Nijumon K. John

The announcement of a buyback informs the market about the company’s decision to repurchase its own shares. This announcement highlights the company’s price valuation and the inefficiencies that exist in the market. This study examines the share buyback announcement effect during the COVID-19 period. The study considered the stocks listed in the National Stock Exchange (NSE) that offered share buyback under tender offer mode during the pre-pandemic period between April 2016 and February 2020 and the post-pandemic period between March 2020 and March 2022. 75 firms in the pre-pandemic period and 43 in the post-pandemic period that announced share buyback under the tender offer method were analyzed. The event study methodology using a market model was employed to determine the presence of abnormal returns during the event period, which consisted of –21 days and +21 days. The findings of the study revealed the existence of abnormal returns in and around the announcement date. Besides, statistically significant cumulative abnormal average returns (CAAR) were also found on the event day, i.e., on Day 0. The study found that the impact of buyback announcements on stock returns significantly differed before and after COVID-19 for 10 and 21-day periods, with no significant differences for shorter periods. These insights can help traders and fund managers make informed portfolio adjustments during turbulent market periods surrounding buyback announcements.

Acknowledgement
The authors express their sincere gratitude and special thanks to Dr. Krishna T.A., Assistant Professor, Department of Professional Studies, School of Commerce, Finance and Accountancy, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, India, for encouraging, motivating and providing all the required support throughout this empirical investigation and to accomplish this research task.

Capital inflow into local bond markets helps countries with infrastructure financing, funding fiscal deficit, enhancing bond market liquidity, and diversifying investment portfolios globally. This study aims to assess the impact of institutional quality and capital account openness on capital inflow into Asian local bond markets for the period 2002–2023. For reflecting Asian bond markets, seven countries, namely, China, Malaysia, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Thailand, have been considered. The rule of law, regulatory quality, control of corruption, voice & accountability, political stability, and government effectiveness indices are the various proxies considered in this study to measure the different aspects of institutional quality. Further, the Chinn-Ito index is employed to measure capital account openness. Fixed effect, random effect, and pooled data ordinary least squares are employed as different forms of panel data estimation methods in this study. Moreover, Breusch-Pagan LM and Hausman tests are performed to select the most efficient estimation method. This study reveals that the rule of law, regulatory quality, and control of corruption have a positive influence on capital inflow at a 5% significance level and political stability at a 1% significance level. In contrast, capital account openness has a negative impact at a 1% significance level. However, neither voice & accountability nor government effectiveness have a significant influence over capital inflow. These findings suggest improving the rule of law and regulatory quality, creating policies for political stability, stringent acts against corruption, and controlling capital account openness to encourage capital inflow into local bond markets.