and value creation indicators.