Alternative analyses of market value added: a case study of Thailand
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(1).2019.05
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2019, Issue #1, pp. 65-78
- 2006 Views
-
189 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper examines the market value added (MVA) of listed companies in Thailand. It is known that the major drawbacks of MVA are size and market return effects. Using the two additional approaches to improve MVA study – MVA change, and the market return adjusted of three-year growth rate of MVA – the better interpretations of MVA in the Thai market during 1999–2018 are obtained. The first approach reduces the market capitalization bias, while the second diminishes the effect of the overall market trend and the stability of firm’s current performance. This study finds that when the two alternative techniques are applied, the annual results of the MVA rankings are not consistent with those of the traditional MVA and thus lead to a new insight into such indicator. Therefore, this study advances the understanding of the market value added and value creation indicators.
-
Keywordsmarket capitalization effect, market condition effect, Market for Alternative Investment (MAI), market return adjusted of three-year growth rate of MVA, market value added (MVA), MVA change, MVA’s drawbacks and improvements, performance measurement, shareholder wealth maximization, Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), Thai’s listed companies, value-based analysis
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F21, G15, G32, L21
-
References24
-
Tables10
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. The scatter plot of 2018 MVA and market value (million Baht)
- Figure 2. The scatter plot of 2018 MVA’s change and market value
- Figure 3. The scatter plot of 2018 three-year growth rate of market adjusted change of MVA and market value
-
- Table 1. Average MVA of MVA ranking portfolios (million Baht)
- Table 2. Industrial sectors of the top 50 MVA stocks during 1999–2018
- Table 3. The cross-sectional regression of 2018 MVA and market value
- Table 4. The average MVA of the MVA’s change portfolios (million Baht)
- Table 5. The industrial sector of top 50 MVA’s change stocks during 1999–2018
- Table 6. The cross-sectional regression of 2018 MVA’s change and market value
- Table 7. The correlation between average MVA’s change and market return
- Table 8. The average market return adjusted three-year growth rate of MVA
- Table 9. The industrial sector of top 50 three-year growth rate of market adjusted change of MVA stocks
- Table 10. The association between three-year growth rate of market adjusted change of MVA with average market value and three-year growth rate of market return
-
- Alipour, M., & Pejman, M. E. (2015). The impact of perfor¬mance measures, leverage and efficiency on market value added: Evidence from Iran. Global Economics and Management Review, 20(1), 6-14.
- Altaf, N. (2016). Economic value added or earnings: What explains market value in Indian firms? Future Business Journal, 2(2), 152-166.
- Anthony, J. H., & Ramesh, K. (1996). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2-3), 203-227.
- Banerjee, A. (1999). Economic value added and shareholder wealth – An empirical study of relationship. Paradigm, 3(1), 99-133.
- Banerjee, A. (2000). Linkage between economic value added and market value: An analysis. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 25(3), 23-36.
- Baum, C. L., Sarver, L., & Strickland, T. (2004). EVA, MVA and CEO compensation: further evidence. American Business Review, 22(2), 82-87.
- Biondi, Y. (2011). The pure logic of accounting: A critique of the fair value revolution. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 1(1), 2152-2820.
- Biondi, Y., & Righi, S. (2016). What does the financial market pricing do? A simulation analysis with a view to systemic volatility, exuberance and vagary. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 11(2), 175-203.
- Chen, S., & Dodd, J.L. (1997). Economic value added (EVA™): An empirical examination of a new corporate performance measure. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 318-333.
- Hartman, J. C. (2000). On the equivalence of net present value and market value added as measures of a project’s economic worth. The Engineering Economist, 45(2), 158-165.
- Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: Whatʼs the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
- Kim, J. J., Ahn, J., & Yun, J. K. (2004). Economic value added (EVA) as a proxy for market value added (MVA) and accounting earnings: Empirical evidence from the business cycle. Journal of Accounting & Finance Research, 12(1), 40-48.
- Kim, W. G. (2006). EVA and traditional accounting measures: Which metric is a better predictor of market value of hospitality companies? Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 30(1), 34-49.
- Kramer, J. K., & Peters, J. R. (2001). An interindustry analysis of economic value added as a proxy for market value added. Journal of Applied Finance, 11(1), 41-49.
- Lehn, K., & Makhija, A. K. (1996). EVA & MVA as performance measures and signals for strategic change. Strategy & Leadership, 24(3), 34-38.
- O’Byrne, S. F. (1997). EVA and shareholder return. Financial Practice and Education, 7, 50-54.
- Peterson, P. P., & Peterson, D. R. (1996). Company performance and measures of value added. Research Foundation of the Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts, 2, 1-60.
- Schwab, K. (2018). Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. World Economic Forum.
- Sheikholeslami, M. (2001). EVA, MVA, and CEO compensation. American Business Review, 19(1), 13-17.
- Stark, A. W., & Thomas, H. M. (1998). On the empirical relationship between market Value and residual income in the U.K. Management Accounting Research, 9(4), 445-460.
- Stewart, B. (1991). The Quest for Value. New York: Harper Business.
- Yook, K. C., & McCabe, G. M. (2001). MVA and the cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 27(3), 75-87.
- Young, D. (1997). Economic value added: A primer for European managers. European Management Journal, 15(4), 335-343.
- Zaima, J. K., Turetsky, H. F., & Cochran, B. (2005). The MVA‐EVA relationship: Separation of market driven versus firm driven effects. Review of Accounting and Finance, 4(1), 32-49.