Assessing the association between electronic invoicing and regional tax revenues in Kazakhstan
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.15(4).2026.04
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2026, Issue #4, pp. 47–60
- 12 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Electronic invoicing is an important component of digital tax administration that improves tax transparency and strengthens revenue administration. This study examines the association between electronic invoicing and regional tax revenues across Kazakhstan’s regions. The analysis uses regional panel data for 16 regions covering 2010–2024 and employs fixed-effects panel regression models together with k-means cluster analysis. The empirical dataset was obtained from the reports of the State Revenue Committee of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The results show that electronic invoicing is not significantly associated with regional tax revenues in either the baseline model (β = 0.039; p = 0.538) or the specification with a time trend (β = –0.024; p = 0.690). However, the specification using the shifted e-Inv indicator yields a positive and statistically significant association (β = 0.302; p = 0.047). Because e-Inv is a nationwide step dummy, this result reflects temporal robustness rather than evidence of a delayed fiscal effect. Across all model specifications, GRP per capita remains the strongest determinant of regional tax revenues (β ≈ 0.825-1.102), highlighting the central role of regional economic capacity. The cluster analysis identifies three distinct groups of regions with different fiscal and digital characteristics, illustrating substantial regional heterogeneity in Kazakhstan. The findings suggest that the association between electronic invoicing and regional tax revenues depends on model specification and broader economic conditions. In contrast, regional economic capacity remains the most robust determinant of tax revenues.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H26, H71, O33
-
References49
-
Tables7
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Dynamics of regional tax revenues in Kazakhstan, 2010–2024
-
- Table 1. Main variables
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Diagnostic test
- Table 4. Panel regression results
- Table 5. K-means cluster analysis results
- Table 6. Subgroup analysis: High-income vs. Other regions
- Table 7. Robustness and sensitivity analyses
-
- Adilet. (2021). On the approval of the national project “Technological breakthrough through digitalization, science and innovation” (Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 727). (In Russian).
- Adilet. (2025). Budget Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
- Agbeyegbe, T. D., Stotsky, J. G., & WoldeMariam, A. (2006). Trade liberalization, exchange rate changes, and tax revenue in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Asian Economics, 17(2), 261-284.
- Akitoby, B., Baum, A., Hackney, C., Harrison, O., Primus, K., & Salins, V. (2020). Tax revenue mobilization episodes in developing countries. Policy Design and Practice, 3(1), 1-29.
- Al-Khalaileh, G. A. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in tax administration and corporate tax compliance: Evidence from Jordan. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(S4), 3382-3405.
- Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton University Press.
- Arellano, M. (1987). Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49(4), 431-434.
- Asmara, E., Ngatno, Ratmono, D., & Herawati, A. R. (2025). Determinants of restaurant tax compliance: The moderating role of technology-based monitoring. Public and Municipal Finance, 14(2), 85-96.
- Ayoola, T. J., Olaniyi, O. O., Kolawole, P. E., Aregbesola, O. D., & Wright, O. (2023). Tax administration, trust in tax authorities, and personal income tax compliance: Evidence from Nigeria. Public and Municipal Finance, 12(1), 12-21.
- Belahouaoui, R., & Alm, J. (2025). Tax fraud detection using artificial intelligence-based technologies: Trends and implications. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(9), Article 502.
- Bellon, M., Dabla-Norris, E., Khalid, S., & Lima, F. (2022). Digitalization to improve tax compliance: Evidence from VAT e-invoicing in Peru. Journal of Public Economics, 210, Article 104661.
- Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2005). Redistribution via taxation: The limited role of the personal income tax in developing countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 16(6), 928-946.
- Bulut, A. (2023). Informal economy and financial development: The role of institutions. Sosyoekonomi, 31(55), 195-209.
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNS). (2024a). Information and communication technologies and communications [Data set].
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNS). (2024b). Statistics of national accounts [Data set].
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNS). (2024c). Statistics of prices [Data set].
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNS). (2024d). On the use of information and communication technologies at enterprises of the Republic of Kazakhstan [Data set].
- Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317-372.
- Dabla-Norris, E., Gradstein, M., & Inchauste, G. (2008). What causes firms to hide output? The determinants of informality. Journal of Development Economics, 85(1-2), 1-27.
- Dabla-Norris, E., Misch, F., Cleary, D., & Khwaja, M. S. (2020). The quality of tax administration and firm performance: Evidence from developing countries. International Tax and Public Finance, 27(3), 514-551.
- Davoodi, H. R., & Grigorian, D. A. (2007). Tax potential vs. tax effort: A cross-country analysis of Armenia’s stubbornly low tax collection (IMF Working Paper No. 07/106). International Monetary Fund.
- Department of State Revenue (DSR). (2014). Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated July 24, 2014 No. 818 “On approval of the Rules of document management of invoices issued in electronic form”. (In Russian).
- Efunboade, A. O. (2014). Impact of ICT on tax administration in Nigeria. Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems, 5, 26-29.
- Heinemann, M., & Stiller, W. (2025). Digitalization and cross-border tax fraud: Evidence from e-invoicing in Italy. International Tax and Public Finance, 32(1), 195-237.
- Hoy, C., McKenzie, L., & Sinning, M. (2024). Improving tax compliance without increasing revenue: Evidence from population-wide randomized controlled trials in Papua New Guinea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 72(2), 691-723.
- Jalles, J. T. (2026). Reforming tax systems: The interplay of governance, informality, and institutional strength in developing countries. Review of Development Economics, 30(1), 211-225.
- Karagoz, K. (2013). Determinants of tax revenue: Does sectoral composition matter? Journal of Finance, Accounting and Management, 4(2), 50-63.
- Keller, M. (2022). Oil revenues vs domestic taxation: Deeper insights into the crowding-out effect. Resources Policy, 76, Article 102560.
- Khamithan, N., Bekbulatova, R., & Niyazbekova, S. (2025). Prospects for the development of digitalization in taxation. Economic Series of the Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov ENU, (3), 227-241.
- Kotsogiannis, C., Salvadori, L., Karangwa, J., & Murasi, I. (2025). E-invoicing, tax audits and VAT compliance. Journal of Development Economics, 172, Article 103403.
- Lengaram, E., Ntuli, M., & Mahonye, N. (2025). Tax effort and capacity in developing countries: Unravelling the impact of the informal economy. Development Southern Africa, 42(4-5), 580-604.
- Macrotrends. (2024). Brent crude oil price history [Data set].
- Medina, L., & Schneider, F. (2019). Shedding light on the shadow economy: A global database and the interaction with the official one (CESifo Working Paper No. 7981). CESifo.
- Mogollón García, F. S., Rodríguez Chamorro, S. L., Núñez Puse, S. M., Quiroga Ríos, B. C., Garcés Aguilera, L. A., Arévalo Rodríguez, M. E., & Garcia Arismendiz, A. (2025). Electronic invoicing as a tax collection strategy in the context of Peruvian economic informality. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 15(3), 397-406.
- Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69-85.
- Nadirov, O., & Aliyev, K. (2015). Informality, tax evasion and the quality of business environment: Evidence from South Caucasian countries. European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 1(2), 114-127.
- Nose, M., & Mengistu, A. (2023). Exploring the adoption of selected digital technologies in tax administration: A cross-country perspective. IMF Notes, 2023(008).
- Nyamita, M. O., & Kaunda, D. I. (2023). The perception of the customs’ staff on administrative reforms and tax compliance in Kenya. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, 4(44).
- OECD. (2025). Tax administration digitalisation and digital transformation initiatives. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Olaleye, S. A., Sanusi, I. T., Dada, O. A., & Agbo, F. J. (2023). A bibliometric review of global visibility, impact and adoption of electronic invoicing: The past and the future. Heliyon, 9(3), Article e13726.
- Olatunji, O. C., & Ayodele, K. B. (2017). Impact of information technology on tax administration in Southwest, Nigeria. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: D Accounting and Auditing, 17(2), 25-33.
- Pessino, C., & Fenochietto, R. (2010). Determining countries’ tax effort. Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, 195(4), 65-87.
- Phinias, B. I., Ndolage, D. J., & Mwacha, M. (2024). The efficiency of virtual financial data management system in increasing tax collection: A cross-sectional study of traders in Tanzania. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(5), 1-8.
- Schneider, F. (2011). The shadow economy and shadow economy labor force: What do we (not) know? (IZA Discussion Paper No. 5769). Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Serrano Antón, F. (2021). Artificial intelligence and tax administration: Strategy, applications and implications, with special reference to the tax inspection procedure. World Tax Journal, 13(4).
- State Revenue Committee (SRC). (2023). Dynamics of tax revenues and payments to the state budget [Data set]. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (In Russian).
- Tao, R., & Li, J. (2026). Does electronic invoicing lead to stronger tax compliance? Evidence from China. PLOS ONE, 21(4), Article e0331880.
- Tiwari, A. K., Marak, Z. R., Paul, J., & Deshpande, A. P. (2023). Determinants of electronic invoicing technology adoption: Toward managing business information system transformation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(3), Article 100366.
- Wibawan, G. (2026). Digital accounting analysis in local tax administration: Evidence from regional own-source revenue of Karawang Regency 2021–2024. SSRN Electronic Journal.


