Diana Alisheva
-
1 publications
-
0 downloads
-
1 views
- 316 Views
-
0 books
-
Development and implementation of the green lending ecosystem: Bank-level factors, volumes, stability channels and short-term forecasts (2015–2024)
Azhar Nurmagambetova
,
Abdurrahman Zeki Arifioglu
,
Aliya Nurgaliyeva
,
Altynay Assanova
,
Diana Alisheva
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(1).2026.12
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 21, 2026 Issue #1 pp. 153-172
Views: 563 Downloads: 183 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯType of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Green lending growth can support bank resilience and is therefore relevant to Kazakhstan’s pathway to carbon neutrality by 2060. The study created a panel of banking years (2015–2024) and assessed the relationships between banks’ regulatory compliance, digitalization, borrowers’ ESG performance, and green loan volumes using multivariate models. The research provides short-term forecasts using compressed ARIMAX and policy scenarios. Moreover, 20 purposively selected semi-structured interviews (commercial bank executives, SME owners, customers, and policy experts) and a national survey of 850 adult bank customers / SME owners led by the author were added. Across preferred specifications, regulatory eligibility and borrower ESG are consistently positive: policy support is associated with KZT 7-9 billion more green credit per bank year, and each one-point increase in borrower ESG is associated with KZT 0.34-0.38 billion higher volumes. Digitalization is positive but model-sensitive, strengthening within-bank variation; larger banks extend more green credit, consistent with capacity advantages. The results are interpreted through three stability channels: improved screening/asset quality, portfolio tilt toward taxonomy-aligned exposures, and funding access without making solvency claims. Scenario paths suggest aggregate green lending could reach KZT 80-96 billion by 2027 under aligned policy-ESG-digital conditions; under weak support, it may stagnate near KZT 49-55 billion. Findings motivate the development of a binding taxonomy with standardized disclosures, a national ESG scorecard registry, and inclusive digital rails to enhance SME and rural uptake. -
Internal audit under Kazakhstan’s 2019 risk-management and internal control requirements: A continuous-treatment difference-in-differences analysis of commercial banks’ financial stability
Ulpan A. Shonayeva
,
Aliya Nurgaliyeva
,
Diana Alisheva
,
Gaukhar Uvakbayeva
,
Kalilla Abdullayev
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(3).2026.05
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Weak risk governance and legacy non-performing loans have repeatedly destabilized banks in emerging markets, making the payoff from regulatory strengthening of internal control and internal audit a first-order policy question. This study aims to determine whether Kazakhstan’s 2019 risk-management and internal control requirements (National Bank Resolution No. 188), whose core assurance mechanism is a strengthened internal audit function, improved the financial stability of the country’s commercial (second-tier) banks, and to identify the channel of this effect. The analysis applies a continuous-treatment difference-in-differences design to an annual panel of 37 banks over 2015–2025 (287 bank-years), interacting each bank’s pre-intervention (2016–2019) weakness with the post-intervention period and measuring stability by the log Z-score. The results show that the stabilizing effect is concentrated in the asset-quality channel: banks that entered the post-2020 period with a one-standard-deviation greater non-performing-loan weakness recorded a 0.38-0.41 log-point (roughly 40-50%) larger post-intervention increase in the Z-score (p < 0.01), whereas composite pre-intervention weakness yields no robust effect under any weighting scheme. The effect emerges with a multi-year lag, becoming statistically detectable only toward the end of the sample period, and operates through capital rebuilding. Because pre-intervention weakness strongly predicts market exit (Cox hazard ratio ≈ 3.95), the estimates are a lower bound on the intervention’s full association with sector stability. The findings imply that supervisors should target credit-risk governance, loan classification, timely recognition of problem loans, and provisioning, where strengthened internal control and audit yield the largest stability gains.
-
1 Articles
-
1 Articles
-
1 Articles
-
1 Articles
-
1 Articles
-
1 Articles
-
1 Articles
