Governance quality and informal sector taxpayers’ compliance behavior in Osun state, Nigeria: A perspective from the theory of planned behavior

  • 10 Views
  • 0 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Mistrust in the social contract between governments and citizens in emerging markets remains a significant topic of scholarly research. Hence, the study examined the influence of governance quality on informal sector tax compliance behavior in Osun State, Nigeria. Primary data were obtained through a structured questionnaire spread among 256 respondents from a total population of 710 small and medium-scale enterprises (SMEs), comprising trading associations, petty traders, and market traders, in three major commercial cities from each of the three senatorial districts in the State: Osogbo, Ilesa, and Ede. The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). The results revealed that governance quality, measured by factors such as control of corruption (β = 0.36; p = 0.00), regulatory effectiveness (β = 0.663; p = 0.00), and voice and accountability (β = 0.078; p = 0.00), has a positive and significant influence on tax compliance among informal sector taxpayers in Osun State. The study concluded that the pathway from governance quality to informal sector tax compliance behavior in Osun State is the following: governance systems devoid of corruption, fairness of tax regulations, accountability of governance officials in the conduct of public businesses, and free and fair elections of democratically elected government representatives.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. SEM framework
    • Figure 2. PLS algorithm
    • Table 1. Population of the informal sector operators
    • Table 2. Measurement of the variables
    • Table 3. Demographics analysis
    • Table 4. Factor loadings, reliability, and construct validity
    • Table 5. Fornell-Larcker criterion
    • Table 6. Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) criterion
    • Table 7. Model fit of SEM one
    • Table 8. Path estimates
    • Table A1. Questionnaire
    • Formal Analysis
      Babatunde Moses Ololade, Adisa Akibu Salawu
    • Funding acquisition
      Babatunde Moses Ololade, Odunayo Olamide Olaniyi
    • Investigation
      Babatunde Moses Ololade, Adisa Akibu Salawu, Odunayo Olamide Olaniyi
    • Methodology
      Babatunde Moses Ololade, Adisa Akibu Salawu, Odunayo Olamide Olaniyi
    • Project administration
      Babatunde Moses Ololade
    • Supervision
      Babatunde Moses Ololade
    • Validation
      Babatunde Moses Ololade, Adisa Akibu Salawu, Odunayo Olamide Olaniyi
    • Writing – review & editing
      Babatunde Moses Ololade, Odunayo Olamide Olaniyi
    • Conceptualization
      Adisa Akibu Salawu
    • Resources
      Adisa Akibu Salawu
    • Data curation
      Odunayo Olamide Olaniyi
    • Software
      Odunayo Olamide Olaniyi